PFR Originals: 11/15/15 – 11/22/15
The original content and analysis produced by the PFR staff during the past week:
- Luke Adams scrutinized the 2016 cap outlook for the Steelers, identifying Antonio Brown and David DeCastro as potential candidates for an extension, while noting that Cortez Allen, Jacoby Jones, and others could be in danger of being released.
- Luke also posted a complete list of traded NFL draft picks for 2016.
- Zach Links rounded up the best of the football blogs in the latest edition of Pigskin Links.
- In our Community Tailgate series, we post topics for discussion and encourage readers to share their thoughts in the comments section. The issues covered this week:
2016 Cap Outlook: Pittsburgh Steelers
Through the 2015 NFL season, Pro Football Rumors will be looking ahead to the 2016 offseason, gauging the salary cap situation for each of the league’s 32 teams. The cap for 2016 hasn’t been set yet, but we can still assess the salary commitments made by a club and determine whether or not that club will be in good financial shape going forward.
In addition to evaluating each team’s overall cap situation, we’ll focus in on a few key players who may be candidates to be extended, restructured, or released by their current teams. These lists aren’t comprehensive, and depending on a player’s 2015 performance and health, he could drop off one of these lists – or be added to one – as the season goes on. For now though, these are some players to watch.
Using data from Over The Cap, we’re making our way through NFL teams in order of total salary commitments for 2016. Today’s team is the Steelers, who currently have the fifth-highest total for their ’16 cap.
Let’s dive in….
Top 10 cap hits for 2016:
- Ben Roethlisberger, QB: $23,950,000
- Lawrence Timmons, LB: $15,131,250
- Antonio Brown, WR: $12,370,833
- Maurkice Pouncey, C: $10,551,000
- Cameron Heyward, DE: $10,400,000
- David DeCastro, G: $8,070,000
- Heath Miller, TE: $7,181,668
- Mike Mitchell, S: $6,763,750
- Marcus Gilbert, RT: $6,461,000
- Cortez Allen, CB: $5,750,000
Current 2016 cap number for top 51 players: $144,927,485
With a new contract extension in hand, Roethlisberger will continue to be the Steelers’ highest-paid player – with the club’s largest cap number – going forward. But he’s hardly the only veteran player who has a substantial cap hit in 2016. Timmons’ figure is perhaps the most interesting, since it’s extremely rare to see a cap charge get that high for any inside linebacker. He’s followed by three other players with eight-digit cap numbers, two of whom signed new contract extensions within the last year and a half.
Candidates for extension:
- Antonio Brown, WR
- David DeCastro, G
Brown had hoped to sign a new contract this past offseason, but ultimately settled for a reworking of his deal that saw some money moved from 2016 to 2015. It’s not a surprise that the Steelers were unwilling to do anything more drastic, since the pact runs through the 2017 season, and extending it so early would set an unwanted precedent. However, the two sides could revisit talks this coming offseason.
Brown’s current contract calls for him to make a combined $15MM in base salary in 2016 and 2017, which is far below the salaries that recently-signed wideouts like Dez Bryant, Demaryius Thomas, and T.Y. Hilton are getting. So Brown should be in line for a nice raise. Still, depending on how the Steelers structure an offer, an extension could significantly reduce Brown’s 2016 cap number from its current $12.37MM figure.
As for DeCastro, he has a fifth-year option keeping him under contract with Pittsburgh for the 2016 season. DeCastro is a steady, reliable presence in the middle of the Steelers’ offensive line, but the team will likely want to bring down his cap charge for next year a little, since it currently exceeds $8MM. If DeCastro were to sign a long-term extension, the annual average would likely be a little less than that, and the new deal could be backloaded, reducing his impact on the 2016 cap.
Candidates for restructure:
- Marcus Gilbert, RT
- Cameron Heyward, DE
- Mike Mitchell, S
- Maurkice Pouncey, C
- Ben Roethlisberger, QB
Most of the players listed here have contracts with similar structures — Gilbert, Heyward, Mitchell, and Pouncey will all see their cap hits increase significantly in 2016 and remain fairly high in future seasons, so if the Steelers choose to restructure any of those deals, they could be creating problems down the road. I wouldn’t expect the club to want – or need – to restructure all four players, but one or two of them could be addressed if cap room start getting tight.
