PFR Originals News & Rumors

5 Key Stories: 3/24/19 – 3/31/19

Gronk will retire (or maybe not?): This era’s tight end kingpin will leave the game shy of his 30s. Rob Gronkowski informed the Patriots he will retire at just 29. This would make him a candidate to join Jim Brown and Gale Sayers as Hall of Famers by their mid-30s, in the event Gronk stays retired. However, the Pats icon might not be 100 percent committed to this venture just yet. At least, his agent doesn’t think so. Drew Rosenhaus’ gut feeling is his client will come back at some point, though Gronkowski informed Rosenhaus he is “done, done, done.” The Patriots placed Gronk on their reserve/retired list, ensuring they would hold his rights if he reconsiders.

Patriots DC backs out: Greg Schiano reversed course on his commitment to become the Pats’ defensive coordinator. The former Buccaneers head coach decided this week to vacate his new role, barely a month after accepting it. Schiano spent the past three seasons as an Ohio State assistant head coach. His decision has Bill Belichick rumored to be taking on more responsibilities next season. The Pats lost longtime DC Matt Patricia during last year’s hiring period and de facto DC Brian Flores is now the Dolphins’ head coach, putting the defending Super Bowl champs in a bit of a bind.

Eagles, Cowboys add veterans via trade: In an offseason that seen the Eagles bring back DeSean Jackson and Vinny Curry and sign Malik Jackson, Philadelphia made another move to bolster its 2019 roster. Jordan Howard is now an Eagle, with the Bears set to receive merely a 2020 sixth-round pick for their three-year starting running back. This adds a big name to Philly’s backfield. The Cowboys, conversely, have been quiet. But they made a deal to acquire Robert Quinn late this week. The rebuilding Dolphins shed another veteran and will pay some of his salary. The Cowboys and Quinn also agreed to a pay reduction, with the eighth-year edge defender now set to make $8MM in 2019.

Nelson, Lechler, Lang say goodbye: More Pro bowlers are leaving the game. Jordy Nelson, Shane Lechler and T.J. Lang announced their respective retirements this week. All three players were free agents. Nelson will call it quits after 11 seasons — 10 of which in Green Bay. Although Nelson was only a one-time Pro Bowler, he was one of this era’s premier scorers at the receiver position. He finished as a top-five Packer in receptions, receiving yards and touchdown grabs. Lechler did not play last season but logged 18 years as a punter, one of the best the NFL has ever seen. The former Raiders and Texans specialist finished with six first-team All-Pro nods — the most ever for a punter. A two-time Pro Bowler, Lang spent two seasons with the Lions after an eight-year Packers run. The veteran guard ran into injury trouble in Detroit, most notably dealing with concussion issues in recent years.

Trouble on the DeMarcus Lawrence front? The franchise-tagged contingent had not produced much news this offseason … until this week. It no longer appears the Cowboys’ negotiations with Lawrence are going smoothly. While that is not uncommon for players attached to a tag, Lawrence’s asking price may be an issue. Once thought to not view Lawrence as a $20MM-AAV player, the Cowboys have now seen their standout defensive end ask for more than $22MM on average. Dallas had increased its offer to Lawrence and has addressed the fact that the gulf between Khalil Mack and Von Miller ($23.5MM per year to $19MM AAV) is an issue. Now, the sides are at an impasse, with Lawrence’s shoulder surgery (which calls for around a four-month recovery) still yet to be scheduled.

PFR Originals: 3/24/19 – 3/31/19

The original content and analysis produced by the PFR staff during the past week:

Community Tailgate: How Will DeMarcus Lawrence Saga End?

We heard several days ago that negotiations between the Cowboys and franchise-tagged pass rusher DeMarcus Lawrence are at an impasse, and the circumstances behind that impasse are the stuff that offseason drama is made of.

