Jadeveon Clowney made plenty of headlines recently with his remarks suggesting the Browns made a concerted effort on multiple occasions to give fellow edge rusher Myles Garrett favorable one-on-one matchups this season. The incident led to the 29-year-old being sent home for the season finale, and provided a further sign that he will be playing elsewhere in 2023.
Earlier this week, however, Clowney apologized to Garrett, who himself had a noteworthy public response to Clowney’s accusations. A statement from the latter said in part, “As a man I have reached out to Myles specifically to apologize. I will continue to learn and grow as a I move forward” (Twitter link via ESPN’s Adam Schefter). Clowney also claimed that his initial remarks were “completely misrepresented” and “taken out of context.”
On that point, Mary Kay Cabot of cleveland.com has since responded that Clowney was quoted verbatim in their interview which included his statement that he had a “5%” chance of re-signing with the Browns this offseason. It remains to be seen if Clowney’s apology will increase the likelihood of another free agent deal being signed between the two parties, or if the former No. 1 pick will depart in a change-of-scenery move.
Here are some other Browns-related notes:
- In light of issues such as defensive performance (which led to DC Joe Woods being fired) and discipline surrounding the team in 2022, questions have been raised regarding whether or not head coach Kevin Stefanski will delegate offensive play-calling duties. Cabot writes that he will likely retain his current role in 2023, however, citing his relationship with quarterback Deshaun Watson and their need to rebuild the playbook together as a main reason (subscription required). The Browns struggled to move the ball through the air this season, one in which Watson was suspended for the first 11 games, but they ranked sixth in the league with an average of 147 yards per game on the ground.
- Watson’s suspension is now over, of course, but his legal battle is not. The embattled signal-caller will be forced to sit for a deposition pertaining to the 26th civil lawsuit filed against him, as detailed by USA Today’s Brent Schrotenboer. After settling most of the claims made against him this summer, Watson, 27, currently faces two outstanding suits alleging sexual misconduct during massage sessions dating back to his time with the Texans.
- Cleveland had one of the most highly-touted backfields this season, led by Nick Chubb and Kareem Hunt. Their third-stringer, D’Ernest Johnson, also flashed plenty of potential in 2021 when called upon as a spot-starter, though, leading to expectations that he could replicate his success during this campaign. He received only 11 touches all year, however, something which he explained, via Chris Easterling of the Akron Beacon Journal, was a major source of frustration. The 26-year-old added that he has not yet head from the Browns regarding a new deal, signalling that he will head elsewhere in search of a larger workload in free agency.
At this point Clowney is a solid player against the run. That’s about it. Totally unrealistic to have major expectations of him now. He seems to think he’s still a superstar. I’d stay way the heck away if I were a GM.
I know the game dictates a lot in the play call but IMO someone else definitely needs to handle the play calling. Although Chubb was one of the top rushers in the league this year how many times in the second half of games was he on the sideline or they’d establish the run and then completely go away from it. All in all the season wasn’t a total failure a lot of close games could have been wins that were losses. I think a new DC fixes some issues a lot of young talent on this team I think Stefanski needs to hand off play calling duties and see what happens.
Clowney also claimed that his initial remarks were “completely misrepresented” and “taken out of context.” Gee, that’s something that we haven’t heard before (from anyone).
I’m not NFL genius, more of a basketball guy.
But doesn’t it make sense to line your best pass rushers in favourable 1v1 match ups.
That way you have a better of pressuring or sacking the QB which will lead to more wins.
Yes it might suck a little to be the other edge rushers constantly having a “tougher” match up. But if it allows your team to be successful should you be happy to do your role.
Draymond Green is a former all star, DPOY and likely future ball of famed and his stat lines are roughly 10-7-7. Looks terrible but he does all the hard stuff and because of that it allows the likes of Curry Klay and Poole to shine.
Clowney just seems like a egotistical loser
I suppose the disadvantage is that you’re not using both rushers to their full potential. Moving just one of them around to the easiest matchup means that you’re only getting pressure from that one player, instead of from both. Whatever it takes to get pressure, though, seems to be the ideal for me if I were coaching. If you have someone who can move all over, I say move him all over.
If, however, you’re forcing the issue to the detriment of the team’s ability to pressure, then that would be an issue (I.e., moving a guy to the left side so he can do his one job and now forcing the other three guys to change up what they do to compensate). I’m not sure if that was the case or not, but that would be the counter argument.
Whatever the plan it was, at the end of the day, it doesn’t seem to have worked. I’d say that has more to do with the lack of production from the interior defensive linemen in Cleveland, but Woods obviously was not terribly impressive as is.
If the Browns finish below .500 next season, Stefanski will probably be fired.
Oh there’s no doubt about that. Plus he’s Dutch.