The future of Myles Garrett remains uncertain at this point, with his public trade request still standing. It would come as no surprise around the league if a deal sending him away from the Browns were to take place, but Cleveland’s intention remains keeping him in the fold.
Two years remain on Garrett’s pact, and he is owed roughly $45MM across that span. Without any outstanding guaranteed salary on the deal, any acquiring team would need to work out an extension moving him near (or to) the top of the edge rush financial pecking order while providing new locked in money. The 2023 Defensive Player of the Year is not using his trade request as a means of securing a new contract, however.
In spite of that, the Browns’ willingness to work out a raise with Garrett appears to be undeterred. As The Athletic’s Zac Jackson notes, the team looks to be prepared to make a “monstrous” extension offer which would keep the 29-year-old in Cleveland. (subscription required). Any new commitment on Garrett’s part would of course put to rest the chances of a trade for at least the near future and make it likely he would finish his decorated career with the Browns.
Team and player are not in alignment with respect to contending in the immediate future, and uncertainty at the quarterback spot represents a suitable reason on Garrett’s part to prefer a change of scenery. With that said, Cleveland will be able to afford an inexpensive bridge starter in free agency once the latest Deshaun Watson restructure takes place, and the No. 2 selection in April’s draft could give the team the opportunity to add a rookie to the mix. Especially if the Browns make a notable addition under center, they could attempt to rebuke trade offers and retain Garrett for 2025 and beyond.
On that point, Mary Kay Cabot of cleveland.com writes the team could very well be prepared to wait this situation out through the start of next season (subscription required). She adds that could even be the case if Garrett were to sit out games in 2025, something which would be aimed at accelerating the trade process. Offers including at least one first-round pick and more can be expected this offseason from interested suitors, although general manager Andrew Berry has previously stated a pair of Day 1 selections would not be sufficient to make a trade something he would be prepared to entrain.
That sentiment would no doubt especially hold true after the draft, so late April represents an unofficial deadline for any movement on the Garrett front. If a renewed effort were to be made by the Browns to work out an extension, a new wrinkle to this situation would come into play.
Do the Browns know what they are doing?
No!
How is that a question? Have you met the Browns?
The Factory of Sadness says it all!
Not since Haslam bought the team.
I’m 51. When were they good during my lifetime?
Good? Or consistently good? They had the 2nd best record in the AFC in 2023-24 and won 11 games and a playoff game in 2020. There’s a lot of teams that can’t make that claim. Now, since they’ve been back, they have been bad but to answer your question, 2020 and 2023 they were a combined 22-11 with 3 playoff games. Some would call that good
arty, do you remember the 1980s?
I do. Elway defeated them twice to go onto the SB.
I just love your positive attitude.
Even more insulting to the Browns; they moved to Baltimore and promptly won the SB. Talk about owning ‘The Factory of Sadness’ mantra.
But, at least they didn’t bolt in the middle of the night like the Colts did.
3 times. 86,87, and 89
How many SB’s for the Browns in the 80’s? 0 at my last count.
Lots of teams haven’t even gotten that far. Not making a Super Bowl doesn’t mean that you weren’t a good team during that time. I think most people would say that Buffalo and Baltimore have been good teams for the last 5-7 years
Ask the players that question.
So you don’t think that Baltimore, KC and Buffalo think that they are good even though they didn’t win a Super Bowl?
They were playoff teams. The Bengals weren’t. I think Joe B is one heck of a QB. But him getting crushed every season is ridiculous. PROTECT YOUR FRANCHISE QB! Is it that hard to understand?
I remember when Manning was in Indy. The only 1st round pick I believe they made on the D side was D Freeney. I may be wrong, but they drafted O lineman, WR’s, TE’s, RB’s ect. They were perfectly comfortable to win shootouts.
And Philadelphia had the best defense and rushing attack and won a Super Bowl. Look at how many defensive players they drafted. You mentioned Indy of 2007. There’s no one way to win a Super Bowl but I don’t know many that have with the 28th and 31st ranked defensive units.
I agree. But my original post still stands. Line plays win in football. On both sides. Philly didn’t blitz once in the SB. That’s dominant. On their other side, Barkley went for 2,000 on the ground.
And Burrow was sacked 48 times and dropped back to pass 200 more times than the Eagles quarterbacks who were sacked 45 times. Sounds pretty even to me. Chase Brown didn’t rush for 2000 yards but he was a few away from 1000 and averaged over 5 ypc. Biggest difference……Eagles defense was rated #1. Bengals defense was rated #28
Thank you for proving my point. ” And Burrow was sacked 48 times and dropped back 200 more passes than the Eagles QB’s who were sacked 45 times.’
