Fifth-Year Option Notes: Vikings, Titans, 49ers

While most NFL teams only have one fifth-year option decision to make in the next couple weeks, assuming they haven’t already made that decision, the Vikings will have calls to make on three separate players. Thanks to a pair of trades, the Vikes had a trio of first-round picks in the 2013 draft, meaning defensive tackle Sharrif Floyd, cornerback Xavier Rhodes, and wide receiver Cordarrelle Patterson are all eligible to have 2017 options exercised.

Let’s round up the latest updates on Minnesota’s option decisions, along with some other fifth-year option notes from around the NFL…

  • Patterson’s option for 2017 will be worth $7.915MM, making it more expensive than Floyd’s ($6.757MM) and nearly as pricey as Rhodes’ ($8.026MM). As such, given the wideout’s limited on-field impact, it would be a surprise if the Vikings pick it up, writes Chris Tomasson of the St. Paul Pioneer Press. However, Tomasson notes that Floyd’s and Rhodes’ options are near-locks to be exercised.
  • It doesn’t appear the Titans have made a final decision on the 2017 option for guard Chance Warmack, but Terry McCormick of suggests the team may be leaning toward turning it down, given the exorbitant price ($11.902MM). Tennessee has until May 3rd to make a decision.
  • 49ers general manager Trent Baalke said today that the team intends to retain safety Eric Reid beyond the coming season, either by picking up his fifth-year option or by working out a longer-term deal, tweets Cam Inman of the Bay Area News Group. Reid’s 2017 salary would be $5.676MM if the Niners exercise that option.
  • Check out PFR’s 2017 option tracker to keep tabs on all decisions that have been reported or announced so far.
View Comments (1)
newest oldest

One comment on “Fifth-Year Option Notes: Vikings, Titans, 49ers

  1. Dallas Robinson

    The option price on Warmack really shows the problem with listing all offensive linemen as one group. There’s no way you can pay him $11MM, but they shouldn’t even be faced with that decision. Defensive ends and tackles are split up, why not interior offensive linemen and tackles?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.