Lawrence, who willingly played out the 2018 season under the franchise tag, does not want to go year-to-year anymore, and he has made it abundantly clear that he wants a long-term deal. The Cowboys are happy to give it to him, but they do not value Lawrence’s skill-set quite as highly as Lawrence himself does. Dallas reportedly would give Lawrence a contract that would make him the highest-paid 4-3 defensive end in football, which would mean an AAV of over $18MM, but Lawrence is seeking a pact that would pay him at least $22.5MM per year (of course, if Lawrence were to sign his franchise tender, he would earn over $20.5MM this year and be eligible for free agency again in 2020).

In fairness to the Cowboys, Lawrence is simply not worth that kind of commitment. The market for premium players in the NFL is reset each time a new extension is signed, so if Player X signs a $100MM pact in August, Player Y, who is good but perhaps not as good as Player X, could very well land a $110MM deal in September. But sometimes, the gulf between Player X and Player Y does not justify that type of raise.

Aaron Donald‘s contract with the Rams, which he signed just last August, pays him $22.5MM per year. Lawrence is not the kind of game-changing talent that Donald is, nor is he as impactful as Khalil Mack, who signed a $23.5MM/year deal right after Donald got his payday. To be sure, Lawrence is an excellent player, but he is just not on the same level.

Further complicating the issue is that Lawrence is trying to leverage the shoulder surgery that he needs in order to continue playing into the type of contract that he wants. Lawrence wants to wait to have the surgery, which carries a four-month recovery period, until he gets his extension, and the Cowboys obviously don’t want to play along with that plan. If Lawrence wants to be ready for the start of the 2019 season, he would have to go under the knife by early May at the latest, and if he postpones the procedure, he may only be hurting himself in the long run.

We would like to know from our readers how you think this saga will play out. The safe money in these types of scenarios is always on the two sides reaching an accord, but that does not always happen. Theoretically, the Cowboys could give Lawrence permission to seek a contract with another club and then trade him to that club if he reaches an agreement, but it is difficult to imagine another team being willing to meet Lawrence’s contract demands and cough up draft compensation to acquire the soon-to-be 27-year-old.

If Lawrence refuses to come to the table, the Cowboys could rescind the franchise tag, which would make Lawrence an unrestricted free agent. But at that point, the market may not be as robust as he would like it to be, especially if he has not had the surgery yet. He could end up having to settle for a one-year pact for less than he would have earned under the franchise tag.

The guess here is that Lawrence and the Cowboys agree to terms on a multiyear pact that will pay Lawrence about $19MM per season, and that the agreement will come in the next few weeks so that Lawrence will be ready to go come September. It appears that Dallas has the leverage, but the club obviously does not want to risk losing a key player while also creating animosity in the locker room and alienating future free agents.

But what do you think the team should do, and what do you think will ultimately happen? Let us know in the comments section.

Poll: Should Giants Trade For Josh Rosen?

NFL teams in need of a long-term answer at quarterback appear to have an interesting opportunity this offseason. One of 2018’s top quarterback prospects may well be available at a discount rate — both financially and in terms of draft capital — less than a year after being selected.

Nothing has cooled on the Cardinals-Kyler Murray front, leaving Josh Rosen as one of the more intriguing potential trade chips in memory. Kliff Kingsbury in February said Rosen would be the starting quarterback on his first Cardinals team, and while he has not officially changed his stance on this, the odds entering April of Rosen having a second opportunity with the Cards look longer than the likelihood of the UCLA product being traded.

The Giants loom as a possible landing spot. If/when Rosen becomes available, one of the teams that passed on him last year will be interested. Big Blue did not have a consensus on the top quarterback in last year’s draft, but with Eli Manning having recently turned 38 and Dave Gettleman having chosen Saquon Barkley over Sam Darnold 11 months ago, the prospect of a first-round quarterback talent being available at a lower rate has to be somewhat enticing — especially for a Giants team that has numerous needs on defense.

Gettleman traded both Jason Pierre-Paul, Olivier Vernon, Damon Harrison and Eli Apple in the past year and opted against placing the Giants’ franchise tag on Landon Collins. The team has a few surefire starters — Alec Ogletree, Jabrill Peppers, Janoris Jenkins, Dalvin Tomlinson, B.J. Hill — but is lacking talent elsewhere on its first unit. Both of the Giants’ first-round picks could go toward rebuilding their defense. They are not looking to package their Nos. 6 and 17 picks to move up, either.