Cincy needs an OL. Still that hard to understand? Guess so.
Math isn’t your strength. If Burrow dropped back 200 more times than Philadelphia quarterbacks but was only sacked 3 more times, it means that Philadelphia quarterbacks were sacked at a higher rate. 48 sacks for 650 pass attempts is not that bad. The Bengals do need a RG but they gotta stop giving up 30 points a game first. I’ve already told you that Burrow was sacked more in his 2nd and 3rd years than he was in his 4th and 5th years. He made the playoffs in his 2nd and 3rd years and not in his 4th and 5th years. You want to know why? Better defense. You’re losing this argument. You gotta be the only guy who thinks the Bengals have a good defense
Myles: this team is directionless and I want to actually win something.
The Browns: How about staying here longer, will that make you happy?
Browns need to admit the Watson mistake & collect picks from Myles.
They’ve already admitted that
Admitting the mistake would be trading Garrett and trying to recoup some draft capital that they gave up for Watson. Trying to hold on to Garrett is clearly not admitting the mistake and thinking you can win with tweaks to a roster that has to be rebuilt.
I’m guessing the Browns are posturing to drive up the price for Garrett. We’ve entered into the lying season. I’m betting they trade him.
Lots of losing teams turn it around in 1 season getting a rookie quarterback. Denver, Houston and Washington all did it in the last 2 years. Browns are 1 year removed from the 2nd best record in the AFC.
It’s more likely they are picking in the top 5 of the draft in 2026 than making the playoffs in 2025.
Also, they had a point differential of +34 in 2023. Their expected W/L record was 9.4-7.6. They were no juggernaut. Just lucky.
All of those teams had high draft picks, and lots of them. Plus, they had/have cap space and didn’t have an incumbent sexual predator on the roster with a $73 million cap hit. Double down. We all hope the Browns are awful for the next twenty years after that Watson move.
The combine should provide a list of teams that can actually get him. The Browns can’t wait too far into FA.
Browns are that girl everyone warned you about but you swore it would be different with you.
Now look at you
The stereotypical guy or gal you need to avoid is both attractive and toxic. The Browns only exist to make Raider fans feel better about our level of ineptitude.
That was the 2019-2022 Baker Browns, attractive and toxic.
Is the Browns FO actually discussing whether or not Garrett is the missing piece?
I can’t wait to see what kind of a bonehead extension offer they make Garrett.
They are fast becoming the “Hold my Beer” to the perennial cap issues of the Saints.
We’ve been hearing this for years. Even with the terrible Watson contract, the Browns still aren’t in cap hell. Berry may not be great at drafting but they can manipulate the cap as well as anyone
$31M over right now that has to get fixed by start of league year. They have 9 players with a $10M+ cap charge for 2025 including $73M for Watson. Remember when Watson was suspended and everyone laughed that the Browns were so smart backloading his contract. Now is the back end.
For 2026, they have are under the cap by $1.1M but only have 31 players under contract.
They will end up spreading some of the 2025 over into 2026 to help out, particularly with new acquisitions that would be on the team beyond 2025.
They have work to do.
And they can add restructures and void years. The Browns won’t lose anyone they don’t want to lose. I can see them getting rid of guys that have not lived up to their contracts like Tomlinson, Conklin and Thornhill
I used to think my Lions were the kings of ineptitude. The Browns take this to a whole other level! From Deshaun Watson to this… If they had any class at all, they’d work out a trade for this pillar of the organization and let him atleast try and get a ring. He’s been a class act through and through and deserves much better than the kind of team that the CB’s are going to run out there for the next handful of years. What an absolute sh!t-show!
He’s an okay guy I guess, but class act? Not exactly.
Yours truly,
Steeler fan
Mr Mason Rudolph is on line #1 for you.
“The 2023 Defensive Player of the Year is not using his trade request as a means of securing a new contract, however”.
Yeah right! That would be such an original idea. Who knows…other players might get the same idea and catch owners by complete surprise.
I’ve been saying this for awhile. The Browns initially didn’t want to extend Myles this off-season so he demanded a trade knowing that an extension will quickly follow
Go Bills!!!
I was raised in a Cleveland home and my earliest memories are of Kosar and crew. Nothing good has ever happened here since the move, and as a result I moved my allegiance years ago (heritage is Norwegian so the Vikings seemed logical) unfortunately, I still want them to do well but I can not imagine going though this every year. Cleveland is just junk.
I know this is crazy and probably not possible but with the cap going up maybe they could package him and Watson and only take like a later pick back just to get off of Watson deal .
Granted I’m not sure what the dead money would be or if it is even beneficial .
To much dead money