While loosely connected to Ty Simpson entering the draft, the Rams were viewed as more likely to add a player that helped their strong 2026 roster compete for a Super Bowl title. In a move eerily similar to the Packers’ Jordan Love pick six years ago, the Rams came out of Round 1 with Simpson — who may well sit behind Matthew Stafford for multiple seasons.
Discussions about this pick pivoted from whether Simpson was a reach at No. 13 to whether Sean McVay was enthused about the selection. McVay’s post-draft presser left plenty to be desired on the latter front. For instance, McVay made this comment shortly after the choice:
“There were a lot of players that we liked, but when you do look at it, I think the thing you liked about the body of work is … let’s make one thing clear, this is Matthew’s team,” McVay said. “You get a chance to be able to address the backup quarterback.”
[RELATED: Rams Considered Joe Flacco In Free Agency]
This situation technically makes Simpson the backup quarterback — McVay went as far as to say Simpson will compete with disappointing holdover Stetson Bennett for the gig — but the Rams paid Jimmy Garoppolo barely $3MM to handle that role over the past two years. Dynamics in play here certainly separate this from merely staffing the QB2 job. With the exception of the Packers’ three-year Love developmental plan, QBs chosen in Round 1 play as rookies or, at the latest, by Year 2. Stafford is going into an age-38 season and is expected to sign an extension soon.
The Packers did add Love ahead of a Rodgers MVP season, but Stafford coming off an MVP campaign and seeing his team draft his successor is uncovered ground. No team rostering a reigning MVP quarterback has chosen another passer in the first or second round since the 1970 merger. But that is Stafford’s reality now. While this situation differs from the clunky Kirk Cousins–Michael Penix Jr. setup, as Stafford is unlikely to be benched anytime soon, a clock is almost certainly in place on his Rams tenure — rather than a Super Bowl frontrunner augmenting his current roster.
Makai Lemon was “definitely” in the mix to go to L.A. at 13, according to ESPN.com’s Jeremy Fowler, but this does not appear to have been a McVay-Les Snead power struggle. A personnel source informed Fowler that Simpson being there at 13 meant the Rams were taking him, going so far as to say the Alabama prospect compared favorably to No. 1 overall pick Fernando Mendoza by some in the team’s building.
McVay “absolutely” was onboard with the pick, another source told Fowler, with a separate team source indicating the duo was in lockstep by “all indications.”
“I think Sean had a chat with Matthew before last night. And that’s one thing that Matthew’s definitely earned,” Snead said, via The Sedano and Cap Morning Show (h/t Pro Football Talk’s Myles Simmons) “It’s one of the things that we’re working together to go through it. Matthew is on his way to, I would say this, a Hall of Fame career, right? And he still has gas left in the tank. And big picture, our vision’s always been, ‘Hey, let’s make the most of this time with Matthew and his teammates — let’s chase special together, however long that may [last].’ There’s no timeline on this. The longer, the better. Matthew just came off an MVP season, so if he continues playing, it’s like, this is better for everyone involved.
“And I think at the end of the day, Sean and I are going to always work together in these types of decisions. … But there was a lot that was going on into maneuvering that draft. So, we’re in lockstep. We work together. We’re collaborative. It’s him and I partnering to try to do the best for the Rams.”
Snead played in the SEC (at Auburn) around the same time Simpson’s father (Jason) was at Mississippi State. Jason Simpson, the longtime HC at Tennessee-Martin, consulted with Snead on whether Ty should declare for the draft or stay in college. Snead said Ty was a first-round-level talent, NFL.com’s Tom Pelissero notes. Simpson received $5MM and then $6.5MM offers from Miami to transfer there for the ’26 season, according to Pelissero. Snead had his eye on Simpson dating back to the fall, CBS Sports’ Jonathan Jones notes.
These discussions commenced before Alabama’s Rose Bowl game. Miami’s second offer would have compared to a second-round guarantee, but Simpson’s No. 13 overall pact will be worth $25.77MM fully guaranteed (per OverTheCap). When Ty’s parents discussed the QB’s future with Snead before his draft declaration, Pelissero indicates the longtime Rams GM conveyed a real possibility the Rams would draft him in the first round. (While the Rams’ draft slot was not known at that point, L.A. knew where its Atlanta-obtained pick would land since the Falcons’ season had ended.)
Simpson declared for the draft Jan. 7 — three days after the Falcons’ season wrapped — and the Rams carried a rare opportunity to find a Stafford heir apparent. The team’s draft slot regularly comes outside the top 20; it landed at No. 29 this year. The Rams traded their own pick to the Chiefs for Trent McDuffie, and the draft community had viewed that swap as a decision that would likely send Simpson elsewhere. The Rams were viewed as high on Simpson but were considered more likely to draft him at 29 than at 13 (or via a trade-down from 13).
