Jon Gruden Defends Antonio Brown

We heard Friday that new Raiders receiver Antonio Brown is expected to rejoin the team shortly, a report that came on the heels of a great deal of Brown-related drama this week. We learned that the foot injury that has been plaguing Brown stemmed from a cryogenic chamber mishap, and we also learned that Brown has been staying away from team practices after being barred from wearing the helmet that he has used throughout his career.

After Oakland’s preseason victory over the Rams last night, head coach Jon Gruden was predictably asked a series of questions about Brown’s status, and Gruden was 100% supportive of his enigmatic superstar. He said (via Grant Gordon of, “[w]e’re gonna support him. And whatever his decision is, we’ll stand by it. But we’re confident he’s going to be a huge factor for the Raiders for years to come.”

Gruden also indicated that the foot injury, which was said to be a result of Brown’s failure to wear proper footwear when he underwent cryogenic therapy, was not actually AB’s fault. Gruden said, “I don’t know what anybody’s writing or anybody thinks, but this foot injury wasn’t his fault. This was a total accident. It really wasn’t his fault and it’s a serious injury. I know some people are smarting at it, but it’s really not a laughing matter. The guy was hurt. He’s innocent, he didn’t do anything wrong.”

With respect to the helmet issue, Gruden added, “the helmet thing is a personal matter to him. He has a strong feeling about what he’s worn on his head and we’re supporting him. We understand the league’s position as well, so we’re in a tough spot. And we hope Antonio is back here soon, because he’s exciting to be around. I’m excited. I got some plays for him, I hope we can start calling them.”

A ruling on Brown’s grievance against the league is expected to be issued soon, but if Brown is forced to wear a different helmet, he will try to hold the league liable for any head injury he may suffer, as a source with knowledge of the hearing tells Daniel Kaplan of The Athletic. The source said, “I think it’ll be interesting if the NFL forces Antonio to wear a different helmet. And he does play and he doesn’t retire as some people have reported he will do. And then he suffers a really severe injury. I’d hate to be the NFL. Because now you’ve forced him into wearing a different type of helmet. And I think at that point, though, the liability will be dramatic.”

Of course, the NFL wants Brown to play in a helmet that is believed to be more resistant to head injuries than the one he has always worn, so it seems that the league would have a strong argument if Brown was made to switch and suffered a head injury. On the surface, it sounds like it would be difficult for Brown to prove that the change was a proximate cause of any injury he may sustain.

Nonetheless, Brown is pulling out all the stops to get what he wants, and Gruden and Raiders fans will just have to continue to hope that he shows up soon.

As Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk writes, the team could force the issue by sending Brown the notorious five-day letter (which, as the name implies, would require Brown to return within five days of the letter). If he doesn’t return, the Raiders would be able to shut him down for the season and absolve themselves of any obligation to pay him, but given Gruden’s comments, it does not sound as if Oakland is preparing to take such an aggressive stance at this point.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

View Comments (13)
newest oldest

13 comments on “Jon Gruden Defends Antonio Brown

  1. sportsfan101

    Very valid point that him or any other player whose forced to switch to new helmets suffers a devastating injury with the new helmet has the right to sue the nfl. Facts will show xyz players old helmet never hurt them and that the new helmet did. NFL is truly stuck between a rock and a hard spot right now.

    • TJECK109

      There is no way to prove whether there were any injuries that have already occurred using his old helmet. He was laid out a few times.

      His behavior almost wants you to believe it’s because of some head trauma.

      • Steven Juris

        Won’t be able to prove it one way or another and the league probably has data to back them up in this case. Could sue, but it’s going to cost you every thing you made and if you lose it’s the street.

  2. JJB0811

    Gruden is gonna fail big time with the Raiders. Trade a 24 year old wr only to over sign a 31 year old wr that quits. Trade 27 year old a sack master LB and then pick up a worn out 30 something V Burrfict (Cinny). Over reach for a LT last draft then have to sign a Pats cast off for major money.

    Nothing he has done shows any planning or logic in terms of a building a team. All he has done is fired the last GM’s picks because they weren’t his.

    If the NFL is worried that the LA teams can’t sell out the venue because of plenty of other options in LA, what do they think a bum franchise will do to attract locals from Vegas?

    • highplainsdriftr

      And Burfict is 28 and plays an entirely different position and role than Mack. Apples and oranges

  3. crosseyedlemon

    Antonio Brown should start worrying because Chucky also made a big deal about how supportive he was of Reggie McKenzie…just before he threw him under the bus.

  4. forwhomjoshbelltolls

    Remember when Mr. Big Chest was treated as some sort of civil rights hero instead of a guy who already had a low IQ before the CTE set in?

    Good times.

Leave a Reply