The hold-ins keeping Terry McLaurin and Trey Hendrickson off the field have come to an end this week. No resolution on the Micah Parsons front appears imminent, however.
Parsons’ trade request still stands, and the thought of a departure from the Cowboys will remain a talking point until and unless an extension agreement can be reached. By and large, teams do not view a Parsons trade as being viable and Dallas does not intend to pull off a deal. At least one potential suitor is worth watching in this case, though.
Whispers about the Packers looking into a Parsons trade have picked up recently, and Pro Football Talk’s Mike Florio reports the team is indeed “interested.” Of course, that would no doubt apply to any number of potential landing spots for the All-Pro edge rusher, and Florio cautions Green Bay’s interest is “nowhere near the smoke that’s out there.”
When speaking to the media on Wednesday, Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst was asked about the late-summer trade market. Without mentioning Parsons by name, he left the door open to a notable move taking place. If Green Bay were to swing a deal, pass rush could represent a logical target.
“You’re never one player away, but good players make impacts,’ Gutekunst said (via Ryan Wood of USA Today). “Any time there’s a player of that caliber you can acquire, you’re trying to.”
Parsons and Cowboys owner Jerry Jones have escalated tensions over a lack of communication involving agent David Mulugheta regarding extension talks. Any new deal which is reached will no doubt make him the highest-paid edge rusher in the NFL, something Jones has stated he communicated a willingness over to Parsons when the two spoke this spring. In the absence of a long-term pact, though, a campaign spent on the fifth-year option is in store.
Parsons is slated to collect $24.01MM this season as a result, although Florio reports a grievance was filed earlier this offseason regarding the value of the one-year tender. Edge rushers often encounter situations such as this based on the variance in value between outside linebackers and defensive ends. Parsons is currently viewed by the Cowboys as a DE, something which would drop his option value to $21.32MM. The former Defensive Rookie of the Year and his camp, by contrast, are attempting to have him classified as an OLB.
A number Parsons’ Pro Bowl and All-Pro nods have come with him listed as a linebacker, but the key determinant in this situation is his most common position played in 2023 (his third NFL season). Circumstances such as this often result in a compromise being agreed to between team and player regarding the option value, but the Parsons-Jones relationship is – at least publicly – rather strained at the moment. That could complicate efforts to resolve this matter, which is of course small in comparison to extension talks.
A back issue has been present in Parsons’ case for much of the summer while he has remained a non-participant in training camp. The 26-year-old recently underwent an MRI which came back clean, but this layer to the ongoing saga may not be over. NFL Network’s Jane Slater reports Parsons is now seeking a second opinion on his back. It will be interesting to see what becomes of that endeavor.
Eight days remain until the Cowboys kick off the regular season; it remains unclear whether or not Parsons will suit up for that contest. Meanwhile, with a trade potentially seen as feasible, the Packers’ moves over the coming days will be worth watching closely.
Still say Denver makes more sense
Keeps Parsons out of NFC in any event
2025 1st, 2025 3rd
2026 1st, 2026 4th
Nik Bonitto
Nix is on his rookie contract for 4 more years
Youre up against Mahomes and Herbert twice a year
Keeps Parsons away from potential AFC contender
Moves your own disgruntled pass rusher in Bonitto to an NFC team
Since when is Bonito disgruntled? No way Denver is trading two firsts, a third, a fourth, AND Bonito.
Since he hasn’t gotten his contract yet and we are a week away from the season beginning. You can be disgruntled in many ways , there’s varying degrees. There’s parsons disgruntled and there’s Myles Garrett disgruntled.
2 1sts a 3rd and 4th across two drafts and bonitto in contract year is better than 3 1sts a bidding war would cause
Just because someone is known to be in talks on an extension doesn’t mean they’re disgruntled. I haven’t seen any indication of that.
And great as Parsons is, two firsts and a couple of lesser picks would be a realistic return for him without Bonito. The team that trades for him will also likely have to give out the biggest non-quarterback contract in NFL history.
Yeah I’m sure he’s elated to enter the season without a deal already in place coming off a career year and making 5 mill with the threat of a franchise tag looming. Totally ecstatic.
Parsons bidding war could reach 3 1sts.
Jalen Ramsey netted the Jaguars 2 1sts and a 4th. You’re talking about an even more prominent position in pass rusher so a 3rd and contract year player in bonitto coming off a career year isn’t that much more for a more sought after position.
Denver could get what for Bonitto? A high second is they traded him? He had an excellent 2024 after first two seasons being situational. So the track record isn’t there which is reflected in his asking price.
Bonito is just as likely to be days away from an extension being announced as he is to be disgruntled. You’re assuming something that’s far from a certainty. Ramsey went for two first and change. Mack went for two firsts and change. I doubt Parsons would draw three firsts. He certainly wouldn’t draw two firsts, a third, a fourth, and Bonito.
Also I would still bet on the Cowboys signing Parsons.
Still isn’t under contract to date. So he’s more likely disgruntled until he puts pen to paper. Then we can say he’s no longer disgruntled.
So a 3rd and 4th isn’t change despite a 4th being used in the Ramsey deal and 3rd being used in the Mack deal.
“ Ramsey went for two first and change’ (4th). Mack went for two firsts and change (3rd and 6th).”
So they’re change in other deals but not Parsons deal. I guess that makes sense. Double standard and all.
How are you giving up draft picks for a draft that has already happened? Denver can’t trade 2025 picks anymore.
Cause I make typos and constantly ask myself
WHAT YEAR IS IT like robin williams from jumanji
Dallas opens in Philadelphia?
HAHAHAHA
A great night for Parsons to earn his 24, I mean 21.3 million dollars …
First team that offers 3 first and 2 2nd and a 3rd pick. Cowboys done have room anyways
This would be the equivalent to when Reggie signed with GB in the 90s. This would be huge for them to pull off. No reason not to try. Van Ness, a first and whatever else it takes. Get it done.
Start with what Khalil Mack got the Raiders and then add much more. Van Ness is irrelevant to the trade.
Chronic back issues may end up hurting Parsons earning power long term.
The Packers mortgaging their future for this diva would be an even dumber idea than their “tush-push” proposal.