PFR Originals News & Rumors

Extension Candidate: Jordy Nelson

Few teams consistently reward high-level play from homegrown talent like the Green Bay Packers. Draft picks that come in and play well usually earn a second contract and play out their primes in Titletown. And, by not waiting until the player’s contract expires, the team can avoid a bidding war with 31 other teams and negotiate exclusively with its talent. Jordy Nelson

This was the scenario for wide receiver Jordy Nelson early in the 2011 season. A second-round pick in 2008, the Kansas State product totaled modest numbers in his first three years — 100 catches, 1286 yards, six touchdowns — before exploding for career highs (68-1,263-15) in the Packers’ 15-1 season. Green Bay signed Nelson to an incredibly team-friendly three-year, $13.35MM extension after four games, locking him up through the 2014 season.

Nelson fought through injuries in 2012, playing in 12 games and catching just 49 balls. But, proving he doesn’t need an elite quarterback to put up elite numbers, Nelson set career bests in receptions (85) and yards (1,314) in 2013, catching passes from Aaron Rodgers, Seneca Wallace, Scott Tolzien and Matt Flynn.

Now, with just one year left on his deal, Nelson is one of the Packers’ prime candidates for a contract extension. Right behind him — or along side — is fellow wideout Randall Cobb, who is still on his rookie contract, but we’ll get to him later.

In February, NFL.com’s Ian Rapoport was told that signing Nelson to an extension is an important offseason task for the team.

In March, ESPN’s Rob Demovsky reported that the team’s salary cap is in excellent standing, with plenty of room to extend Nelson and Cobb if and when they choose to do so.

Today, answering tweets from his readers, Demovsky said it would be a surprise if at least one of the two free-agents-to-be didn’t receive his extension before September. He also suggests that Cobb is a more vital re-sign, given his youth and a “budding star” status.

In a Facebook poll, the Green Bay Press-Gazette’s Wes Hodkiewicz asked readers which receiver they’d choose to extend. 69 voted Nelson, 41 voted Cobb and 31 couldn’t get off the fence, voting for both.

Nelson’s not exactly old — he’ll turn 29 in a week — but the Packers have recently shown a willingness to walk away from wide receivers who might have seen their best years in the rear view. Case in point, Greg Jennings, whom the Packers let walk after seven incredibly productive seasons. Jennings got his payday in Minnesota, signing a five-year deal with a maximum value of $47.5MM ($18MM guaranteed).

After next season, Nelson will have been in Green Bay seven years, just like Jennings. Both are former second-round picks who were locked up to team-friendly deals in the midst of their rookie contracts.

According to Bob McGinn of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the Packers offered Jennings a contract averaging $8MM to stay in Green Bay once the free agency period started. Jennings chose Minnesota. During the season, with Jennings at his peak, the team reportedly offered $11MM/season, which Jennings turned down, far less than the $15 million AAV he was after.

Just last week, another division rival has helped set the market for receivers, with Chicago’s Brandon Marshall signing a four-year, $40MM extension with $22.5MM guaranteed. Will Nelson’s agent use Marshall’s extension to negotiate his client’s new deal? Will the Packers go the same route with Nelson they did with Jennings if the asking price is too high? Only time will tell, but all of Titletown — and especially its quarterback — will be watching.

 

Checking In On Draft Pick Signings

Under old NFL Collective Bargaining Agreements, the time between the draft and the regular season represented a period of uncertainty for many rookies, with no assurances that contracts would get signed before training camps opened in the summer. However, the current CBA has expedited the process significantly, essentially locking in signing bonus and contract values by draft slot, meaning that deals are being completed faster than ever and holdouts are becoming a thing of the past.

With the help of our list of draft pick signings by team, here are a few details on which contracts have been finalized so far, and which ones still need to be signed:

  • 139 draftees have signed, or at least agreed to terms, so far. Since 256 players were drafted in total, that leaves 117 who still have to sign.
  • Although more than half of this year’s draft picks have been locked up, that ratio doesn’t extend to first-rounders. Only six of those 32 players have reached agreements with their respective clubs so far — Khalil Mack (No. 5), Anthony Barr (No. 9), Odell Beckham Jr. (No. 12), Kyle Fuller (No. 14), Brandin Cooks (No. 20), and Teddy Bridgewater (No. 32). There shouldn’t be any problems with the contracts for any first-round picks, but there are a few more details to negotiate for those players, including overall guaranteed money.
  • Conversely, the deals for seventh-rounders are less complicated to work out, so it’s not surprising that 33 of 41 seventh-round picks have agreed to terms on their deals. Four of those eight unsigned seventh-rounders were drafted by the Rams, who have yet to sign any of their picks.
  • The Saints and Bears made quick work of the draft pick signing period, having signed all of their 2014 draftees to rookie contracts already. The Chargers, Colts, and Giants each have just one player left to lock up.
  • On the other hand, several clubs are taking their time to sign their draft picks, or at least are in no rush to announce those deals — in addition to the Rams, the Broncos, Bengals, Dolphins, and Browns have yet to ink any rookie contracts.
  • To check out the pick-by-pick breakdown of signing bonuses and contract values for each draft slot, be sure to visit OverTheCap.com.

