Top 3 Offseason Needs: Cleveland Browns

In advance of March 9, the start of free agency in the NFL, Pro Football Rumors will detail each team’s three most glaring roster issues. We’ll continue this year’s series with the Cleveland Browns, who finished 1-15 in 2016, narrowly avoiding a winless season.

Depth Chart (via Roster Resource)

Pending free agents:

Top 10 Cap Hits for 2017:

  1. Joe Haden, CB: $14,400,000
  2. Joe Thomas, T: $10,000,000
  3. Robert Griffin III, QB: $9,250,000
  4. Tramon Williams, CB: $7,500.000
  5. Josh McCown, QB: $5,041,668
  6. Demario Davis, LB: $4,800,000
  7. Desmond Bryant, DL: $4,000,000
  8. Gary Barnidge, TE: $3,812,500
  9. Jamar Taylor, CB: $3,275,000
  10. Danny Shelton, DT: $3,191,910

Other:

Three Needs:

1) Find a franchise quarterback: The image has reached near immortal status on the internet: a Browns fan donning a jersey listing the litany of quarterbacks that have led the club since it returned to Cleveland in 1999, beginning with Tim Couch and Ty Detmer and concluding with the likes of Johnny Manziel and Robert Griffin III. 26 signal-callers have made at least one start for the Browns during that stretch, yet Cleveland is still searching for a franchise quarterback as the calendar turns to 2017.Robert Griffin III Browns (vertical)

Upgrading under center should be a primary goal for the Browns this offseason, as their current depth chart at the position is wholly uninspiring. Griffin is signed through the 2017 campaign, and Cleveland executive Sashi Brown said last September that the club doesn’t view RGIII as simply a short-term solution. However, Griffin started only five games in 2016 while dealing with injuries, and wasn’t overly effective when he was on the field, completing less than 60% of his passes while posting a Total Quarterback Rating of just 33. The Browns could clear $7.5MM in salary cap space by releasing Griffin this offseason, and while Cleveland certainly doesn’t need any extra cap room, the team should at least approach Griffin about a paycut.

Elsewhere on the roster, veteran Josh McCown is not part of the Browns’ long-term future (and is now considering retirement), leaving 2016 third-round pick Cody Kessler as the lone remaining option of intrigue. Thrown into the fire perhaps before he was ready, Kessler performed relatively well, tossing six touchdowns against two interceptions while managing a Total QBR of nearly 50. Kessler isn’t a star, but his display of competency during his rookie season indicates that he could carve out a career as a high-end backup, and offer the upside of a poor man’s Andy Dalton.

So even with Kessler in tow, the Browns are still in the market for another quarterback, and free agency could be the first place the club turns in its hunt. While Cleveland could take a flier on a QB such as Mike Glennon, EJ Manuel, or Ryan Nassib, it’s not readily apparent than any of those options would offer a substantial improvement on the Browns’ internal choices. Washington’s Kirk Cousins, on the other hand, would represent a significant upgrade at the quarterback position, but the Redskins are extremely unlikely to let their QB hit the open market. Recent reports have indicated Washington won’t hesitate to use the franchise tag on Cousins for a second consecutive year, but if he does reach free agency, the Browns would likely be a prime contender for his services.Mitch Trubisky (Vertical)

The draft, then, offers the best chance for Cleveland to secure a long-term option at quarterback, and while draft analysts posit that no “sure-thing” signal-caller exists in the 2017 class, this year’s crop of prospects does include some first-round QB candidates. The Browns reportedly “love” UNC’s Mitch Trubisky, and having scouted him in recent weeks, could use the first overall pick on the Tarheel quarterback. If Cleveland opts to go in another direction at No. 1, the club could look at Notre Dame’s DeShone Kizer (whom Browns scout Lake Dawson has spent an “inordinate” amount of time watching) or Clemson’s Deshaun Watson with the twelfth selection.

2) Use ample cap space to retain key free agents: The Browns will head into the offseason with — by far — the most cap space in the league, with their ~$110MM in room dwarfing the second-place 49ers by more than $30MM. And Cleveland could still create more space! By releasing, for example, Robert Griffin III, Tramon Williams, Josh McCown, and Alvin Bailey, the Browns would push their allotment of cap room north of $130MM. As such, external free agents should become more of a priority for the Browns in 2017 (the club was reportedly reticent in FA negotiations last offseason), but the key focus should remain on two internal free agents: wide receiver Terrelle Pryor and linebacker Jamie Collins.Terrelle Pryor (Vertical)

Pryor, 27, was one of the more fascinating stories in the NFL last season, as he completed his conversion from quarterback to wide receiver by putting up 77 receptions for 1,007 yards and four touchdowns. Pryor has emphasized that he’d like to remain in Cleveland (and specifically, continue to play under head coach Hue Jackson), and the Browns have reportedly begun contract negotiations with its pass-catcher. However, the prospect of free agency also looms, and Pryor has indicated that a reunion is not guaranteed. “[A]t the end of the day, it’s got to come down to what my agents think is right for me,” Pryor said last month.

Given fellow free agent Alshon Jeffery‘s myriad of injury issues and recent four-gamed PED suspension, it’s entirely possible that Pryor will be the most coveted receiver available on the open market in March. Pryor and his representatives will likely look to recent contracts signed by receivers such as Allen Hurns, Emmanuel Sanders, Doug Baldwin, and Keenan Allen, and conclude that Pryor should target an annual salary in the $10-12MM range. If no deal is reached, the Browns would have the option of using the franchise tag on Pryor, locking him up to a one-year deal worth nearly $16MM.