Heyward and Pouncey could be the top candidates for restructures, for a couple of reasons. For one, their cap charges are a few million dollars larger than Gilbert’s or Mitchell’s, so restructuring those deals will make a bigger impact. Additionally, their contracts through 2019 or 2020, meaning a signing bonus can be spread across several seasons without affecting a single year too negatively.
Roethlisberger’s contract may be the most logical one for a restructure though — his $23.95MM cap hit for 2016 is higher than his cap numbers in 2017, 2018, or 2019, so moving some money to those later years isn’t quite so risky, and it could create massive flexibility in the short term, if necessary.
Candidates for pay cut or release:
- Cortez Allen, CB
- Jacoby Jones, WR
- Heath Miller, TE
- Arthur Moats, OLB
- Lawrence Timmons, LB
It’s hard to imagine the Steelers releasing either Miller or Timmons, who have been with the franchise since 2005 and 2007, respectively. Nonetheless, the team will have to take a hard look at both players’ contracts, which expire at the end of the 2016 season.
Miller hasn’t been quite as productive this year as he has been in some recent seasons, though his slightly reduced numbers could be a result of the quarterback carousel that began when Roethlisberger was injured. Timmons, meanwhile, battled a toe injury during the preseason, and hasn’t been as effective in the middle of the defense as he has been in years past. Pittsburgh could create $4MM in cap savings by cutting Miller, and nearly $9MM by cutting Timmons, though pay cuts or extensions are probably more likely.
Allen and Jones, on the other hand, look like obvious release candidates, though Jones’ deal is much easier to shed than Allen’s, which will still include $4MM+ in dead money in 2016. Given how little the Steelers have gotten out of the cornerback since he signed that extension with the club, it’s hard to see how they can keep him at a $4MM base salary though, so that deal will need to be addressed in some form. For his part, Jones would have to have a huge second half in 2015 to return on his current $3MM salary for 2016.
Moats’ case falls somewhere in the middle. His $2.5MM base salary for next season isn’t exorbitant, and he has a pair of sacks for the Steelers this year. But he’s not exactly irreplaceable, and if Pittsburgh plans to address the outside linebacker position in the draft, there will be players that could replicate Moats’ production at a lesser cost. I wouldn’t be shocked to see the veteran linebacker return on his current contract, but the Steelers should have to at least consider making a move.
Contract information from Over The Cap was used in the creation of this post.
Community Tailgate: AFC Playoff Picture
As the NFL regular season nears its home stretch, there are plenty of topics and storylines to discuss, and PFR’s Community Tailgate is designed to address those stories. What’s the Community Tailgate all about? Well, it’s pretty simple. We’ll highlight one of the top stories going on in the NFL. Then, in the comment section below, we want you to weigh in and let us know what you think.
Of course, while the debate may get spirited, we ask that it all stays respectful. If you need a reminder of our rules, please check out our commenting policy. Basically, we ask that you refrain from inappropriate language, personal insults, and attacks. Speaking of commenting: we’ve made it much easier to leave a comment here at Pro Football Rumors. You are no longer required to be a registered user – simply put in your name, email address, and comment and submit.
With seven weeks remaining in the NFL season, a few division races around the league are closer than others. Bills head coach Rex Ryan admitted this week that the 9-0 Patriots will almost certainly win the AFC East, considering New England holds a four-game lead over both the Jets and Ryan’s Bills. Elsewhere though, there’s a little more drama, if you can call the AFC South race “dramatic” — two teams with sub-.500 records – the 4-5 Colts and Texans – are currently tied for first place in the South.
We’ll get to the NFC next week, but today, we want to take a look at the AFC playoff picture. The Pats are locks to reach the postseason, and the 8-1 Bengals look like a pretty safe bet as well, but are there any other sure things?