Extension Candidate: Patrick Peterson

Free agent cornerbacks made out awfully well for themselves back in March, with Aqib Talib securing the largest overall contract of the offseason ($57MM), while Darrelle Revis landed the biggest annual value (technically $16MM per year; realistically $12MM per year). However, as our list of the largest free agent contracts of the year shows, neither of those deals ranked among the contracts with the most guaranteed money. Vontae Davis of the Colts barely made his way onto that list, but for the most part, several other positions ranked ahead of corners when it came to overall guarantees.Patrick Peterson

That hasn’t been the case so far during contract extension season though. Two of the league’s most talented cornerbacks, Richard Sherman of the Seahawks and the Browns’ Joe Haden, have inked new long-term deals over the last several weeks, and both players raised the bar for the sort of paydays that the NFL’s elite corners should expect. Sherman’s four-year extension averaged $14MM annually, significantly exceeding the numbers achieved by Revis, Talib, and this year’s other free agent corners. Haden’s five-year deal, meanwhile, reportedly includes $22MM in fully guaranteed money, which would have ranked first on our list of overall guarantees for 2014 free agent contracts, topping Branden Albert‘s $20MM.

Players around the league are undoubtedly taking notice of contracts like Sherman’s and Haden’s, and few players are watching more closely than Patrick Peterson of the Cardinals, who may be the next cornerback in line for a lucrative multiyear extension. Shortly after word of Haden’s new deal broke, Peterson tweeted, “45!!!!!” — a reference to the total guarantee in Haden’s contract, which also is said to feature $23MM guaranteed for injury only.

The Cardinals and Peterson’s reps have engaged in extension talks this offseason, and the All-Pro expressed optimism that he’ll remain in Arizona “for a while.” But his case is a little different than Sherman’s and Haden’s. Both of those players had just one year remaining on their previous contracts, which added a little urgency to negotiations for their respective teams, who didn’t want to see their stars reach free agency. After having his fifth-year option exercised recently, Peterson is under contract for two more years, through the 2015 season.

Still, even if there’s not necessarily a rush to get something done before the 2014 season, the two sides appear committed to trying to reach a common ground. If the team and player want to resolve the long-term contract situation sooner rather than later, tacking a few years onto Peterson’s current contract at some point this summer seems likely.

So what sort of money would Peterson be looking at on a new deal? Sherman and Haden provide two easy points of comparison. Although Peterson is the youngest of the trio, the fact that he’s under contract for two years means that Arizona would be locking him up for a similar portion of his career. Sherman’s four new years span his age 27 to age 30 seasons, while Haden’s five new years lock him up from age 26 through 30. A new contract for Peterson would begin in 2016, his age 26 season.

Of course, the fact that Peterson is still just 23 years old (24 in July) should play some part in negotiations. It’s fair to assume that the young star still has some room for improvement, and if Peterson believes he can take another step forward during the 2014 season, he may be inclined to wait another year to sign a deal, when his value is even higher and the Cardinals feel a little more pressure to get something done.

More important than Peterson’s age is his performance, and it’s hard to argue he’s not in the same class as Sherman and Haden. Pro Football Focus’ advanced metrics (subscription required) ranked the former fifth overall pick among the top 20 cornerbacks in the league in each of the last two seasons, and he was a takeaway machine in those two years, snagging 10 interceptions and recovering seven fumbles.

The fact that Peterson ranked 102nd out of 109 corners during his rookie season, according to PFF’s grades, is a knock against him, particularly when compared to Haden, who has never ranked outside the top 20 at his position. The Cardinals’ standout has also never ranked higher than 16th on PFF, whereas Sherman has been in the top six each of the last two seasons. But Peterson makes up for that somewhat with his knack for big plays and his ability to return punts. Although his role on special teams was reduced somewhat in 2013, Peterson returned four punts for touchdowns in his rookie year, and that capacity for providing a game-changing play when he’s not even on defense increases his overall value as a player.

