Redskins Re-Sign Chris Baker
The Redskins have re-signed defensive lineman Chris Baker, the team announced today (Twitter link). Baker was set to be an unrestricted free agent for the first time this offseason after playing on his one-year restricted tender of $1.323MM in 2013. His new deal is a three-year pact worth $12MM overall, with $4MM of that amount guaranteed, reports Mike Jones of the Washington Post (via Twitter).
In his second year with the Redskins, Baker earned three starts at the end of the regular season, recording a career-high seven tackles in the team’s Week 17 game against the Giants. The 26-year-old lineman, who saw 418 snaps in 2013, could earn a larger role in 2014, depending on what other additions and subtractions the team makes on defense.
Redskins defensive coordinator Jim Haslett mentioned Baker along with DeAngelo Hall, Brian Orakpo, and Perry Riley last month when asked about which defensive free agents the club hoped to retain. With Hall and Baker now back in the fold, the team figures to focus on its two free agent linebackers, in an attempt to keep them off the open market.
Giants Approach Snee, Baas About Pay Cuts
The Giants have approached guard Chris Snee and center David Baas about taking pay cuts, a source tells Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk. New York is interested in keeping both players for the 2014 season, but the combined cap numbers for the duo total nearly $20MM, which is untenable for the club.
As we passed along yesterday, Snee has decided not to retire, and hopes to play at least one more season for the Giants, the team with which he has spent his entire career. The longtime right guard, who is coming off hip and elbow surgery, expressed an openness to discussing a pay cut, which would reduce his $6.75MM base salary. Taking into account bonus money, Snee’s cap number for 2014 currently sits at $11.3MM, meaning the team could clear nearly $7MM by releasing him. As such, working out a new agreement is likely in the best interests of both sides.
Baas’ case isn’t as clear, however. The Giants center, who also missed most of the 2013 season with knee issues, still has two years remaining on his contract, so cutting him this season would accelerate additional money onto the team’s 2014 cap. New York could create a little cap flexibility by cutting Baas and his $8.225MM cap number, but $6.45MM in dead money would remain on the ’14 cap, so the savings would be minimal. We’ll have to see if Baas is interested in remaining in New York and willing to reduce a 2014 base salary of $4.75MM.
Lions Re-Sign Don Muhlbach
The Lions have re-signed long snapper Don Muhlbach to a one-year contract, according to Tim Twentyman of DetroitLions.com (via Twitter). It’s a minimum salary contract that includes a $65K signing bonus, tweets Dave Birkett of the Detroit Free Press. That means Muhlbach will earn $1.02MM, though his cap hit will only be $635K.
Muhlbach, 32, has been with the Lions since the team signed him as an undrafted free agent in 2004, playing nearly every game for the team since 2005 and even earning a Pro Bowl berth as a special teams player a year ago. According to Twentyman, special teams coordinator John Bonamego refers to the veteran long snapper as a “calming influence” on young players like punter Sam Martin.
Santonio Holmes Cut Expected Soon
The Jets are expected to cut Santonio Holmes “any day now,” a league source tells Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk. We’ve expected for some time that Holmes would be released this offseason, and now it seems that could happen in advance of free agency, allowing the veteran receiver to get a headstart on the process.
Holmes, 29, has played in just 15 games for the Jets over the last two seasons due to foot issues, and even when he’s played, his production has been down. He has compiled 43 catches, 728 yards, and two TDs overall in the last two seasons.
In an effort to provide weapons for Geno Smith or the veteran signal-caller the team brings in to compete for the QB job, New York is in the market for receiving help this offseason, and cutting Holmes will create some cap space to pursue free agents. By releasing Holmes before his $1MM roster bonus is due on March 13, the club can reduce his $10.75MM cap hit to just $2.5MM in dead money, creating more than $8MM in cap savings. A report earlier this month indicated that Emmanuel Sanders and Jeremy Maclin are among the receivers who could interest the Jets, assuming they reach free agency.
As for Holmes, Florio identifies the Rams, Cardinals, and Steelers as potential suitors once he’s officially released. However, Florio’s suggestions appear to be speculation based primarily on coaching staffs rather than any concrete interest expressed by those clubs.
Bears Re-Sign Roberto Garza
11:29am: Garza’s contract includes a $100K signing bonus and $75K workout bonus, tweets Jeff Dickerson of ESPNChicago.com.
11:14am: Garza’s new one-year deal will be worth $1.5MM, according to ESPN.com’s Michael C. Wright (via Twitter).
11:03am: The Bears have locked up center Roberto Garza before he hits free agency, according to Brad Biggs of the Chicago Tribune. Biggs reports (via Twitter) that the team has re-signed Garza to a one-year contract.