The 7-2 Broncos hold a three-game division lead, and should have no problem winning the West, but they’ll be relying on Brock Osweiler at quarterback for at least the short-term future, so there are no guarantees. The 6-4 Steelers have looked solid, but they’ve also been hit hard by injuries, and they don’t have much room for error, with eight AFC teams sitting on either four or five wins. The Bills and Jets are the only five-win teams, but the four-win Dolphins, Raiders, Chiefs, Colts, Texans, and Jaguars are all lurking.
What do you think? Will the three AFC teams with big division leads hang on? Which club will win the AFC South, and which teams will snag Wild Card spots? Are you predicting a second-half surge or collapse from any postseason contenders?
Weigh in below in the comments section with your thoughts and predictions!
Community Tailgate: Undefeated NFL Teams
As the NFL regular season nears its home stretch, there are plenty of topics and storylines to discuss, and PFR’s Community Tailgate is designed to address those stories. What’s the Community Tailgate all about? Well, it’s pretty simple. We’ll highlight one of the top stories going on in the NFL. Then, in the comment section below, we want you to weigh in and let us know what you think.
Of course, while the debate may get spirited, we ask that it all stays respectful. If you need a reminder of our rules, please check out our commenting policy. Basically, we ask that you refrain from inappropriate language, personal insults, and attacks. Speaking of commenting: we’ve made it much easier to leave a comment here at Pro Football Rumors. You are no longer required to be a registered user – simply put in your name, email address, and comment and submit.
One of the NFL’s three remaining undefeated teams was unable to make it through Week 10 unscathed, as the Bengals dropped a shocker in Cincinnati to the Texans on Monday night to fall to 8-1. The Bengals’ loss leaves the 9-0 Patriots and Panthers as the league’s only teams without a loss, with just seven weeks remaining in the regular season.
Despite being hit hard by injuries, the Patriots have looked like the NFL’s best team for most of the season, and will host the Bills this Monday night as they look to push their record to 10-0. The team’s schedule the rest of the way looks like this:
- vs. Bills
- at Broncos
- vs. Eagles
- at Texans
- vs. Titans
- at Jets
- at Dolphins
As for the Panthers, impressive wins against the Seahawks, Eagles, Packers, and Colts in recent weeks have gone a long way to proving they’re no fluke. Carolina’s schedule the rest of the way is as follows:
- vs. Washington
- at Cowboys
- at Saints
- vs. Falcons
- at Giants
- at Falcons
- vs. Buccaneers
Neither team’s schedule features a real murderer’s row of opponents, but there are potential pitfalls for both clubs. Even without Peyton Manning, the Broncos have a strong enough team to give the Pats some trouble, and those divisional games, particularly on the road, won’t be easy.
As for the Panthers, the Cowboys may be 2-7 now, but they’re a different team with Tony Romo in the mix. Road games against the Saints and Giants won’t be a cakewalk either, and the Falcons will look to avoid being swept against their division rivals.
What do you think? When will the Patriots and Panthers lose next? Does either team have a real chance to go undefeated? If not, how many wins do you think they’ll finish with, and will that regular season success translate to postseason wins? Will we see these two teams meet in the postseason?
Weigh in below in the comments section to let us know your thoughts on the NFL’s last two undefeated clubs!
Traded NFL Draft Picks For 2016
While many 2016 NFL draft picks that get traded won’t be moved until the offseason, or during next year’s draft itself, plenty of selections have already changed hands. Unlike in 2015’s draft, no teams have surrendered a first-round pick for 2016 in a trade, but at least one pick in each of the other six rounds has been dealt.
Listed below are the 2016 draft picks that have been included in trades so far. In addition to the selections which will change hands no matter what happens between now and the 2016 draft, we’ve also included several picks which were conditionally traded. If we have information on what conditions must be met for those picks to be moved, those details have been included as well.
In some cases, those conditions have been included even if they won’t be met. For instance, the Eagles would have received a fourth-round pick from the Rams if Sam Bradford had played less than 50% of the team’s snaps this season. However, with Bradford having played every single one of Philadelphia’s offensive snaps for the first nine weeks, that pick won’t change hands.
