The NFL Players Association’s appeal of its collusion grievance against the NFL was unsuccessful. The three-person appeal panel found that the league invited its clubs to come together and collectively oppose future fully-guaranteed contracts in the wake of the Browns’ decision to authorize such a deal for Deshaun Watson, but the panel also determined there was not enough evidence to show the teams accepted that invitation.
Aside from the ramifications the ruling has for the league, the union, and negotiations between the two, it also included other intriguing details. The grievance was originally filed in October 2022 on behalf of three players, including Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson, who was seeking an extension at the time and who was attempting to land a Watson-esque contract. As Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk relays, the appeal decision noted that Baltimore offered a three-year, fully-guaranteed contract to Jackson on two separate occasions. Jackson declined both proposals and, in April 2023, signed a five-year, $260MM pact that included $185MM in guarantees (the first two years and part of the third were guaranteed at signing, and the rest of the guarantees locked in on a rolling basis; the fifth year contains no guaranteed money).
Aside from the fully-guaranteed nature of the three-year proposals, the appeal decision does not include any other details, such as financial terms or whether either overture featured a no-tag clause. Therefore, it is impossible to truly analyze the merits of the offers and whether Jackson was wise to reject them, though it seems the Ravens were among the teams willing to resist the league’s efforts to remove fully-guaranteed deals from the playbook (at least for a player of Jackson’s caliber).
Jackson, 29, rewarded the Ravens in his first season after putting pen to paper on his five-year deal by submitting his second MVP campaign and leading the team to the AFC Championship Game. He followed that up with an even better performance in 2024, though he finished second in MVP voting that year.
The 2025 season was a frustrating one for Jackson and the Ravens alike, as the star signal-caller struggled with injuries and Baltimore failed to qualify for the postseason. While Jackson’s legacy will ultimately be determined by whether he can lead the Ravens to a Super Bowl title, Jackson clearly represents the franchise’s best hope for a third championship.
To that end, Baltimore still wants to extend Jackson, whose current deal runs through the 2027 season. In order to conduct regular business this offseason, the Ravens freed up nearly $40MM in cap space by restructuring the contract in March, but it appears as if negotiations between the team and the self-represented player will continue. Thanks to the decision in the collusion matter, we now have a little extra context when considering those negotiations.