Even if this was a Snead-based pick, McVay has held tremendous input since arriving in L.A. nine years ago. A source familiar with the organization’s inner workings told FanSided’s Jason La Canfora that McVay “pulls all the triggers, and especially on a quarterback.” It would be highly unlikely a coach with McVay’s track record would be overruled by his GM, leading some in the league to view McVay’s lack of post-draft enthrallment for the pick as performative for Stafford’s benefit.
McVay indeed called Stafford on Thursday, per Jones. This differed from the Falcons’ approach, as they famously did not call Cousins before the Penix pick. Stafford is on a different QB tier than Cousins, and while it will be interesting to hear the veteran passer’s thoughts on the move, Simpson will be expected to sit for a while. The move also came partially due to Garoppolo uncertainty, per Fowler, though that assuredly played a small part in this. Garoppolo, whom the Rams had wanted back, is considering retirement.
McVay said (via Jones) he does not believe this pick will affect Stafford extension talks. The Rams have reached revised deals with their five-year starter in each of the past two offseasons, but with the QB unsigned for 2027, a true extension is on the docket this year.
Stafford pursued a $50MM-plus-AAV deal last year, being allowed to explore a trade, but backed down — after aggressive Raiders and Giants pushes — and signed a reworked Rams pact that brought a $40MM early guarantee. Simpson’s status aside, Stafford will still carry considerable leverage in Rams talks. Though, it is worth wondering if Simpson’s arrival will affect how much in future guarantees the Rams will want to offer.
Tied closely to the Rams coming into the draft, Lemon fell to 20th (via an Eagles trade-up in front of the Steelers). The Rams also considered tight end Kenyon Sadiq, per Fowler, who adds Caleb Downs — had he fallen to 13 — was on the team’s radar. Dallas traded up one spot to ensure it landed Downs at No. 11. The Rams have pursued a young weapon in each of the previous two first rounds. They sought Brock Bowers in 2024 and made an offer for No. 8 overall — believed to be a Tetairoa McMillan aim — in 2025. They also were linked to Emeka Egbuka in last year’s first round.
That makes the Simpson-over-Lemon call interesting, but if the Rams are right on the passer (and they certainly have an optimal setup to develop one given McVay’s success), that will end up being the right play long term.
The Rams also received calls from teams eager to move ahead of the Ravens (at No. 14) for guard Vega Ioane, and while it would have made sense to explore sliding down and picking up assets, the team stood pat. That certainly furthers the belief McVay was firmly in Camp Simpson, despite the Crimson Tide signal-caller being a one-year college starter. Simpson, who was linked to the Cardinals and Jets (among other teams) in this draft, preferred to end up in L.A., Fowler adds.
Green Bay has seen its Love investment pay dividends, though its 2020 squad — despite a Rodgers MVP effort — fell just short of Super Bowl LV. The Packers have not been that close since, with a non-QB first-round pick potentially enough to make the difference in that Buccaneers matchup five Januarys ago. But the Packers have since extended Love, who has become an upper-crust QB. The Rams had not brought in a starter-level draft prospect under McVay, though the HC developed Snead draftee Jared Goff upon arrival.
The Simpson project will be scrutinized, but this will remain Stafford’s show for a while. The extension talks will be the next chapter to follow here, and it will be fascinating how long the Rams truly commit to their likely Hall of Fame-bound starter — and, perhaps, how long he now wants to commit to the team — now that they have his likely replacement rostered.

Nah taking a back up QB with the 13th overall pick who had one year of starter experience definitely improves your Super Bowl chances for the 2026 season
“It’s for the future” lmao rams were literally in the NFC championship game 3 months ago……punting on the 2026 season where who knows how many playoff runs you’ll have left with the current group is wild
Rookie contracts lose a year
Stafford gets a year older
Guys you signed lose a year on their contract
All for a back up QB
Mindboggling
Aged, immobile QBs like Stafford are one solid hit away from having their career end so it makes sense for the Rams to get a backup plan in place. I don’t think Simpson would rate as first round talent in most draft years but he probably won’t suck as bad as Richardson or JJ McCarthy either.
“ Aged, immobile QBs like Stafford are one solid hit away from having their career end”
And Simpson helps prevent that how……
See Makai Lemon helps Stafford get the ball out quicker reducing his need to stay in the pocket taking hits which reduces the chance he gets hurt
A new C though Coleman is fine finished 13th best helps protect him even more up front reducing hits reducing risk of injury
How does Simpson help make sure Stafford the 2025 MVP not get hurt?
My comment had nothing to do with “prevention”…it had everything to do with having a contingency plan ready if Matty can’t play because of an injury.