Finally, a handful of picks were traded by teams holding multiple selections in a given round, meaning it’s not entirely clear which pick will change hands. For example, when the Broncos moved up in the 2015 draft to nab Shane Ray, they sent a 2016 fifth-round pick to the Lions. However, Denver held both its own fifth-round pick and Baltimore’s fifth-rounder at the time of that trade, so it’s not known which of those two picks was sent to Detroit.
This list will continue to be updated throughout the offseason, and can be found anytime on our right-hand sidebar under the PFR Features menu. Be sure to check back after trades have been consummated for an updated look at which picks are on the move for 2016. If you have any corrections, please contact us.
Here are 2016’s traded draft picks:
Updated 4-20-16
Round 1
- Browns acquired pick from Eagles in deal for No. 2 overall pick.
- Dolphins acquired pick from Eagles in deal for CB Byron Maxwell, LB Kiko Alonso.
- Eagles acquired pick from Browns in deal for No. 2 overall pick.
- Eagles acquired pick from Dolphins in deal for CB Byron Maxwell, LB Kiko Alonso.
- Rams acquired pick from Titans in deal for No. 1 overall pick.
- Titans acquired pick from Rams in deal for No. 1 overall pick.
Round 2
- Patriots acquired pick from Cardinals in deal for DE/OLB Chandler Jones.
- Rams acquired pick from Eagles in deal for QB Sam Bradford.
- Titans acquired two picks from Rams in deal for No. 1 overall pick.
Round 3
- Browns acquired pick from Eagles in deal for No. 2 overall pick.
- Eagles acquired pick from Lions in deal for DT Gabe Wright.
- Titans acquired pick from Rams in deal for No. 1 overall pick.
Round 4
- Bears acquired pick from Patriots in deal for TE Martellus Bennett.
- Browns acquired pick from Eagles in deal for No. 2 overall pick.
- Eagles acquired pick from Titans in deal for RB DeMarco Murray.
- Rams acquired pick from Titans in deal for No. 1 overall pick.
- Ravens acquired pick from Broncos in deal for C Gino Gradkowski.
- Titans acquired pick from Eagles in deal for RB DeMarco Murray.
Round 5
- 49ers acquired pick from Chargers in deal for RB Melvin Gordon.
- Broncos acquired pick from Jets in deal for T Ryan Clady.
- Broncos acquired pick from Ravens in deal for C Gino Gradkowski.
- Chiefs acquired pick from Seahawks in deal for S Kelcie McCray.
- Eagles acquired pick from Steelers in deal for CB Brandon Boykin.
- Lions acquired pick from Broncos in deal for OLB Shane Ray.
- Raiders acquired pick from Cowboys in deal for WR Brice Butler.
- Texans acquired pick from Patriots in deal for WR Keshawn Martin.
Round 6
- 49ers acquired pick from Broncos in deal for TE Vernon Davis.
- 49ers acquired pick from Cowboys in deal for TE Geoff Swaim.
- Bears acquired sixth-round pick from Panthers‘ in deal for DE Jared Allen.
- Buccaneers acquired pick from Washington in deal for S Dashon Goldson.
- Chargers acquired pick from Vikings in deal for T Jeremiah Sirles.
- Cowboys acquired pick from Raiders in deal for WR Brice Butler.
- Jaguars acquired pick from Steelers in deal for K Josh Scobee.
- Lions acquired pick from Seahawks in deal for CB Mohammed Seisay.
- Patriots acquired pick from Texans in deal for WR Keshawn Martin.
- Raiders acquired pick from Colts in deal for LB Sio Moore.
- Rams acquired pick from Titans in deal for No. 1 overall pick.
- Texans acquired pick from Jets in deal for QB Ryan Fitzpatrick.
- Titans acquired pick from Falcons in deal for G Andy Levitre.
- Vikings acquired pick from 49ers in deal for LB Gerald Hodges.
- Washington acquired pick from Saints in deal for CB Damian Swann.