None of this year’s group of passing prospects has wowed the Giants, who have been up and down on Dwayne Haskins. If Big Blue is dead-set on the Ohio State-honed quarterback, this is a fairly big secret. Gettleman, however, said his Manning successor will need to be a first-round pick. None of this year’s quarterbacks would outrank Rosen as prospects, in the eyes of multiple high-profile evaluators, either. Prior to selecting Barkley, though, the Giants may not have had Rosen as one of the top-three quarterbacks on their board last year.

The Cardinals took Rosen at No. 10 overall, giving up merely third- and fifth-round draft picks to move up five spots last year. The results were not pretty.

Rosen completed 55 percent of his passes, averaged 5.8 yards per attempt and threw 11 touchdown passes compared to 14 interceptions. He finished with a league-worst 26.1 Total QBR. Football Outsiders assessed the 6-foot-4 passer as last year’s worst full-time quarterback, with Rosen’s DVOA and DYAR figures well behind the pack. Arizona, though, employed two offensive coordinators last year and experienced rampant trouble on its offensive line, creating a shaky setup for a rookie quarterback.

It will almost certainly not cost a team a first-round pick to land Rosen this year. A second, or possibly a third, figures to be enough to pry the 2018 prospect away. The Giants hold the No. 37 overall pick but do not have another selection until No. 132; Big Blue’s third-rounder went toward 2018 supplemental draft cornerback Sam Beal. This would complicate a Giants trade for Rosen, with other teams seemingly likely to pursue the low-cost passer as well. With the Cardinals having paid his signing bonus, a team acquiring Rosen would have him for less than $7MM through the 2021 season. That is obviously great value, if a team believes the 22-year-old is a worthwhile starter.

So should the Giants be the team that pulls the trigger for Rosen, or should they focus on one of this year’s rookie QBs? After his rough debut season, do you view him as a legitimate option to be a long-term starter? Vote in PFR’s latest poll and weigh in with your thoughts in the comments section.

Should the Giants trade for Josh Rosen?
Yes 75.48% (1,822 votes)
No 24.52% (592 votes)
Total Votes: 2,414

Checking In On 2019’s Restricted Free Agents

The deadline for NFL restricted free agents to sign offer sheets with rival clubs is April 19, so RFAs have roughly three weeks to discuss deals with other teams. So far, only one RFA — running back Malcolm Brown — has inked an offer sheet, but the Rams matched the terms of the pact, meaning he’ll head back to Los Angeles.

As a reminder, RFA tenders are named based on the draft choice compensation they demand. If a team gives an offer sheet to a restricted free agent who was tendered at the second-round level, for example, and that player’s original club declines to match the contract terms, the new team must sacrifice a second-round pick in order to sign the player. The lowest tender will give the original club a draft choice equal to that which was originally used to draft the player (undrafted players tendered at the original round level, therefore, require no draft compensation).

In total, more than 30 restricted free agents have been tendered this offseason. Let’s take a look at where things stand with those RFAs:

Signed to offer sheet:

First-round tender ($4.4047MM):

  • None

Second-round tender ($3.095MM):

Original round / right of first refusal tender ($2.025MM):

Tendered, then extended:

Tendered, then signed to new deal:

PFR Originals: 3/17/19 – 3/24/19

The original content and analysis produced by the PFR staff during the past week:

Extension Candidate: Melvin Gordon

Chargers running back Melvin Gordon said at the end of January that he would wait until Le’Veon Bell signed a new contract before engaging in extension talks with the Bolts. He later walked back those comments and said he would be open to negotiating an extension with the Chargers immediately, but regardless, Bell has finally landed his much-ballyhooed deal and Gordon and LA now have another benchmark to consider in their own negotiations.

GM Tom Telesco has said that he is open to considering an extension for Gordon — who is entering the final year of his rookie deal — this offseason, per Jeff Miller of the Los Angeles Times. However, Telesco indicated he didn’t have a timetable for a new deal, and given that there have not been any public reports concerning an extension, it may not happen until the summer at this point.

