Tuesday marked the beginning of the Bengals’ mandatory minicamp. In a development which comes as little surprise, the team’s top remaining extension priority is absent.

Edge rusher Trey Hendrickson is away from the team, ESPN’s Adam Schefter reports. The reigning sack leader has been engaged in a long-running stalemate with Cincinnati over an extension. One year remains on his contract, but planned talks on a major raise have not resulted in much progress toward an agreement.

[RELATED: Details On Shemar Stewart’s Rookie Contract Dispute]

The most recent effort on the Bengals’ part came when the team reached out to Hendrickson’s camp yesterday, per Dianna Russini of The Athletic. She adds, though, that the latest communication between the parties did not yield traction on the extension front. Head coach Zac Taylor previously alerted Hendrickson to the threat of fines for skipping this week’s minicamp. That move prompted a public airing of grievances from the All-Pro, who said last month he will not play under his existing pact.

Plenty of time remains to see if that will end up holding true, but team and player are not in a favorable position at this point. Hendrickson was unable to generate talks on a new deal last offseason, and the Bengals dismissed the trade request which followed. The 30-year-old upped his leverage with a second straight 17.5-sack campaign in 2024, although his stance of preferring to remain in Cincinnati has no doubt hindered his efforts to approach the top of the EDGE market.

$40MM per season now represents the ceiling for the position’s market. It is unclear what Hendrickson and his camp have listed as an asking price, but it was recently reported the Bengals have yet to offer a pact at or around $35MM on average. Cincinnati has already committed to big-ticket receiver deals this offseason (with Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins each receiving four-year contracts), and Hendrickson always represented the No. 3 priority on that front.

Unlike 2024, the four-time Pro Bowler received permission to seek a trade this offseason. Plenty of interest has been shown, but at this point a deal sending him out of Cincinnati is not expected. With Hendrickson due to collect $16MM as things stand, a holdout will remain on the table in the absence of progress on an extension agreement. Presuming he remains absent for all three days of minicamp, Hendrickson will be subject to over $104K in fines.

Well into the 2025 offseason, the Trey Hendrickson situation remains far from resolved. A trade sending the reigning NFL sack leader away from the Bengals is not expected by those around the league, but it remains to be seen if an extension agreement will be worked out.

Hendrickson’s efforts to land a lucrative new pact last spring were unsuccessful, and his trade request did not result in talks with interested teams taking place. This time around, the situation changed with the Bengals allowing the All-Pro to seek a trade. Cincinnati set a high asking price, and multiple offers were turned down as an illustration of the team’s desire to keep him in place for at least one more year.

Talks on a long-term pact have not gone according to plan, and both team and player have gone public with their remarks on the state of negotiations. A holdout is a possibility at this point (as is usually the case in at least a few situations around the league this time of year), and Hendrickson himself said last month talks are on hold. Finances will of course be critical in determining how this situation unfolds.

The top of the edge rush market now sits at $40MM annually. While Hendrickson would be hard-pressed to match the value of Myles Garrett‘s new deal, he could aim for one closer to the $35MM-per-season mark. The likes of Danielle Hunter, Maxx Crosby and Nick Bosa are each near that figure, and Hendrickson could look to join them. Albert Breer of Sports Illustrated writes, however, that the Bengals have yet to offer a deal with an AAV at or around $35MM.

As things stand, Hendrickson is due to collect $16MM in 2025 as a result of the short-term arrangement previously made with the team. The 30-year-old faced the opportunity of playing his way into a much more valuable pact last season, and he certainty did so by posting 17.5 sacks for the second straight season. That total helped earn him a fourth straight Pro Bowl nod and brought his Bengals total to 57 in 63 games. A notable raise is in store, but it remains to be seen how far into a new pact the team will be willing to go with respect to guaranteed compensation.

Quarterback Joe Burrow has maintained his support for a Hendrickson extension this offseason, and Breer predicts a deal will ultimately be worked out. Plenty of work remains in this case, though, and it will be interesting to see if the Bengals up their offer when negotiations pick up and if doing so helps to facilitate an agreement.

As the Trey Hendrickson/Bengals staring contest wages on, there’s an increasing sentiment that the saga will lead to an extension agreement or a holdout. As ESPN’s Ben Baby and Jeremy Fowler write, there doesn’t seem to be much momentum surrounding a potential Hendrickson trade.

As the 2024 sacks leader pushed for a new contract, the Bengals allowed the player to seek a trade to a new squad this offseason. According to ESPN, a handful of teams showed interest in extending Hendrickson if they were able to complete a trade with Cincy’s front office. Ultimately, “nothing materialized,” and that’s led to the current stalemate between the two sides.