(Note: Bears acquired sixth-round pick from Patriots in deal for LB Jon Bostic. However, Patriots later acquired pick back in deal for TE Martellus Bennett.)
Round 7
- Broncos acquired pick from 49ers in deal for TE Vernon Davis.
- Broncos acquired pick from Texans in deal for T Chris Clark.
- Dolphins acquired pick from Ravens in deal for CB Will Davis.
- Eagles acquired pick from Cardinals in deal for QB Matt Barkley.
- Jets acquired pick from Broncos in deal for T Ryan Clady.
- Patriots acquired pick from Texans in deal for QB Ryan Mallett.
- Seahawks acquired pick from Cowboys in deal for RB Christine Michael.
- Steelers acquired pick from Giants in deal for P Brad Wing.
- Texans acquired pick from Rams in deal for QB Case Keenum.
- Vikings acquired pick from Bills in deal for QB Matt Cassel.
- Washington acquired pick from Buccaneers in deal for S Dashon Goldson.
Lost draft picks
- Patriots lost first-round pick due to NFL discipline (Deflategate).
- Chiefs lost third-round pick due to NFL discipline (tampering).
- Falcons lost fifth-round pick due to NFL discipline (fake crowd noise).
- Rams lost fifth-round pick after using it in 2015 supplemental draft on T Isaiah Battle.
ProSportsTransactions.com was used in the creation of this post.
PFR Originals: 11/8/15 – 11/15/15
The original content and analysis produced by the PFR staff during the past week:
- I examined the extension case for Panthers cornerback Josh Norman, arguing that even if he is franchise-tagged by Carolina, he should still approach the $14MM AAV earned by Darrelle Revis, Patrick Peterson, and other top CBs.
- Zach Links rounded up the best of the football blogs in the latest edition of Pigskin Links.
Extension Candidate: Josh Norman
While the contributions from quarterback Cam Newton are obvious, it’s been the Panthers defense that has carried the club to two consecutive playoff appearances and an undefeated record in 2015. That unit, which ranked third in Football Outsiders’ DVOA in 2013 before slipping to 15th in 2014, has rebounded to the second overall position this season. The club’s defense has been headlined by several stars in the past, from standout linebackers Luke Kuechly and Thomas Davis to veteran defensive end Charles Johnson, but this year there is one star who stands head-and-shoulders above the rest: cornerback Josh Norman.
Norman, a fifth-round pick out of Coastal Carolina in 2012, was a starter for much of his rookie season before being benched late in the year, and his struggles continued during his sophomore season, during which he was active for only seven games. But after veterans Drayton Florence and Captain Munnerlyn departed prior to the 2014 season, Norman worked his way back into the starting lineup, and by year’s end, was already in the top-10 cornerback conversation.
2015, however, has witnessed an altogether dominant Norman, as he’s emerged as a shutdown corner capable of unhinging opponents’ passing-game plans. Through eight games, Norman has posted four interceptions, two of which he’s returned for touchdowns, while defensing 13 passes. Per Pro Football Focus’ advanced metrics (subscription required), he rates as the top corner in the league, recording an overall grade of 95.2 (on PFF’s new 1-100 scale).
Going game-by-game, it’s clear the Norman has disrupted the production of some of the game’s best wideouts. In week 1, Norman held Texans receiver DeAndre Hopkins (now the NFL’s third-leading receiver) to just five catches for 53 yards. Tampa Bay’s Mike Evans and Indianapolis’ T.Y. Hilton saw similar struggles against Norman, posting just 3-32 and 1-15 lines, respectively. Last month, PFF’s Sam Monson penned an excellent breakdown of Norman’s play, with this amazing nugget tucked within: Through six games, Norman had allowed an opposing passer rating of just 24.1. A QB’s passer rating if he simply threw the ball into the ground every play? 39.6, 15.5 points better than throwing at Norman.
