The Raiders will have Michael Crabtree back in their starting lineup come Week 14. The NFL reduced the wideout’s two-game suspension to one on Tuesday night, Adam Schefter of ESPN.com reports, adding Aqib Talib‘s two-game ban has also been trimmed to one (Twitter links).
Crabtree will only miss this week’s game against the Giants. The Raiders face the Chiefs in Week 14. Talib will miss Sunday’s Broncos-Dolphins game but be back for Denver’s Week 14 game against the Jets.
The two essentially shared culpability in the widespread brawl that featured the rivals in a rare one-on-one fight scene in the end zone. But a day after the suspensions were handed out, the Raiders and Broncos received word the NFL has softened its stance upon appeals voiced from James Thrash (representing Talib) and Derrick Brooks (representing Crabtree).
Talib will save $570K as a result of Tuesday’s adjusted punishment. Crabtree will save $367K. This will be Talib’s second one-game suspension in three seasons. He missed a November 2015 game as a result of on-field actions against the Colts. Crabtree will miss his second game as a Raider. The veteran pass-catcher played in each of Oakland’s 32 regular-season games during the 2015 and ’16 seasons before missing Week 4 of this season — against the Broncos.
Both Vance Joseph and John Elway stood by Talib during his appeal hearing, Mike Klis of 9News tweets.
The Raiders still could be facing the prospect of playing without Crabtree or Amari Cooper for the first time since the duo became Raiders two seasons ago. Cooper is dealing with a concussion and a sprained ankle. The Broncos will turn to Bradley Roby to start opposite Chris Harris, with third-round rookie Brendan Langley — whom Cooper scored a short touchdown against during Sunday’s Raiders win — filling in as the nickel presence.
Expected
So tough for the NFL to suspend players for any period of time with only 16 games on the schedule unless something is absolutely egregious.
Just suspend the players twice as long as they actually want them out, force them through the appeals process to save face, cut it in half to get the real amount of time they wanted the suspension for in the first place.
The players feel like they won an appeal, the NFL looks like they hand out harsher penalties than they do. Win win for everyone I guess.
It’s the model the follow, and as weird as it is, to your point it makes it appear to be a win/win for everyone.
1/3 the fine of domestic violence seemed steep for two guys fighting on a football field. I’m surprised it doesn’t happen more often considering the physical aspect of the game. Hockey has it…