If Cleveland is forced to employ the franchise tag on Pryor, it would lose a great deal of leverage in contract talks with fellow pending free agent Jamie Collins, whom the Browns acquired from the Patriots last year. Clearly, signing one of Pryor or Collins before the franchise tag deadline would represent an ideal solution, and afford the Browns the opportunity to use the tag on the player who remains unsigned. The franchise tag for Collins would be a bit cheaper than Pryor’s wide receiver figure, as linebackers will only earn $14.754MM under the tag.Jamie Collins

Collins remains open to staying in Cleveland if the “money is right,” but the franchise tag might be the better route for the Browns given Collins’ previously reported contract demands. Before being dealt by the Patriots, Collins apparently turned down $11MM per annum from New England, and is now aiming to top Luke Kuechly‘s $12.36MM annual salary. Guaranteed money will obviously place a large role in negotiations, but if Collins’ asking price remains excessive, the Browns should simply opt for the franchise tag route. After sacrificing either a third- or fourth-round pick for Collins, Cleveland can’t afford to let him get away via free agency.

3) Continue to stockpile draft capital: The majority of early mock drafts project the Browns to take Texas A&M pass rusher Myles Garrett with the first overall pick, and while Cleveland has reportedly placed an “astronomical grade” on the Aggie linebacker, it’s fair to wonder if the Browns should reprise their 2016 draft strategy and trade down, acquiring a bevy of extra picks in the process. In their two deals involving first-rounders last year, for example, the Browns received 175 cents and 148 cents on the dollar, respectively, a haul that Cleveland would surely be pleased to reap once again.Hue Jackson (Vertical)

Of course, the Browns are already in fine position for this year’s draft, as they hold eight picks in total, including two in each of the first two rounds. Additionally, Nick Korte of Over the Cap projects Cleveland will receive fourth- and fifth-round compensatory selections (in addition to two more comp picks that have already been traded). But given that the Browns have a claim to the worst roster in the NFL (with only the 49ers coming close in terms of a dearth of talent), the club should be trying to take as many bites at the apple as possible, rather than placing its bets on a few top picks.

If EVP of football operations Sashi Brown and chief strategy office Paul DePodesta remain the Browns’ key decision-makers, Cleveland will likely employ a similar approach to 2016, when the club ultimately acquired 14 draft picks, three more than any other team. But despite Browns owner Jimmy Haslam claiming there would be no changes to club leadership, head coach Hue Jackson is reportedly pushing for Cleveland to hire a formal general manager, and has already compiled a list of candidates for the position. From my vantage point, it’s possible that Jackson would feel more comfortable with a less analytical front office calling the shots, and if a more “old-school” GM is in fact hired, the Browns may not be so quick to trade down in the draft.

Photo courtesy of USA Today Sports Images.

View Comments (16)
newest oldest

16 comments on “Top 3 Offseason Needs: Cleveland Browns

  1. Paris

    Outside of retaining our own key free agents. The Browns need to also look at adding additional free agents that can contribute instead of just relying on the draft. I understand trying to compile picks and gain talent in that manner but it will continue to hinder the Browns growth and winning. It needs to be a blend of vets and young guys. Plus if they were to draft a QB they should get Watson.

    0
    0

    Reply Report
    • gmflores27

      Good teams rely on the draft, it won’t hinder this team

      3
      1

      Reply Report
  2. Jake

    Browns need to draft defense and OL with this draft and wait until the 2018 draft for a QB. If I were doing the draft, I’d take Allen with the #1 pick versus Garrett.

    4
    0

    Reply Report
  3. sufferfortribe
    sufferfortribe

    Garrett at #1, then use the second 1st-round pick on either a Safety or QB.
    2nd Round, get a Center and a CB.
    No more trading down.

    3
    1

    Reply Report
  4. Trade for a QB several backups available from The Pat’s and the Bengals

    0
    5

    Reply Report
  5. TJECK109

    They should target Garapolo from the Pats. They have the draft picks to make it happen.

    1
    5

    Reply Report
    • gmflores27

      No

      4
      0

      Reply Report
    • bradthebluefish
      bradthebluefish

      Yes. All depends on the price / draft picks.

      0
      0

      Reply Report
  6. Mike

    No way they should take a qb this year early. The defense is a wreck. Take Garret 1 and Jamal Adams at 12 .. re sign Collins and go after another safety in free agency. Than use the rest of picks on bpa

    5
    0

    Reply Report
  7. Wonder if the Lions shock the NFL fanbase by trading Stafford for their 2 first round picks and their 1st second rounders plus a 1st rounder next year with the Lions adding a 4th next year that can be a 3rd depending on how Stafford plays

    0
    7

    Reply Report
    • hashtag

      Stafford isn’t worth that. not even close. And the Browns would still suck even with Stafford. never gunna happen jonjon

      4
      0

      Reply Report
      • TheMichigan

        He isn’t worth 3 first round picks but he is worth quite a bit. He’s close to an elite QB for us, it’s gong to cost a bit to acquire him.

        1
        1

        Reply Report
  8. “After sacrificing either a third- or fourth-round pick for Collins, Cleveland can’t afford to let him get away via free agency.”

    Ya they can, he would net them the same pick in comp next year if he left.

    3
    0

    Reply Report
  9. Hop Sanders

    Trade down for more drafts picks…. that’s one of the most stupidest ideas I ever heard.

    0
    3

    Reply Report
  10. hill
    hill

    Top 3 Needs:

    1. Ownership and culture change
    2. An offense
    3. A defense

    Boiling it down to top 3 positions is kinda pointless at this stage of their tear down. Or is it a rebuild.
    Or is baseball boy depodesta asking them to trust a Process?

    0
    5

    Reply Report
  11. ffjsisk

    What about wr? That still a need?

    0
    0

    Reply Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

 Notify me of followup comments via e-mail.