Unfortunately for the Panthers, they’ve failed to reach an extension agreement with Norman in the year-plus that he’s been eligible for such a deal. Prior to this season, Norman reportedly turned down a long-term contract that would have paid him $7MM annually, a decision that is now proving astute. He’ll now hit unrestricted free agency in March, and having earned a total of just $2.3MM via his rookie contract, he’s surely looking for a big payday.
Luckily for us, there have been several top-notch corners signed to extensions in recent years, so we have a nice crop of deals to use as comparables. Here are the five contracts that Norman and his representatives will likely use as a basis during negotiations, sorted by guaranteed money:

Maxwell, who, it should be noted, signed a free agent contract and not an extension, sets the floor in terms of annual value at $10.5MM, but realistically, Norman should garner much more than that. His target is surely $14MM per annum, the mark reached by Revis, Peterson, and Sherman, each of whom are considered among the top corners in the league. And given his play over the past two seasons, there is no reason Norman shouldn’t be able to secure that figure.
The guarantee is likely to be where Norman and the Panthers have some disagreement. Revis was able to get $39MM in guaranteed money, but he has played the free agent game masterfully during his career, and created a demand that Norman is unlikely to gin up. Additionally, Revis was orchestrating negotiations without the threat of the franchise tag hanging over his head, an issue Norman will likely be unable to avoid.
There’s no question in my mind that, failing an extension, the Panthers will slap Norman with the franchise tag. Last year’s cornerback figure was a tad over $13MM, so for the sake of discussion, let’s assume the 2016 number will be somewhere around $14MM. Currently, Carolina only has about $16MM in cap space for the 2016 season, but the club has several moves it can make to clear out cap room. Jared Allen ($8.5MM cap charge), Roman Harper ($4.66MM), Michael Oher ($4.5MM), and Ted Ginn Jr. ($2.35MM) are all candidates to be released during the offseason, so the Panthers can create space if they want to.
So, based on my assumption that Norman will be negotiating solely with the Panthers, and not with the other 31 clubs, it’s going to be hard for him to challenge Revis’ $39MM figure. Obviously, the $14MM (or so) franchise tag guarantee would act as a guarantee floor, so Norman will have already topped Sherman in that regard. Ultimately, I think he’ll be able pass all the corners besides Revis in terms of guarantee, so something like a five-year, $70MM deal, with $25-28MM in guarantees, makes sense.
If Norman is somehow not franchise-tagged and is able to market himself to the entire league, his contract ceiling would raise incredibly. Not only would his play speak for itself, but next year’s corner market is full of older players like Adam Jones and Sean Smith, and slot corners like Casey Hayward, so Norman wouldn’t face much in the way of market competition. Norman could break the glass ceiling of $14MM annually, and come even closer to Revis’ $39MM guarantee.
Panthers general manager Dave Gettleman has instituted a policy of not negotiating extensions in-season, so unless he changes his mind, Norman will have to wait until next year to begin talks. But assuming he maintains his health and continues to play as a shutdown corner, Norman will have the opportunity to ask for the moon — and maybe get it.
Image courtesy of USA Sports Images.
PFR Originals: 11/1/15 – 11/8/15
The original content and analysis produced by the PFR staff during the past seven days:
- Now that Week 9 is upon us, players who were placed on the injured reserve list with a designation to return are now eligible to be activated for the remainder of the season. Luke Adams provides a rundown of said players, a list that includes Dee Milliner, Bryan Stork, and David Cobb.
- The 2015 trade deadline came and went last Tuesday, leading Luke to break down the entire slate of 2015 trades (all 68 of them!).
- This year’s trade deadline was relatively uneventful, and some have argued that activity would increase were the deadline to be moved back a few weeks. Luke tackled that topic during last week’s Community Tailgate, a forum for readers to add their thoughts on a selected issue.
- Luke also went over the cap outlook for the 2016 Patriots, noting that New England has a large group of players — Chandler Jones, Dont’a Hightower, and Brandon LaFell among them — who could be candidates for an extension.
- Zach Links rounded up the best of the football blogs in the latest edition of Pigskin Links.