Gordon’s injury history is a complicating factor, but his talent is undeniable. The 2015 first-round pick does not have eye-popping YPC numbers in his career (he has averaged 4.0 yards per carry over his four professional seasons), but he did manage 5.1 yards per tote in 2018. He is also a major weapon as a receiver, compiling over 400 receiving yards in each of the past three seasons. He has 28 rushing touchdowns and 10 receiving scores in his career, and he was a key part of the Chargers’ return to the postseason last year.

But he did miss four games down the stretch in 2018, and he had December IR trips in 2015 and 2016. He did manage a full 16-game slate in 2017, and Telesco said he does not have “too many concerns” about Gordon’s durability, though that may not be entirely true.

In any event, Gordon stands to cash in and will surely be paid at the high end of the running back market. Todd Gurley is currently the pacesetter with an average annual value of $14.375MM and $45MM in guarantees, while Bell just landed a $13.125MM/year pact. The Cardinals’ David Johnson is now working under a $13MM/year deal and stands to earn $32MM in guarantees.

Gordon is due a modest $5.61MM this year under his fifth-year option, and if he does not get the long-term deal he’s looking for, he could force the issue by holding out. But it sounds as though both sides are willing to continue their relationship for the foreseeable future, and as Miller observes, Gordon is a popular figure in the Chargers’ locker room, so team brass will want to be careful about how it handles negotiations with him.

The guess here is that Gordon gets his extension sometime before the start of the regular season and lands a four-year deal worth about $14MM per year and with $35MM or so in guarantees.

This Date In Transactions History: Charles Clay Joins The Bills

Four years ago today, Charles Clay officially went to the Bills on a five-year, $38MM deal. Has the deal been worth it?

The 2011 sixth-round pick out of Tulsa spent the first four seasons of his career in Miami. Between 2013 and 2014, Clay averaged 63.5 receptions for 682 yards and 4.5 touchdowns. The tight end then hit free agency as a transition player, and he garnered a relatively lucrative offer from Buffalo.

Then, on this date in 2015, the Dolphins decided to not match the offer, clearing the way for Clay to officially join the Bills. At the time, the pairing made sense. Then-offensive coordinator Greg Roman planned to capitalize on the tight end’s versatility, as Clay had the ability to line up in multiple formations.

The result? Well, Clay’s numbers through his first three seasons in Buffalo were about on-par with his Miami numbers. The tight end was actually remarkably consistent between 2015 and 2017, compiling at least 49 receptions and 520 receiving yards.

However, the veteran took a major step back in 2018. In 13 games, he hauled in 21 receptions for 184 yards and no touchdowns. With a year remaining on his contract, the Bills moved on from Clay back in February. The move saved Buffalo $4.5MM. Clay ended up catching on with the Cardinals on a one-year, $3.25MM deal.

Was the move ultimately worth it? The ~$7.5MM average annual value was a bit high, although when you also consider Clay’s blocking prowess, you could justify that type of money through the first three years of the deal. Getting little to zero production through the final two seasons isn’t a good look, but the Bills were partly paying for potential, anyway. The contract didn’t work out as planned, but it wasn’t a debilitating deal for the franchise.

2019 NFL Draft Capital By Team

While each NFL team is organically handed seven draft picks per season, trades involving draft choices and the compensatory pick process ensures that many clubs end up with more (or fewer) than their original seven selections. As always, you can view the complete 2019 draft order, but here we’ll look at how much draft capital each club has amassed.

Let’s take a look at how many draft picks each NFL club currently possesses:

Updated: 4-23-19 (12:57pm CT)

12 picks

  • New England Patriots
  • New York Giants

11 picks

  • Cincinnati Bengals

10 picks

  • Arizona Cardinals
  • Buffalo Bills
  • Green Bay Packers
  • Pittsburgh Steelers

9 picks

  • Atlanta Falcons
  • Detroit Lions
  • Indianapolis Colts
  • Washington Redskins

8 picks

  • Baltimore Ravens
  • Cleveland Browns
  • Denver Broncos
  • Minnesota Vikings
  • Oakland Raiders

