Latest On Anthem Debate

While only a handful of players were engaged in the racial inequality-based protests at the end of last season, owners are discussing this issue extensively at the latest set of meetings this week. As of Tuesday night, no agreement is imminent, Judy Battista of NFL.com reports (on Twitter), but more discussion is on tap for Wednesday. And some potential resolutions have surfaced.

The prospect of the NFL leaving this issue up to individual teams was rumored earlier this month, but an odd wrinkle of protests actually affecting games came up on Tuesday. SI.com’s Albert Breer tweets owners discussed that if the home team decides this game will feature teams coming out for the anthem instead of remaining in the locker room, 15-yard penalties will ensue for a team that has players kneeling.

As could be expected, this proposition received steady criticism on social media. One owner told the Los Angeles Daily News’ Vincent Bonsignore a player’s decision to kneel during the anthem leading to a 15-yard penalty is “the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard” (Twitter link).

Nevertheless, John Mara expects a resolution by Wednesday (Twitter link via NFL.com’s Ian Rapoport). Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk does not expect this resolution to be well-received, writing that the NFL gave players the right to protest and affirmed it the past two seasons. Ending it now without a negotiation will cause problems.

One owner added, via Battista, he doesn’t believe the NFL is eager to create a uniform policy here after the controversy has diminished, to some degree, since it exploded last season after President Donald Trump’s attack on protesting players in September. This led to mass protests in Week 3. This owner told Battista he believes not much good can be accomplished by alienating players or the president by implementing an edict this week. However, Battista adds other owners are concerned about heading into the 2018 season without a policy. The next set of owners’ meetings are in October, and some among the owners fear another news development could leave the league flat-footed if more players take up protests. An owner also told Battista the “let the teams sort this out” is probably not a viable long-term policy, either, putting the owners who want the NFL to change its current policy in a tough spot.

The league’s current policy was formed in 2009. It encourages players to stand during the playing of the anthem but doesn’t require it. Roughly a third of the owners want that policy to stay in place, per Jim Trotter of NFL.com (on Twitter), and five or six of this contingent wants individual teams to set the policy. Trotter adds several owners agree change must happen, with some being uncertain of what is best here, and some said keeping players in the locker room during the anthem is best (Twitter link). Twenty-four votes are required for a new policy to pass.

Florio adds that the owners appear to be merely hoping this issue goes away and hoping Trump, whom he notes many among this group do not hold in high regard, stops bringing this issue up. Florio does not expect that to happen, regardless of what is decided this week. A persistent critic of these protests, Jerry Jones said (via Tom Pelissero of NFL.com, on Twitter) he indeed wants this issue to go away so the NFL can “move forward where we’ve got our eye on making the NFL and anybody that’s interested in it thinking about what’s going on on the field.”

View Comments (14)