Garza, who will turn 35 next month, has started all but two of Chicago’s contests over the last eight seasons, having transitioned from guard to center in 2011. The longtime Bear continued to perform at an above-average level in 2013, ranking 12th overall among 35 qualified centers, including sixth as a pass-blocker, according to Pro Football Focus’ metrics (subscription required).
When I examined the free agent market for centers this week, I ranked Garza near the top of the second tier of available options, writing that his age would likely prevent him from getting more than a short-term deal. It’s not clear how much longer Garza plans to play, but head coach Marc Trestman suggested last week that the former fourth-round pick should finish his career as a Bear. I imagine if Garza continues to play well in 2014 and wants to play another season, the team will be very open to re-signing him again a year from now.
Financial details for the one-year agreement aren’t yet known.
NFC Notes: Wharton, Panthers, Lions, Saints
The Panthers have already lost one starting lineman to retirement this week, when longtime left tackle Jordan Gross called it a career. Now, left guard Travelle Wharton tells Joseph Person of the Charlotte Observer that he’s not 100% sure about his future either. However, it sounds like if he keeps playing, the free agent lineman wants to do so in Carolina.
“I love it here in Charlotte. This is where we want to live,” Wharton said. “If there’s going to be a next year, we have to sit down and talk about it.”
Here’s more on the Panthers and a couple other NFC teams:
- Steve Smith‘s age (35 in May) and contract ($9MM in dead money, three years remaining) make him a tricky case for the Panthers, as Jason Fitzgerald explores in his latest piece at OverTheCap.com. Fitzgerald thinks it makes sense for the two sides to continue their relationship, but makes some suggestions for how to make the veteran receiver’s contract more tenable for the club.
- When the Lions inked Matthew Stafford to his long-term contract extension last summer, the team agreed to defer the payment of $17.5MM of his $27.5MM signing bonus. That bill has come due, according to Dave Birkett of the Detroit Free Press, who says the team will pay Stafford the remainder of the bonus this Friday. Glover Quin, Reggie Bush, and Jason Jones will also receive deferred bonus money within the next few weeks, but the lump-sum payments won’t alter the team’s cap outlook.
- Running back Mikel Leshoure expressed a desire for a bigger role, either in Detroit or elsewhere, and it looks like he may receive that opportunity with the Lions, writes Kyle Meinke of MLive.com.
- Add linebacker and special teams player Ramon Humber to the growing list of pending Saints free agents who have had early discussions with the club about a new deal, writes Ramon Antonio Vargas of The Advocate.
Eagles To Extend Jason Kelce
THURSDAY, 8:05am: The Eagles and Kelce are in agreement on an extension, which will be a six-year deal worth $37.5MM, reports Adam Caplan of ESPN.com (via Twitter). According to Caplan, $13MM of that money will be guaranteed.
Since Kelce hadn’t been slated to hit free agency until next winter, he’s now under contract for seven years, through the 2020 season. His deal can max out at over $40MM, and makes him one of the top five highest-paid centers in the NFL.
WEDNESDAY, 4:37pm: It’s been a busy day for the Eagles, who have announced a long-term contract extension for left tackle Jason Peters and are reportedly closing in on a new deal for Riley Cooper. However, it seems the club isn’t done making moves. According to Jeff McLane of the Philadelphia Inquirer, the Eagles are expected to announce a new multiyear extension for center Jason Kelce in the near future, perhaps as soon as tomorrow.
Kelce is set to enter the final year of his rookie contract in 2014, and has developed into one of the league’s top centers since being selected in the sixth round of the 2011 draft. The 26-year-old started all 16 games for the Eagles in 2013, and his performance ranked first among 35 qualified centers, according to Pro Football Focus’ metrics (subscription required).
Contracts for centers aren’t as lucrative as those inked by left tackles, and Kelce’s new salary may also be limited by a lack of public recognition for his play — unlike Peters, he has yet to earn a spot in a Pro Bowl. Still, an annual salary of $4MM+ would make Kelce one of the top 10 highest-paid centers in the NFL, and it wouldn’t be surprising to see him receive more than that from the Eagles.
Jason La Canfora of CBSSports.com and McLane (Twitter links) both reported earlier today that Kelce would likely be the next Eagles lineman to receive a contract extension.
Contract Bonuses
When a player signs an NFL contract, the key piece of his annual salary is the P5 amount, or what we know as the base salary. That’s the amount that the player actually earns in weekly installments throughout the NFL season. However, there aren’t many deals whose entire dollar amounts consist of the base salary. Generally, NFL contracts also include various kinds of bonus money, including perhaps signing bonuses, option bonuses, roster bonuses, or workout bonuses.
