Known for letting cornerbacks serve as one-contract players in the Andy Reid era, the Chiefs will strongly consider making an exception. Trent McDuffie extension talks, which began last year, are set to resume.
The Chiefs and their top defensive back negotiated during the 2025 offseason but could not come to terms on an extension prior to Week 1. While Kansas City hammered out a deal with fellow 2022 first-round pick George Karlaftis, McDuffie is on a higher level at his respective position. The prospect of McDuffie pursuing a market-setting contract came up in November, and his camp will have another chance to present a sales pitch to the Chiefs.
[RELATED: Assessing Chiefs’ Offseason Blueprint]
“We had a lot of dialogue with Trent last spring, last summer. He’s first out of the gate,” Chiefs GM Brett Veach said, via Fox4’s Jared Bush. “Looking forward to get with him and obviously Trent’s a great player. We’d certainly love to have Trent back for the long term.”
Going back to Marcus Peters, the Chiefs have not shown interest in paying corners over the past decade. They traded Peters and L’Jarius Sneed and let Steven Nelson, Kendall Fuller and Charvarius Ward walk. Jaylen Watson is expected to join that one-contract group, being set for free agency next month. One season remains on McDuffie’s rookie deal, which the team extended through 2026 via the fifth-year option.
McDuffie, 25, has been the Chiefs’ top cornerback since arriving in the 2022 first round. Chosen with the first-round pick obtained from the Dolphins in the Tyreek Hill trade, McDuffie has played well outside and in the slot. He is a two-time All-Pro, but because no original-ballot Pro Bowl honors have come his way, the Chiefs landed a discount on his fifth-year option (which checks in at $13.63MM).
Even after the Chiefs completed their latest Patrick Mahomes restructure, they are still projected to be more than $3MM over the cap. It would behoove Kansas City to extend McDuffie and reduce his cap number. The Chiefs’ history at this position should keep a potential blockbuster trade on the radar, in the event McDuffie’s price point (as Hill’s did amid 2022 negotiations) exceeds the team’s comfort zone. Though, the Chiefs could also string this process out — as they did with Orlando Brown Jr. in ’22 — via a franchise tag next year.
But the team, which re-signed its D-line and linebacker pillars (Chris Jones, Nick Bolton) over the past two offseasons, will explore what it will take to extend its secondary ace this week in Indianapolis.

“Chiefs say they’re taking different approach as Travis Kelce mulls return” — KansasCity.com/Kansas City Star
“Kansas City Chiefs ‘prepared’ for Kelce retirement” — BBC Sport
Which is the more plausible story?
Hopefully the latter