The Bengals were reportedly seeking at least a first-round pick in return for the All-Pro. Per ESPN, there’s a belief that the organization “either didn’t get an offer including a first-round pick or it rebuffed engaging trade offers in March.” While a suitor could still come out of the woodwork, the general consensus is that Hendrickson will still be on the Bengals roster for the start of the regular season.

So, focus will instead turn to extension negotiations. Hendrickson has already gone public with his frustrations, going as far as to threaten a holdout. A source described the defensive star as “extremely dug in,” and while in-season holdouts are becoming increasingly rare under the current CBA, it sounds like Hendrickson could be one of the few players to follow through with their threat.

After pacing the NFL in sacks in 2024, Hendrickson is naturally looking to join the top of the market among edge rushers. As ESPN notes, a pair of offseason deals exacerbated the situation: Myles Garrett‘s record-breaking deal with the Browns and Danielle Hunter‘s $35MM-plus annual earnings from his new deal in Houston. That latter contract is especially notable since Hunter and Hendrickson are both 30, and it could perhaps serve as a benchmark on a Bengals deal.

The $34MM threshold is notable among edge rushers, with Maxx Crosby and Nick Bosa joining Garrett and Hunter in that exclusive club. While the Bengals may be willing to temporarily pay that type of AAV, term is the likely sticking point between the two sides, as ESPN notes that Hendrickson will surely be seeking some long-term security.

“I still think they can come to a compromise, getting him above that $30-million threshold while covering themselves,” an NFC executive told ESPN. “The age [30] is something that must be a factor for them.”

So, as the two sides continue without a resolution, Hendrickson will likely stay away from voluntary OTAs. When it’s time for the pass rusher to show up, it’s uncertain if he’ll engage in a hold-in or a literal holdout. Per ESPN, the veteran has already been warned that he’ll face fines for any unexcused absences. In other words, this situation could get even more contentious as we get closer to training camp.

PFR’s latest poll produced quite the split, with at least 30% of readers viewing three of the Trey Hendrickson options as likely. Hendrickson’s comments Tuesday point to the NFL’s reigning sack champion aiming to avoid one of those paths.

Hendrickson made it clear today (via The Athletic’s Paul Dehner Jr.) he will not play on his current contract in 2025. The ninth-year defensive end is due a $15.8MM base salary. The edge rusher market has climbed considerably this offseason, and Hendrickson’s deal was out of step with his production before the Maxx Crosby and Myles Garrett extensions came to pass. This has created another Bengals standoff.

[RELATED: Hendrickson Holdout Squarely On Radar]

The Bengals have burnished their reputation as a stubborn organization in recent years. They did not pay Jessie Bates at the 2022 franchise tag deadline, and they swatted away trade requests from Hendrickson and Tee Higgins last year. That came after the organization did the same following Jonah Williams‘ trade ask in 2023. Germaine Pratt has since requested a trade. Ja’Marr Chase held in last year, as a handful of his receiver draft classmates received extensions while he waited.

That said, the Bengals appeared to make a substantial effort to appease Joe Burrow this offseason by extending Higgins along with Chase. Those deals, though, have complicated Hendrickson’s path back to Cincinnati. Following back-to-back 17.5-sack seasons, Hendrickson remains tied to the one-year, $21MM extension he signed in 2023. The former Saints draftee also has indicated this Bengals standoff has become “personal.”

Specifically, Hendrickson said Zac Taylor texted him to point out he would be fined by not reporting to the team’s June minicamp. This notification did not go over well with the disgruntled player, who described his lashing out at the Bengals today as “provoked.”

“A little bit transpired between me and Zac,” he said (via Dehner). “We’ve tried to keep it as least amount as personal as possible, but at some point in this process, it’s become personal. Being sent 30 days before mandatory camp, or how many ever days it is, that if I don’t show up, I will be fined, alludes to the fact that something won’t get done in that timeframe.

“With the lack of communication post-draft made it imminently clear to my party — meaning my wife, my son and my agent, a small group of people — that I had (to) inform that this might not work out. I don’t think it was necessary. I think we should have all hoped for the best until proven otherwise.”

The Bengals did give Hendrickson an extension, but that came via a one-year bump. In a rather interesting statement, Hendrickson said (via the Cincinnati Enquirer’s Kelsey Conway) he only signed that deal due to fear Cincinnati would use its franchise tag on him in 2025.

As it turned out, the Higgins standoff from 2024 bled into this offseason, and Hendrickson would have hit free agency at 30 had he not signed that Bengals extension. Burrow’s push for the team to retain Higgins this offseason effectively dropped Hendrickson in the team’s priority queue, but thanks to that extension, he is tied to the team for one more year. Considering Hendrickson’s age (31 in December), that extension has hurt him in an effort to capitalize on his recent production.