For salary cap purposes, this bonus money is counted differently than a player’s base salary, and also may or may not be earned, depending on what specific kind of bonus it is. To better understand exactly how these contract bonuses work, let’s break down the various types that can be included in a player’s contract….
Signing bonus:
The most common type of bonus, it’s typically reported at the time a contract is signed. While a player who receives an $8MM signing bonus on a new four-year contract generally receives that lump-sum payment up front, that $8MM actually prorates over the course of the deal for salary cap purposes. So it would count on the cap as $2MM per year, rather than $8MM in year one.
Signing bonuses prorate for up to a maximum of five years, so for a player inking a six- or seven-year deal with a $15MM signing bonus, that amount would count for $3MM against the cap for the first five seasons of the contract.
These prorated bonuses also represent guaranteed money, whereas other types of bonuses aren’t guaranteed at the time of the signing. That can make it tricky to release a player early on in a contract that included a large signing bonus. When a team releases a player, his remaining prorated bonus money “accelerates,” meaning it applies to his cap hit in the current league year. So if that aforementioned player who signed a four-year contract with an $8MM signing bonus is released in the second year of the deal, the remaining $6MM in prorated bonus money accelerates and counts against the cap for that season.
The effect of acceleration can be alleviated slightly by designating a player as a “June 1 cut,” or actually releasing the player after June 1. This allows the team to spread the so-called dead money remaining on a player’s contract over the course of two seasons rather than having it all apply to the current league year.
Option bonus:
An option bonus functions in a similar manner as the signing bonus, but applies to a later season. When the option bonus is due, perhaps in the second or third year of a contract, the team must commit to paying the full bonus if it intends to keep the player on its roster.
Using the above example of a player who signed a four-year contract with an $8MM signing bonus, let’s say that deal also includes a $3MM option bonus in the second year. If the team keeps the player, it will be on the hook for the new $3MM bonus, which will prorate and be worth $1MM per year in the remaining three seasons. So the last three years of the contract would each now feature $3MM in total annual bonus money — the initial $2MM per year due to the signing bonus, plus the new $1MM due to the option bonus.
Like the signing bonus, the option bonus represents guaranteed money once it’s picked up, so contracts that include both forms of bonuses become even trickier to release due to the increase in dead money.
Roster bonus:
Roster bonuses act as a sort of pay-as-you-go charge for teams. They’re not initially guaranteed, but must be paid at certain dates if the club intends to keep the player on its roster.
In many cases, a roster bonus is a lump sum due shortly after the new league year begins. For instance, Jets quarterback Mark Sanchez has a $2MM roster bonus owed to him next month if the team doesn’t release him by March 25. This form of bonus is fairly player-friendly, since even if the team doesn’t intend to pay it (like the Jets with Sanchez), it means the player will be released early in the league year, giving him plenty of time to catch on with a new team.
Another form of roster bonus is the per-game variety, which is more club-friendly. In that case, a player typically earns a portion of his roster bonus each time he remains on the team’s 53-man roster for a regular season game.
Roster bonuses contribute to a player’s salary, but unlike signing or option bonuses, the roster bonuses still remaining on a player’s deal when he’s released don’t need to be paid. So if and when the Jets release Sanchez, the team will be off the hook not only for his $2MM 2014 roster bonus, but also the $1MM roster bonuses he’s owed in 2015 and 2016.
Workout bonus:
Teams can’t force player to participate in their offseason workout program, so clubs will often include workout bonuses in contracts to encourage players to show up for those offseason workouts.
If a player has a 2014 workout bonus worth $100K, he earns that money by participating in the team’s offseason workout program, and that amount remains on his cap number for the season. However, if he chooses to forgo the workout program, he simply doesn’t earn that $100K, which is removed from his ’14 cap hit.
If a deal includes workout bonuses, they’re typically worth the same amount every year. So a player who forgos a $100K workout bonus this season could still be eligible for a workout bonus worth the same amount in 2015. As is the case with roster bonuses, teams aren’t on the hook for future workout bonuses if the player is released.
Bonus incentives:
While they’re less widely reported, bonus incentives can also be included in a player’s contract, allowing the player to earn additional salary if he meets certain criteria. These incentives are considered either “likely to be earned” or “unlikely to be earned,” depending on whether the player met the criteria the year before.
Because the designation of an incentive relies on the previous year’s performance, the likely/unlikely binary doesn’t always make sense. For instance, an incentive for a Pro Bowl berth could be considered likely to be earned if the player was in the Pro Bowl the year before. However, if a wide receiver missed a season due to injury, including an incentive for catching 20 balls the following season would be considered unlikely to be earned, since he didn’t reach 20 catches the previous season.
