Latest On Collective Bargaining Agreement

After momentum gradually built for weeks, the prospect of a new collective bargaining agreement being finalized soon took a serious hit Friday. The NFLPA’s board has cancelled a Friday vote on the owners’ proposal, Tom Pelissero of reports (on Twitter).

This comes after the NFLPA’s executive committee voted 6-5 against recommending the owners’ CBA proposal earlier today. Both the NFLPA board and executive committee hope to meet with the NFL again soon, per Pelissero, and the union announced it is planning a vote for next week. The owners have already approved their proposal, though the vote was not unanimous.

Today the NFLPA Board of Player Representatives did not take a vote on the principal terms of a proposed new collective bargaining agreement,” the union’s statement read. “The Executive Committee looks forward to meeting with NFL management again next week before the Board takes a vote shortly after.”

The league wants a resolution on a new CBA by next week, or the 2011 agreement will remain in place for the 2020 league year. The ball may now roll back to the owners. The NFLPA would like to resume discussions next week, but Dan Graziano of notes (via Twitter) the owners did not sound like that would be an option. One owner confirmed more negotiations will not commence, per Adam Schefter of (on Twitter).

This may be posturing, with ownership’s desire to have a new CBA done by March 18 not exactly a secret. Either way, the next several days will be critical toward a new deal and determining how serious the prospect of a 2021 work stoppage will become.

The owners’ push for a 17-game schedule, of course, exists at the crux of this potential impasse. But some union reps who support ratifying the CBA believe they will not get a better deal from the owners going forward, Mike Garafolo of notes (video link), adding that those opposed to moving forward with this proposal want more concessions from the owners to green-light 17 games. Ownership wants to take a ratified CBA to the TV networks to secure landmark contracts, capitalizing on the momentum of the recent ratings rise. Labor peace would obviously help on that front.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

View Comments (14)
newest oldest

14 comments on “Latest On Collective Bargaining Agreement

    • vtncsc

      Eh, I suspect a lot of fans will not side with the players on any future issues.

      I for one can live without it if it came down to it.

      • Senioreditor

        THAT’S the last thing a union should care about. NFL player rights and compensation trail miserably behind baseball and basketball but their sport generates considerably more revenue. Their contacts aren’t guaranteed and they have no certain timeline for free agency. It boggles my mind how they’re represented. It’s almost like their representatives have CTE.

    • You do realise that the people demanding huge changes (longer season, different playoff structure) are the owners. How did that turn into the players’ fault?

      Perhaps you should work on that plantation boss mentality on your part. Particularly as you are not an NFL owner and unlike the players have no real stake here.

      • frank858

        You do realize the owners were also proposing raises to the minimum wage of the league, less preseason games, shorter mandatory offseason practices, and a lot more for the players. Jeff Saturday this morning said that it was a good offer, better than the current one in place and that the players need to give a little back to get this deal done.

          • Just one more regular season game. Nothing much. No big deal. Guess you don’t play professional football. The players barely get through the season as is, without permanent injury.

        • It’s always up to the workers to give back, give more, make accommodations. The NFL owners are getting a very nice ride on the back of their labour. It should be a partnership, not a dictatorship. The capital of the NFL are its talent, not the stadiums.

Leave a Reply