2016 Cap Outlook: New England Patriots
Through the 2015 NFL season, Pro Football Rumors will be looking ahead to the 2016 offseason, gauging the salary cap situation for each of the league’s 32 teams. The cap for 2016 hasn’t been set yet, but we can still assess the salary commitments made by a club and determine whether or not that club will be in good financial shape going forward.
In addition to evaluating each team’s overall cap situation, we’ll focus in on a few key players who may be candidates to be extended, restructured, or released by their current teams. These lists aren’t comprehensive, and depending on a player’s 2015 performance and health, he could drop off one of these lists – or be added to one – as the season goes on. For now though, these are some players to watch.
Using data from Over The Cap, we’re making our way through the 32 NFL teams in order of total salary commitments for 2016. Today’s team is the Patriots, who currently have the third-most money on their ’16 cap.
Let’s dive in….
Top 10 cap hits for 2016:
- Tom Brady, QB: $15,000,000
- Jerod Mayo, LB: $11,400,000
- Nate Solder, LT: $10,697,666
- Devin McCourty, S: $8,000,000
- Chandler Jones, DE: $7,799,000
- Dont’a Hightower, LB: $7,751,000
- Jabaal Sheard, DE/OLB: $7,000,000
- Danny Amendola, WR: $6,866,666
- Rob Gronkowski, TE: $6,650,000
- Sebastian Vollmer, RT: $6,270,834
Current 2016 cap number for top 51 players: $145,244,259
Much has been made of Brady’s team-friendly contract structure, and the fact that he has a 2016 cap hit of $15MM rather than $25MM certainly allows the team the flexibility to spend a little more elsewhere. Despite Brady’s relatively modest cap number, New England still has the fourth-highest total of cap commitments for 2016, since the club has plenty of moderately priced players on its books. In total, the Pats are carrying 10 cap charges of $6MM+, and 14 of $4MM+.
Candidates for extension:
- Marcus Cannon, T
- Dont’a Hightower, LB
- Chandler Jones, DE
- Brandon LaFell, WR
- Rob Ninkovich, DE
- Jabaal Sheard, OLB
- Sebastian Vollmer, RT
This list of Patriots extension candidates is far from complete, but even so, it’s still a lengthy one, with plenty of players set to have their contracts expire after the 2016 season.
The club may ultimately have to decide between Cannon and Vollmer, rather than extending both. After Nate Solder went down with a season-ending biceps injury in October though, both tackles have stepped up and performed well, proving their worth. Vollmer has the larger 2016 cap charge, at $6.27MM, so if New England wants to extend one of the two, it could be easier to do a deal with him to reduce that number.
On the other side of the ball, Hightower and Jones both had their fifth-year options for 2016 picked up earlier this year, and have played very well since then, making them logical extension candidates. Jones, in particular, is someone New England will look to lock up long-term, given his contributions to the club’s pass rush — he’s tied for the NFL lead with 8.5 sacks so far this season. On the other side of the defensive line, Ninkovich isn’t quite the force that Jones is, but he recorded eight sacks in each of his last three seasons, so if the price is right, the Pats would presumably like to have him back.
LaFell and Sheard, meanwhile, are hardly slam-dunk extension candidates — depending on how the rest of this season plays out, it’s possible that both players are released in the offseason, since doing so would create a total of $7.8MM in cap savings.
Still, both players have produced when they’ve been healthy, with Sheard racking up four sacks in five games this season, while LaFell totaled 953 receiving yards and seven TDs a year ago. Sheard has been sidelined by an ankle injury in recent weeks, and LaFell has struggled with drops since coming off the PUP list, so we’ll probably have to wait and see how they finish the season to get an idea of whether the Pats will be more inclined to extend or release them this winter. The team may also simply let them play out the final year of their respective contracts in 2016.
Candidates for restructure:
- Nate Solder, LT
Prior to suffering his season-ending biceps injury, Solder signed a modest two-year extension that will keep him under contract through the 2017 campaign. That new deal ensures that there would be plenty of dead money on the Patriots’ cap if they were to cut him in 2016 and rely on Vollmer and Cannon, so Solder figures to return to his starting role on the offensive line if and when he makes a full recovery.