Peterson will likely be pushing to exceed the $14MM annual salary Sherman got on his four-year extension and the $22MM in fully guaranteed money that Haden received on his five new years. I’m skeptical that he tops both figures, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he at least matches one or both. If Peterson and the Cardinals were open to something similar to the five years and $68MM that Haden got from the Browns, that would bring Peterson’s seven-year total to nearly $81MM, exceeding Haden’s overall value.

Perhaps the Cardinals, with a roster closer to contention and a winter climate that’s more appealing than Cleveland’s, wouldn’t have to pay quite the same premium to keep their own star cornerback off the free agent market. But based on Peterson’s Twitter reaction to Haden’s extension, it’s clear he’s keeping a close eye on what his fellow corners are earning, meaning it’s unlikely he takes a real discount. If the Cardinals are willing to pony up with two years still remaining on Peterson’s deal, it may just be a matter of time until we see our third huge cornerback extension of the spring.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

PFR Originals: 5/11/14 – 5/18/14

Here’s the original content produced by the PFR staff during the past week:

  • Luke Adams examined the most balanced and the most unbalanced drafts of 2014; the Buccaneers, for example, used their selections exclusively on offensive players, while the Falcons focused primarily on supplementing their defense.
  • Follow which team is making the most progress in getting its 2014 picks under contract with the PFR Draft Pick Signing Tracker.
  • All of the undrafted free agent news is now located in one place, so you can observe whom your favorite team added after the draft concluded.

Recap Of Undrafted Free Agent Signings

Since the draft came to an end on Saturday evening, we’ve been keeping tabs on undrafted rookies signing with NFL teams, passing along the moves that have been confirmed by either a club or the league itself. Over the course of the week, all 32 clubs have made their UDFA signings official, and we’ve rounded up those announcements below, sorted by team.

In some cases, teams have added one or two extra rookie free agents to their group after announcing their initial class, so we’ve tried to keep those moves contained to the same post in which we initially passed along the team’s UDFA class, wherever possible.

Check out the list below to find your favorite team’s undrafted free agent signings:

AFC East

AFC North

AFC South

AFC West

NFC East

NFC North

NFC South

NFC West

2014’s Most Balanced And Unbalanced Drafts

Teams entered last week’s NFL draft with many different positions and areas they planned to focus on, but depending on how the draft played out, many clubs didn’t end up addressing all their needs. For instance, few would have guessed heading into the draft that neither the Panthers nor the Ravens would come out of the weekend having added an offensive tackle.

Whether intentional or not, a handful of teams ended up specifically focusing on one area of the ball in the draft, selecting far more offensive players than defensive players, or vice versa. Listed below are the teams who had the most offensive-heavy drafts, teams who had defensive-heavy drafts, and the clubs who managed to perfectly balance their picks. Let’s check out the lists….

Most offensive-heavy drafts:

  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers (6 offense, 0 defense): After spending big to add defensive end Michael Johnson and cornerback Alterraun Verner in free agency, the Buccaneers were the only NFL team not to draft at least one defensive player. Instead, the club focused on adding weapons for new quarterback Josh McCown, including wide receiver Mike Evans and tight end Austin Seferian-Jenkins.
  • Jacksonville Jaguars (6 offense, 3 defense): It wasn’t until they drafted their fifth player, in the fourth round, that the Jaguars eventually selected a defensive player, having focused early on landing a quarterback (Blake Bortles) and pass-catchers (Marqise Lee, Allen Robinson).
  • New England Patriots (6 offense, 3 defense): After nabbing defensive tackle Dominique Easley in round one, the Patriots turned to offensive players for their next five picks, including second-rounder Jimmy Garoppolo.
  • Washington Redskins (5 offense, 2 defense): The Redskins picked a couple defenders in the first four rounds, grabbing linebacker Trent Murphy and cornerback Bashaud Breeland, but they tipped the scales by leaning heavily toward offensive players with their late-round picks.

