Robert Kraft, Tom Brady Issue Statements

9:15am: At a Wednesday morning press conference, Patriots owner Robert Kraft said that he was “wrong to put his faith in the league” (via Mike Reiss of on Twitter). Kraft explained that he was willing to “accept the harshest penalty in the history of the NFL for an alleged ball violation” because he believed that it would exonerate Brady, Jeff Howe of the Boston Herald tweets.

Kraft expressed regret for not taking legal action against the NFL and slammed Goodell. “There are those in the league office who are more determined to prove they were right rather than admit any culpability,” the Pats owner said, according to Mike Garafolo of FOX Sports (on Twitter).

Kraft’s full statement is below (transcript from Mike Florio of PFT):

I felt it was important to make a statement today, prior to the start of training camp. After this, I will not be talking about this matter until after the legal process plays itself out, and I would advise everyone in the organization to do the same and just concentrate on preparation for the 2015 season.

The decision handed down by the league yesterday is unfathomable to me. It is routine for discipline in the NFL to be reduced upon appeal. In the vast majority of these cases, there is tangible and hard evidence of the infraction for which the discipline is being imposed, and still the initial penalty gets reduced. Six months removed from the AFC championship game, the league still has no hard evidence of anybody doing anything to tamper with the PSI levels of footballs.

I continue to believe and unequivocally support Tom Brady. I first and foremost need to apologize to our fans, because I truly believe what I did in May, given the actual evidence of the situation and the league’s history on discipline matters, would make it much easier for the league to exonerate Tom Brady.

Unfortunately, I was wrong.

The league’s handling of this entire process has been extremely frustrating and disconcerting. I will never understand why an initial erroneous report regarding the PSI level of footballs was leaked by a source from the NFL a few days after the AFC championship game, [and] was never corrected by those who had the correct information. For four months, that report cast aspersions and shaped public opinion.

Yesterday’s decision by Commissioner was released in a similar manner, under an erroneous headline that read, “Tom Brady destroyed his cellphone.” This headline was designed to capture headlines across the country and obscure evidence regarding the tampering of air pressure in footballs. It intentionally implied nefarious behavior and minimized the acknowledgement that Tom provided the history of every number he texted during that relevant time frame. And we had already provided the league with every cellphone of every non-NFLPA that they requested, including head coach Bill Belichick.

Tom Brady is a person of great integrity, and is a great ambassador of the game, both on and off the field. Yet for reasons that I cannot comprehend, there are those in the league office who are more determined to prove that they were right rather than admit any culpability of their own or take any responsibility for the initiation of a process and ensuing investigation that was flawed.

I have come to the conclusion that this was never about doing what was fair and just. Back in May, I had to make a difficult decision that I now regret. I tried to do what I thought was right. I chose not to take legal action. I wanted to return the focus to football.

I have been negotiating agreements on a global basis my entire life. I know there are times when you have to give up important points of principle to achieve a greater good. I acted in good faith and was optimistic that by taking the actions I took the league would have what they wanted. I was willing to accept the harshest penalty in the history of the NFL for an alleged ball violation because I believed it would help exonerate Tom.

I have often said, ‘If you want to get a deal done, sometimes you have to get the lawyers out of the room.’ I had hoped that Tom Brady’s appeal to the league would provide Roger Goodell the necessary explanation to overturn his suspension. Now, the league has taken the matter to court, which is a tactic that only a lawyer would recommend.

Once again, I want to apologize to the fans of the New England Patriots and Tom Brady. I was wrong to put my faith in the league. Given the facts, evidence, and laws of science that underscore this entire situation, it is completely incomprehensible to me that the league continues to take steps to disparage one of its all-time great players, and a man for whom I have the utmost respect.

Personally, this is very sad and disappointing to me.

9:09am: On Tuesday, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell decided to uphold Tom Brady‘s four-game suspension and in the process, he asserted that the Patriots quarterback destroyed his phone in an attempt to hide critical evidence from league investigators. We then heard statements from virtually every party involved, with the exception of the accused. That changed this morning when Brady took to Facebook to give his version of events. In a lengthy statement, Brady refuted the notion that he broke his phone in order to conceal evidence:

“I also disagree with yesterdays narrative surrounding my cellphone. I replaced my broken Samsung phone with a new iPhone 6 AFTER my attorneys made it clear to the NFL that my actual phone device would not be subjected to investigation under ANY circumstances. As a member of a union, I was under no obligation to set a new precedent going forward, nor was I made aware at any time during Mr. Wells investigation, that failing to subject my cell phone to investigation would result in ANY discipline.

Most importantly, I have never written, texted, emailed to anybody at anytime, anything related to football air pressure before this issue was raised at the AFC Championship game in January. To suggest that I destroyed a phone to avoid giving the NFL information it requested is completely wrong.”

Brady also claimed that “the discipline was upheld without any counter offereven though multiple reports indicated that there were settlement talks between the two sides before Goodell’s decision was handed down. Either way, Brady is set to serve a four-game suspension, unless a federal court intercedes in the ruling.

View Comments (3)
newest oldest

3 comments on “Robert Kraft, Tom Brady Issue Statements

  1. Does anybody know if Kraft can now change his mind and fight the fine and loss of draft picks, or is it too late?

  2. Frank

    Nobody did anything wrong, nothing happened. So why did a couple of stadium employees lose their jobs? Hope Brady is sending their families a check.


Leave a Reply