Agreed. Develop the kid. What’s the harm? If Stafford is healthy all season, wonderful. The kid hopefully learned and improved.
Every year draft gurus give us the baloney that next year the QB pool will be stronger. And every year, it’s the same story. Nice gig those guys have.
I envy Rams fans. They have a loaded team with a great coach. They make moves to shore up problem areas with proven NFL talent. Lemon is right. This was a contingency pick. Makes perfect sense
As a Steelers fan, I’ll trade you any of our QBs including Allar for this kid
So you think a contingency plan is better than planning to protecting last years MVP better?
Who gives them better odds at winning it all in 2026? Stafford or Simpson?
Obvious answer Stafford
Can Simpson lead the rams to a superbowl in 2026 if Stafford get hurt?
The answer is no. A rookie QB has never won a superbowl in the history of the league. But Simpson will supposedly win it all if Stafford gets hurt….
Wasting a pick on a back up QB instead of getting last years MVP and NFC championship game runner up is wild.
You can find contingency plans in free agency or trades.
Yep. Can’t disagree with your logic. I was of the belief that injuries had something to do with the O-line.
Possibly I think it had to do with Puka being their only receiving threat
Adams seemed to have lost a step last year finishing 60 catches for 789 yards. He did have 14 TDs but Rams need Vegas Adams not early Green Bay Adams
Someone like Lemon on quick throws bubbles slants crossers would have helped this year
Helping Stafford get the ball out faster
Last year he averaged 2.55 seconds. You look at Trevor Lawrence who the HC was able to drop his release time to 2.4 seconds and look how Lawrence did last year
Rams getting that release time down under 2.5 would have done significantly more for 2026
You could become rich overnight if you had a formula to eliminate injuries from the game. We’ve seen guys get injured when nobody was within 5 yards of them and other guys injuring themselves with celebrations after the play had ended.
Drafting a rookie QB contingency plan 13th overall is a worse plan than signing
A reclamation project in Murray or Tua and letting McVay work with them like he did Baker
Mariota or Minshew who have proven they can be reliable veteran back ups
Hell if you’re hoping McVay can develop Simpson trade a 6th or 7th for Will Levis and hope he can fix the former 2nd round pick. Leaving Tennessee helped Malik Willis under LaFleur, McVays former assistant coach.
There were options than wasting a 13th overall pick on a 2026 back up QB who don’t improve their superbowl odds for 2026
All these internet GMs think they know more than Snead who has schooled the rest of the league with late rounds
Not until McVay got there. Before his hire, Snead was regularly a central figure in the “who’s going to be gone” rumors.
Snead has done well with picks, and has had some misses. He’s probably a better GM than the Fisher years made him appear, but he’s equally as probably benefitting hugely from having McVay as a coach and showrunner.
That said, I actually don’t hate this pick. This is different from the Rodgers/Love situation because:
1. The Rams’ needs were much less obvious than Green Bay’s, as they were a more complete team. Despite their defensive showing(s) against Seattle, the Rams were mostly regarded as pretty complete team with a handful of spots for improvement.
2. Stafford was L.A.’s best individual player, but their supporting cast contained other superstars (like Nacua, Verse, or Adams, or lesser stars who were effective like Williams), so the team was less dependent on him individually having a great game than the Packers were with Rodgers.
3. The Rams won a Super Bowl recently, and have been competitive since. Green Bay would lose in the playoffs in much more disappointing fashion, and more importantly, more times year after year. The Rams couldn’t be regarded as disappointments who refused to make a move. Green Bay’s biggest needs at that time were needs that were longstanding for years: stability at CB, ILB, TE, and of course WR had been lacking for many years in some of those cases. Even with Adams, the Packers’ next leading receiver that year was Jones, at HB. Lazard hadn’t bloomed yet. To my memory, the Packers didn’t have a single WR who had had more than 40 catches in a season to that point…and yet, they reached the NFCCG.
4…which brings me to this point: the Rams haven’t refused to address their needs the way that Green Bay did. Most noticeably, their biggest advertised need was at CB last year. This year, they added McDuffie from K.C. and signed him to a big extension. So it’s not like they drafted Simpson and neglected their biggest hole, like Green Bay did with WR that year (which also was one of the worst drafts in recent memory for a team).
So, despite the fact that the Rams are still in a window with Stafford, I don’t think that this is like Green Bay with Love. The Rams are a more complete team that have won a championship much more recently. The Rams have, most importantly, definitely made a better effort to address their immediate needs than the Packers did. I’m not Snead’s biggest fan, but you have to admit that he acts with much more urgency than Gutekunst or Thompson did to try and secure that window. Taking Simpson didn’t negate the Rams’ other efforts to shore up other areas of need, which is why this isn’t the worst move in my eyes.