Most balanced drafts:

  • New York Jets (6 offense, 6 defense)
  • Cincinnati Bengals (4 offense, 4 defense)
  • Carolina Panthers (3 offense, 3 defense)
  • Cleveland Browns (3 offense, 3 defense)
  • Denver Broncos (3 offense, 3 defense)
  • San Diego Chargers (3 offense, 3 defense)
  • Tennessee Titans (3 offense, 3 defense)

Most defensive-heavy drafts:

  • Atlanta Falcons (7 defense, 2 offense): Offensive and defensive lines were viewed as two of the top priorities for the Falcons, but after addressing those positions in the first two rounds, Atlanta went on a linebacker frenzy in the mid-to-late rounds, snatching up four of them.
  • Dallas Cowboys (7 defense, 2 offense): The Cowboys reportedly had three defensive players on their wish list in the first round, but when Anthony Barr, Aaron Donald, and Ryan Shazier came off the board, the team picked offensive tackle Zack Martin instead. Dallas remedied that by making seven of its final eight picks defensive players.
  • Minnesota Vikings (7 defense, 3 offense): The Vikings made defense their focus in the mid-to-late rounds — their last five picks were defenders, including three defensive backs. Minnesota also selected a defensive player with its first pick, drafting linebacker Anthony Barr ninth overall.
  • Oakland Raiders (6 defense, 2 offense): The Raiders’ approach looked similar to the Vikings’, as Oakland grabbed a linebacker (Khalil Mack) with its top-10 pick, then used its last five picks on defenders, with a couple offensive players sandwiched in between.
  • Philadelphia Eagles (5 defense, 2 offense): Losing DeSean Jackson made wide receiver a priority for the Eagles in the draft, so the team snatched up Jordan Matthews and Josh Huff in rounds two and three. Outside of those two picks though, it was an exclusively defensive draft for Philadelphia.

Pro Football Rumors’ list of draft results by team was used in the creation of this post.

PFR Originals: 5/4/11 – 5/11/14

Here’s the original content produced by the PFR staff during the past week:

  • Our Prospect Profile series continued, as I examined former Texas A&M offensive tackle (and Falcons draft pick) Jake Matthews.
  • Zach Links rounded up the best football blogs in the latest installment of Pigskin Links.
  • In last week’s polls, Luke Adams asked which trade up in the first round was best (more than a third said the Vikings move up for Teddy Bridgwater), I pondered who was the best player available heading into Day 3 of the draft (a virtual tie between A.J. McCarron and Pierre Desir), and Rob DiRe wondered which of the late-round quarterbacks would have the most success (with McCarron taking the top spot). Thanks for voting!
  • Luke provided a breakdown of all the 2014 draft picks, both by round and by team.

Prospect Profile: Jake Matthews

If lineage is something to be desired in an NFL draft prospect, Texas A&M offensive tackle Jake Matthews has that contest won. The 22-year-old is the son of Hall of Famer Bruce Matthews, who played 19 seasons with the Oilers/Titans, the cousin of current NFL linebackers Clay and Casey Matthews, and the brother of Kevin Matthews, who has spent time with the Titans and the Redskins.NCAA Football: Southern Methodist at Texas A&M

But even without his storied family history, Matthews’ own talent and development would make him a surefire top 10 draft selection. After being named a 2009 USA Today high school All-American, Matthews entered Texas A&M, and was plugged in on the Aggies’ offensive line, where he played started 33 games over his first three seasons (mostly at right tackle). In 2013, following the departure of incumbent left tackle Luke Joeckel (the third overall pick by the Jaguars), Matthews moved to blind side and protected quarterback Johnny Manziel for all 13 games. In addition to being selected as a consensus All-American last season, Matthews was named to the All-SEC team in both 2012 and 2013.

At 6’5″, 305 pounds, the former Aggie is large enough to handle stout defensive lineman, but also has the agility to ward off quicker outside linebackers. When compared to Joeckel, Matthews grades out as slower, but he does have the advantage in power. Sound technique is the foundation of Matthews’ game, and that proficiency, combined with his size, allows him to simply maul in the run-blocking game. His physical traits aside, Matthews’ intangibles are off the charts — he was a team captain at Texas A&M, obviously has the pedigree, reportedly scored a 32 on the Wonderlic test, and scouts are said to be highly impressed with both his awareness on the field and his leadership off it. A prototypical franchise left tackle, Matthews has the ability to “walk in and play left tackle and sit there for 10, 12 years,” as one scout told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel’s Bob McGinn.

Matthews, of course, also has his detractors and his limitations. Another scout told McGinn that Matthews’ surname might be clouding evaluators’ opinions: “If his last name was something else, I don’t think he’d be picked as high.” Physically, others believe that his arm length of 33 3/8″ might be too short, limiting his extension. Like Joeckel, Matthews is sometimes accused of lacking a “killer instinct” (however, that demerit didn’t seem to hurt Joeckel’s stock). Finally, some point to his prowess as a right tackle and believe he would be a better fit on that side of the line, which would obviously degrade his value.