At the start of the league year, incentive bonus money counts against the cap as long as it’s likely to be earned. At the end of the year, a player’s cap number is adjusted to reflect which bonuses he earned and which ones he didn’t.
While differentiating these bonuses can be tricky at first, the best way to understand the differences between them is to study contracts that include several different forms of bonuses. For our purposes, let’s pretend a 2014 free agent signs a six-year contract worth an overall amount of $55MM. The breakdown is as follows:
The player’s annual base salary starts at $3MM and increases by $1MM each year. The deal includes a $10MM signing bonus, as well as a $5MM option bonus due in 2015. There’s also a $2MM roster bonus due on the fifth day of the 2016 league year, with $1MM roster bonuses due at the same time in 2017 and 2018. Throw in annual workout bonuses worth $500K and here’s what the contract would look like (click to enlarge):
Because this player’s cap number doesn’t rise to eight figures until 2016, his $10MM guaranteed signing bonus ensures that the team wouldn’t create any cap savings by releasing him until at least the third year of the deal, even if none of his base salary is guaranteed. Even in ’16, the savings would be extremely limited — $6MM in signing bonus money and $4MM in option bonus money would accelerate, creating $10MM in dead money. In fact, assuming the option bonus is in fact exercised in 2015, those two prorated bonuses ensure there’s a significant amount of dead money in this hypothetical deal up until 2018, at which point the team would be on the hook for just $4MM if the player was released.
This is an example of a player-friendly contract, and it shows why a team may be reluctant to rely too heavily on signing or option bonuses, which limit the club’s cap flexibility. A more team-friendly contract may exclude those bonuses in favor of roster and workout bonuses, which don’t have to be paid unless the player remains on the roster.
For more information on how teams can create cap space by turning base salary into bonus money, check out our earlier piece on restructuring contracts.
Note: This is a PFR Glossary entry. Our glossary posts will explain specific rules relating to free agency, trades, or other aspects of the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement. Information from Over the Cap was used in the creation of this post.
AFC Notes: Browns, Raiders, Jackson, Ravens
Appearing on the Dan Patrick Show on Wednesday, NFL Media’s Daniel Jeremiah said that he’s hearing “from several different places” that the Browns are targeting quarterback Derek Carr with the No. 26 pick rather than drafting a signal-caller at No. 4 (link via Marc Sessler of NFL.com). Of course, there’s plenty of time for that stance to change over the next two and a half months. More out of the AFC..
- Raiders owner Mark Davis spoke to Vic Tafur of the San Francisco Chronicle about the need for a franchise quarterback, the team’s boatload of cap space, and whether or not this is a make-or-break year in Oakland.
- Mike Wilkening of Pro Football Talk expects the Broncos and Titans to be in the mix for linebacker D’Qwell Jackson, who hit the free agent market today when he was cut by the Browns. Seven teams have reached out to Jackson since his release and he’s currently deciding where to visit first, tweets Jason La Canfora of NFL.com.
- Torrey Smith is very open to the idea of the Ravens adding a receiver in free agency or the draft, as he tells Jeff Zrebiec of the Baltimore Sun. “The more, the merrier,” Smith said. “The more help you can have no matter what position it is, it’s only going to make us stronger as a unit. Whatever we bring in, whether it’s free agency or a rookie, we’ll welcome him in with open arms.”
- Although Mike Chappell of the Indianapolis Star suggested yesterday that Adam Vinatieri could be a franchise tag option for the Colts, that’s not the case, according to Joel Corry of CBSSports.com (via Twitter). As Corry notes, even though Vinatieri didn’t play out two seasons as the Patriots‘ franchise player, he was tagged twice by New England, meaning he’d be eligible for the quarterback’s franchise salary if he were tagged a third time.
Packers Re-Sign Chris Banjo
The Packers have re-signed exclusive rights free agent Chris Banjo to a one-year contract, according to Pete Dougherty of the Green Bay Press-Gazette (Twitter link). Terms of the deal aren’t known, but it’s almost certainly worth $495K, the minimum salary for a player with one year of NFL experience.
Banjo, a safety, went undrafted in 2012, then signed with the Jaguars in the summer of 2013. After he was cut by Jacksonville, the former Southern Methodist standout inked a deal with the Packers and earned a spot on the team’s regular season roster. Banjo saw some action in the secondary for Green Bay in his rookie season, playing 192 overall snaps, and will likely have to compete for a roster spot and playing time again in 2014.