Having said that, his $10.7MM cap hit for 2016 is the third-highest on the roster, so restructuring his deal to lower that number is a possibility if the Pats need some wiggle room next season. If that flexibility isn’t required, the club will probably keep Solder’s contract as is, to avoid pushing more potential dead money to the 2017 season.
Candidates for pay cut or release:
- Danny Amendola, WR
- Scott Chandler, TE
- Jerod Mayo, LB
Amendola has been effective for the Patriots, but with several other receivers, tight ends, and running backs vying for targets, the veteran wideout isn’t always a consistent part of the passing game — although he has been targeted at least nine times in two games this season, he has just 14 total targets in his other five games. He’ll have two years left on his contract after this season, but with a base salary of $5MM owed to him in 2016, the Pats could create more than $4MM in cap savings by cutting him.
Chandler, like Amendola, is something of a luxury in the passing game for the Patriots. He only plays about a third of the team’s offensive snaps, and has been targeted 15 times through seven games. He’s a useful piece, but New England may be inclined to free up $2MM+ in cap room by releasing him and identifying a younger, cheaper alternative.
As for Mayo, he currently projects to have the Patriots’ second-highest cap number in 2016 behind Brady. He won’t be back at that price. The final two seasons of Mayo’s contract are option years, and the Pats figure to turn down their option this winter, allowing the linebacker to hit free agency unless he’s able to work out a significantly-reduced salary to remain in New England.
Contract information from Over The Cap was used in the creation of this post.
Community Tailgate: NFL Trade Deadline
As the NFL season reaches its halfway point, there are plenty of topics and storylines to discuss, and PFR’s Community Tailgate is designed to address those stories. What’s the Community Tailgate all about? Well, it’s pretty simple. We’ll highlight one of the top stories going on in the NFL. Then, in the comment section below, we want you to weigh in and let us know what you think.
Of course, while the debate may get spirited, we ask that it all stays respectful. If you need a reminder of our rules, please check out our commenting policy. Basically, we ask that you refrain from inappropriate language, personal insults, and attacks. Speaking of commenting: we’ve made it much easier to leave a comment here at Pro Football Rumors. You are no longer required to be a registered user – simply put in your name, email address, and comment and submit.
The NFL’s trade deadline came and went this week without much fanfare, unless you happen to be a fan of the Broncos. General manager John Elway pulled off a trade for 49ers tight end Vernon Davis on Monday, and nearly landed Browns left tackle Joe Thomas in a last-minute deal on Tuesday. Otherwise though, things were mostly quiet around the league, with a handful of rumors and whispers not amounting to much.
That inactivity is nothing new in the NFL, where teams are typically hesitant to try to incorporate an incoming player into a new system or scheme halfway through the season, without that player having the benefit of a full training camp to get up to speed.
Still, occasionally teams are willing to roll the dice, as the Broncos did with Davis. The veteran tight end may not have the same rapport he’d have with Peyton Manning if the two players had been working together all year, but Denver is betting that the longtime Niner will still be able to make an impact down the stretch.
So what might make more teams willing to take a chance like that? Moving the trade deadline back a little is one option. The NFL moved the deadline from Week 6 to Week 8 a few years back, but many teams that might be sellers are still reluctant to write off their seasons in late October. Moving the deadline back several more weeks to late November might be one way to encourage activity.
Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk took the idea a step further this week, arguing that there’s no reason to limit trades at all before Week 17. As long as a team is still playing games, it should still be able to make trades, in Florio’s view. That means a playoff team couldn’t make a trade with a club whose season has ended, but up until the end of the regular season, deals should be permitted, Florio argues.
Such a format would allow teams who have been eliminated from the playoffs to move players for future assets. Meanwhile, a team that has clinched a playoff berth, or perhaps a club that is vying for a Wild Card spot, might be more likely to bring in a potential missing piece, with the finish line in sight.
What do you think? Is the NFL’s trade deadline fine as is? Should the league consider moving it back a few more weeks, or abolishing it altogether? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below!