Hendrickson referred to the situation having become personal in recent weeks when asked if he wanted to remain a Bengal. No extension talks have transpired recently, refuting a post-draft report that indicated otherwise. The team has rejected multiple trade offers, after letting Hendrickson attempt to find a trade partner, but other teams had viewed Cincinnati’s asking price — reportedly more than a first-rounder — as unrealistic. An acquiring team would both need to surrender a high-end trade package and authorize an extension that would come in north of $30MM per year. With Crosby now at $35.5MM AAV, Hendrickson would have a case to push for that number. Deals for T.J. Watt, Micah Parsons and Aidan Hutchinson stand to further shift the top of the market.

“I’m not going to apologize for the rates of the defensive ends being paid in the National Football League,” Hendrickson said, discussing the Bengals’ lack of an offer in the ballpark the NFL’s top edge defenders have established. Thanks to the Vikings’ one-year add-on for Andrew Van Ginkel, Hendrickson is now the NFL’s 11th-highest-paid EDGE.

While Watt, Parsons and Hutchinson paydays could give Hendrickson more ammo, the Bengals’ past also indicates they are comfortable holding players to contracts. The team would appear ready to bet Hendrickson would not pass on near-$1MM game checks during his crusade. Though, Hendrickson appears ready to display resolve on this front come training camp.

While the four-time Pro Bowler stopped short of indicating he was completely done with the Bengals, this relationship has clearly soured in Year 5. The Bengals added Shemar Stewart in the first round as well.

“I think every relationship is repairable, right?” he said, via Dehner. “Like, I think Myles Garrett proved that he’s a great man, and he’s done great things for his family, and obviously providing on and off the football field. But I think that relationship will repair with time. And same with this. This is just the uncomfortable business side that we’ve unfortunately had to deal with for the last couple years, and, quite frankly, I think we’re all spent.”

It took a market-resetting offer for the Browns to bring Garrett back into the fold. An extension surely would solve the Hendrickson problem, but with the team changing course and paying Higgins, it is far from certain the accomplished defensive end will see another Cincy payday.

Not seeing big money this year also could hurt Hendrickson long term, as he will be slightly less valuable at 31 next year. That has undoubtedly spurred his crusade this offseason, and the effort shows no signs of slowing down.

MAY 13: Hendrickson is not taking part in Tuesday’s Bengals practice, but Paul Dehner Jr. of The Athletic notes he is in attendance. Hendrickson is expected to speak to the media later today, so he could provide further insight shortly into his situation.

MAY 12: No resolution is in sight in the case of Trey Hendrickson. The All-Pro edge rusher’s latest remarks make it clear the Bengals are not actively speaking about an extension with his representatives.

“No communication has taken place between my camp and the organization post draft,” a statement Hendrickson provided to ESPN’s Adam Schefter reads. “The [extension] offers prior to the draft did not reflect the vision we shared and [which] were promised last offseason if I continued to play at a high level. Coaches are aware of these past conversations.

“Rather than using collaboration to get us to a point to bring me home to the team, THEY are no longer communicating. I have been eagerly awaiting a resolution of this situation, but that’s hard to do when there is no discussion and an evident lack of interest in reaching mutual goals.”

Throughout the offseason, questions have loomed about whether or not the Bengals would be able to extend wideouts Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins while also working out a new deal with Hendrickson. Chase and Higgins are on the books for the foreseeable future, and Cincinnati’s intention leading up to the draft remained an agreement with Hendrickson. Multiple trade offers were rejected, an indication the team was still pursuing a long-term accord.

Team and player previously worked out a stop-gap deal in preparation for a lucrative extension, something Hendrickson sought last year. He did not engage in a holdout in response to Cincinnati declining to meet that request, a move which saw him duplicate 2023’s sack total (17.5). That figure led the NFL and yielded Hendrickson a fourth straight Pro Bowl nod. He is in line for a pact bringing with it a significant raise, and the top of the EDGE market now sits at $40MM per year.

Given his age, Hendrickson may not reach the top of his position’s financial pecking order, but a major accord would bring with it major Bengals cap implications. The FAU product has previously gone public with his displeasure over his situation and a lack of communication with the team. Given these latest comments, that problem apparently persists.

Opinions are split amongst PFR’s readers with respect to what will happen in this case. Hendrickson remains a candidate to be traded, extended or depart on the open market next spring. As things stand, a Cincinnati pact beyond 2025 would require considerable progress in negotiations.