Doubt Emerging On Rams-Chargers L.A. Deal?

San Diego citizens resoundingly disapproving Measure C on Tuesday sent a clear signal to the city’s desire for public funding to go toward a Chargers downtown stadium. Although the Chargers are currently leaning toward playing 2017 in San Diego, their long-term future seems to point toward Los Angeles.

The Chargers and Rams have agreed in principle on a deal to share a stadium in Inglewood, Calif., reaching that agreement fairly quickly after the Rams received the vote to relocate. But doubt has emerged on the teams following through on striking an official deal, Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk reports. The concern resides at the league level regarding the teams’ ability to share a market and rebuild the Los Angeles fanbase. Rumors have not tabbed Stan Kroenke as being particularly enthusiastic about sharing the coveted market.

For the Rams, that’s a more natural fit given their history as the city’s longest-tenured occupant (1946-94, 2016). The Bolts, though, played in L.A. in 1960 before quickly moving to San Diego to begin their second year of existence. A move back, from a pure fan-interest standpoint, would be puzzling, even if it’s been long-rumored. The Chargers do not possess a top-flight team, having failed to win 10 games in a season since 2009 and would be the second franchise arriving in a market that was dormant for 21 seasons. It’s difficult to see the interest spawning immediately, especially if San Diego-based Chargers fans are reluctant to support a nearby team that left the city.

Nevertheless, the Bolts’ stadium measure failing on this level — it received 43.1 percent of the vote when a two-thirds majority was required — points them out of town. But Dean Spanos potentially keeping his team in San Diego in 2017 would allow the clock to expire on the NFL’s initial agreement, which gives the Chargers until Jan. 15 of next year to move before the Raiders receive that opportunity. An extension on this agreement seems likely, but the Raiders’ complex path to Las Vegas complicates this.

If Dean stays, it’s not because he thinks he can get a stadium in San Diego,” one ownership source said, via Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com. “It’s just because he doesn’t want to take the deal in Inglewood.”

Spanos’ franchise having suffered two stinging defeats regarding a stadium in 2016 lead owners to believe he will relocate to L.A., per La Canfora, with no stealth plan existing to make everyone happy in San Diego. Sources told the writer the Inglewood arrangement would be one Spanos is willing to live with, regardless of the team delaying a move as long as it can.

The Chargers putting a new proposal on a future ballot would give the team more of a chance to find a workable solution for the city since this one came about rather quickly. But unless a California Supreme Court decision results in the super-majority requirement being again reduced to the 50 percent threshold at which Measure C was previously set to face, the Bolts may not have a better option than joining the Rams in Los Angeles. Otherwise, it will mean continuing to play at a 49-year-old stadium they’ve long since resented.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

View Comments (8)
newest oldest

8 comments on “Doubt Emerging On Rams-Chargers L.A. Deal?

  1. bigjonliljon

    Rich owner needs to listen to what fans vote said. Said go build your own stadium with your own fat bank account.

    • Lyle

      I do believe the problem is that while Spanos most definitely has a fat bank account it’s not build stadium fat.

      • JD396

        Not that I know much about Spanos in particular but for whatever it’s worth… most people worth, say, $3 billion don’t have a checking account with $3 billion in it.

  2. Senioreditor

    Instead of devising their own plan, the Chargers need to sit down with all involved parties and agree on a solution that is best for all parties involved or buy a piece of land in San Diego just like he did in Carson and develop it.

    • Richard

      Why do they not consider the 500 million relocation fee Spanos would have to pay to move to LA. That 500 million, the 350 million Spanos was to put in for the new stadium, plus the 100 million the NFL gave Spanos for being a good soldier (getting reemed by the NFL in favor of Kroenke), would only leave them about 300 million short. Could Spanos not get a loan/negotiate with NFL for the amount?

    • SD Speak For Myself

      How does he negotiate with the 60% who said no? Not realistic.

  3. padreforlife

    Spanos from beginning should of focused on renovations for Qualcomm. I think he goes to LA then sells team

  4. TaraGHill

    There is a great way! how you can work at your home using your computer and earn in the same time…Mki… Only basic internet knowledge needed and fast internet connection… Earn as much as £3000 a week…

    Check details >>>………….>>> http://www.NetNote70.com

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.