It is difficult to find a team that wouldn’t be interested in Matthews, as most franchises could use a left tackle of his caliber, and if not, at least an upgrade at right tackle. The Texans will probably go in another direction, and while the Rams could be interested in an offensive lineman, most reports have Greg Robinson as the higher rated player and the favorite to go second overall. The Jaguars could re-pair him with Joeckel, but the first real possibility is probably the Browns at No. 4, who would immediately install Matthews at right tackle. Within the top 10 selections, the Raiders, Falcons, Buccaneers, Bills, and Lions are all possible landing spots for Matthews. Along with Robinson and Taylor Lewan, Matthews is part of a triumvirate of offensive tackles that will all likely be top 10 picks.

Photo courtesy of USA Sports Images.

PFR Originals: 4/27/14 – 5/4/14

Here’s the original content produced by the PFR staff during the past week:

  • We continued our Prospect Profile series, as I examined Buffalo linebacker Khalil Mack (link), Rob DiRe looked at Alabama safety Ha Ha Clinton-Dix (link) and Louisville safety Calvin Pryor (link), and Rory Parks wrote up Wisconsin safety Chris Borland (link).
  • We also asked your opinion in several polls: Peter Sowards asked if the NFL should initiate a developmental league (with two-thirds responding in the affirmative), Ben Levine wondered which embattled quarterback will have the most 2014 success (most said Matt Schaub), and Luke Adams questioned what the Falcons will do in the draft (58% of respondents think Atlanta will trade up). Thanks for voting!
  • Luke delved into restricted free agency, which affects players who have accrued three NFL seasons and have an expired contract.
  • Luke also rounded up the decisions on fifth-year options, the majority of which were exercised.

Prospect Profile: Chris Borland

Although our series of prospect profiles thus far has focused primarily on players projected to go in the first round, Wisconsin linebacker Chris Borland has been receiving a good deal of attention in the press as of late, so we thought it might make sense to explore what he has to offer. Indeed, for teams that are looking for a quality Day 2 option, Borland could represent a perfect fit.NCAA Football: Northwestern at Wisconsin

Greg Gabriel of the National Football Post gives a fairly comprehensive view of Borland’s strengths and weaknesses. For instance, Borland had a very productive collegiate career, especially in 2013, when he accumulated 112 tackles, 8.5 tackles for loss, and four sacks as Wisconsin’s “Will” linebacker. Borland also excels at the mental part of the game, as he has terrific instincts and is an effective blitzer. Also, what he lacks in speed he makes up for in his ability to read routes well and in his pass drop, which allows him to be useful in zone coverage.

However, because he does have averaged timed speed, he will struggle in man coverage. Also, he is only 5’11” and has very short arms, which means he will miss some tackles. Gabriel calls Borland a “classic overachiever,” and although he lacks ideal size and speed, he is explosive in short areas and has good change-of-direction abilities, making him an effective run-stopper. Essentially, if you can live with a few missed tackles and can pair him with a speedy linebacker who can cover receivers downfield, Borland could make a good deal of sense. His intelligence will also be a tremendous asset in the middle of any team’s defense.

Arjuna Ramgopal of WEEI.com offers similar insights as Gabriel, noting that Borland has drawn favorable comparisons to long-time Dolphins stalwart Zach Thomas. He adds that Borland is effective at diagnosing plays and is a sure tackler. Combining Ramgopal’s analysis with Gabriel’s, it seems that as long as Borland can reach you with his short arms, you will probably go down.

As far as his pedigree, Borland is as good as it gets. He was 2013 Big Ten Defensive Player of the Year, 2013 Big Ten Linebacker of the Year, 2013 first-team All-American, 2013, 2012, 2011 first team All-Big Ten, and 2009 Big Ten Freshman of the Year. Because of that pedigree, his production, and his dedication, John McMullen of the Merced Sun-Star labeled Borland a “safe” pick and calls him a “can’t-miss contributor.”

His one injury concern arose in 2010, when Borland injured his left shoulder and missed all but two games. Bob McGinn of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel writes that the injury has forced one team to take Borland off its draft board entirely, as that team’s physicians believe the shoulder would require additional surgery.

That concern, of course, could drop Borland’s stock on draft day. But assuming he is physically cleared to play, the team that drafts him will get a bruising, savvy playmaker who is effective against the run, effective enough in coverage, and who plays every down with the intensity required of his position.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.