You’re saying Snead is smart for getting his 2025 MVP QB, NFC championship team, their #1 receiver, and running backs……a back up QB for their 2026 season?
You don’t need to be a GM to realize Simpson doesn’t help their 2026 Super Bowl chances
@DroppedBallFour – Did Les Snead bang your girlfriend sometime in the past? Your reaction to this is beyond normal. As for me, I’m going to give the benefit the doubt to a GM and Head Coach who wear Super Bowl rings.
BTW – I ripped Brian Gutekunst for doing this in 2020 with Jordan Love. But it turns out he was right and I was wrong. Lesson learned.
How does Simpson help the rams in 2026? Answer that simple question
“ BTW – I ripped Brian Gutekunst for doing this in 2020 with Jordan Love. But it turns out he was right and I was wrong. Lesson learned.”
You have
0 rings
0 nfc championship appearances
1-3 in the playoffs
If that’s what you call being right dear god your standards are low
@DroppedBallFour – You are an impatient fella, aren’t you? Not every draft pick is expected to help in year 1. Many, perhaps most, don’t provide much value in year 1. A GM who ignores the future to serve the present won’t have a job in the future. Also, Jordan Love is 27. He has plenty of time to win some Super Bowls.
I didn’t say smart, exactly. I just said that I didn’t think that it was the worst. They’ve tried to to unload Stafford a couple of times since the championship win, for some reason or another, before inevitably circling back to redoing his deal. Stafford himself has flirted with retirement, and is up there in age. Now, they’ll have a potential successor onboard in the even that Stafford retires or falls off in the next five years. Smart, maybe, maybe not, in the comparative opportunity cost of selecting another player, but there’s an argument for it. I can’t say that the notion of picking his successor is completely out of bounds, and I don’t think that the Rams are as desperate as the Packers were (or should have been) at the time of Love’s selection.
I also think that they’ve drafted with more urgency, and added more pieces to demonstrate said urgency, over the years to try and capitalize on that window. This is really the only actual long term focused move that I can think of off the top of my head for L.A., which has typically been the area where they’ve been the most laissez-faire under Snead. It’s more of a change of direction for the Rams than it was for Green Bay, who have typically ignored the present windows for some hopeful far-off potential roster building.
Sorry ak my comment was for stuvian not you
My bad, apologies to you as well.
Good pick for the Super Champions’ repeat chances, even if Simpson eventually becomes a killer in LA.
Rams never draft like you think they will. Ignoring Simpson they took another TE in round 2. The only time they really stayed on board was Verse
Gonna be the black sheep here. Great move. Have the kid learn behind Stafford for a year or two. Stafford has flirted with retirement before, he’s old, the rams are a very very good football team and had a chance to pick towards the top of the draft – which likely won’t be the case in the next draft. Get the future QB now, and here’s a crazy thought, put time into developing him. Theyre stacked at the skill positions and they added a TE in round 2. WR would make more of an impact today but if Stafford goes down or retires no one is going nuts for stetson bennet or Jimmy g.
Common sense prevails. Good post.
Do the Rams want to be one and done in 2026 – then rebuild? Or do they want to be competing for it all on a yearly basis? Stafford looked around for another home in 2025, wanted a bigger payday. Don’t blame him, his career will end soon. But the org continues on with or without him. As you say they are stacked at receiver.
It’s a roster build at the most important position for long term success as an org. Doesn’t matter what people think, the Rams believe he can be the guy to get it done. Over time we will see if the FA’s believe it as well.
I said about the same but @DroppedBallFour offers the insights of a fan who follows the team a lot more than I do. Offhand, I look at the Rams as having an explosive offense and as having addressed their secondary issues this offseason
To me, developing a successor to Stafford made sense. But I get the logic here.
Got their tackle in round 3 after taking a tight end. But big gap between round 3 and 6.
I love when teams overreach for a player, then plant the inevitable story from ‘anonymous’ sources that claim other teams were ready to ‘pounce’ on this player, that way the public thinks the GM spotted a talent in the rough.
The Giants did the same thing when they drafted Daniel Jones #6 overall, even though he was mocked to go in the 2nd -3rd round, and claimed there were 2 other teams ready to take him right after the Giants picked. Both teams eventually came out and said they had no intention of picking him.
Let’s see how Ty turns out in 3-4 years.
It’s known the Cardinals were planning to move back into the 1st to take Simpson.
You would have thought they learned their lesson last year. They likely win the Superbowl if they take any defensive player who could’ve started in their back 7, instead of punting the pick to the next year… Nope, they’ve essentially punted the pick again
They used their other 1st round pick of 2026 to trade for CB Trent McDuffie.
The pick came from the Falcons, so perhaps it came with the contingency that it had to be stupid.