7 picks

  • Carolina Panthers
  • Houston Texans
  • Jacksonville Jaguars
  • Kansas City Chiefs
  • Los Angeles Chargers
  • Los Angeles Rams
  • Miami Dolphins
  • Philadelphia Eagles
  • Tampa Bay Buccaneers

6 picks

  • Dallas Cowboys
  • New Orleans Saints
  • New York Jets
  • San Francisco 49ers
  • Tennessee Titans

5 picks

  • Chicago Bears
  • Seattle Seahawks

Of course, not all draft picks are created equally, as holding more early-round selections is eminently more valuable than collecting mid-to-late round picks. Using Chase Stuart of Football Perspective‘s draft value chart, we can calculate how many draft capital points each team owns heading into the 2019 NFL draft:

  1. New York Giants: 75.0
  2. Oakland Raiders: 74.1
  3. Arizona Cardinals: 66.5
  4. Green Bay Packers: 63.1
  5. San Francisco 49ers: 57.0
  6. Buffalo Bills: 53.8
  7. Jacksonville Jaguars: 52.9
  8. Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 51.8
  9. New England Patriots: 51.7
  10. Indianapolis Colts: 50.7
  11. Pittsburgh Steelers: 50.1
  12. Cincinnati Bengals: 49.0
  13. Denver Broncos: 49.0
  14. Atlanta Falcons: 48.3
  15. Detroit Lions: 47.8
  16. Carolina Panthers: 47.4
  17. New York Jets: 47.3
  18. Washington Redskins: 45.2
  19. Houston Texans: 42.6
  20. Philadelphia Eagles: 42.5
  21. Miami Dolphins: 41.9
  22. Seattle Seahawks: 40.8
  23. Tennessee Titans: 39.9
  24. Baltimore Ravens: 39.4
  25. Minnesota Vikings: 38.4
  26. Los Angeles Chargers: 34.3
  27. Los Angeles Rams: 29.9
  28. Cleveland Browns: 29.2
  29. Kansas City Chiefs: 26.6
  30. Dallas Cowboys: 23.7
  31. New Orleans Saints: 12.7
  32. Chicago Bears: 12.4

How The Saints Can Replace Max Unger

Max Unger retired Saturday in a manner befitting his wildly underrated career. He didn’t announce intentions before the 2018 season began, or post a statement on social media. Instead, Unger’s retirement simply showed up on the NFL’s transactions wire when his name was listed on the reserved/retired list. Unger, who came to New Orleans in exchange for tight end Jimmy Graham and a first-round pick in 2015, earned one first-team All-Pro berth, three Pro Bowl nods, and one Super Bowl ring during his excellent 10-year career.

But by hanging up his cleats, Unger has left the Saints in a bit of a lurch. Fully expected to compete for championships for the rest of Drew Brees‘ career, New Orleans now has a gaping hole in the middle of its offensive line. The only realistic option on the Saints’ roster to replace Unger is 2017 undrafted free agent Cameron Tom, who some observers have considered New Orleans’ center-in-waiting.

The Saints are clearly fans of Tom, as they bumped up his practice squad salary during the 2017 campaign in order to keep him from leaving for another club. After two years in the New Orleans system, Tom should be familiar with the club’s offense, but he’s started only one game for the Saints since being promoted in October 2017. Pro Football Focus assigned Tom poor marks for his 178 offensive snaps last year.

If the Saints aren’t comfortable moving forward with Tom as their starting center, they’ll have three paths available via which they could find a new pivot: the upcoming draft, a trade, or by sorting through the remaining free agents. Let’s take a look at each avenue:

Draft

After entering the 2017 draft with the fifth-most draft capital in the NFL, the Saints have since eschewed the concept of acquiring top-end, controllable assets over the past two seasons. With the now-40-year-old Brees under center, it’s difficult to argue with that win-now approach, but the strategy has limited New Orleans’ ability to place multiple bets in the draft. In 2018, the Saints started the draft with only 30.2 point of draft value (29th in the league), and my preliminary calculations have the club in the same range or lower for 2019.

In fact, following a series of trades executed by general manager Mickey Loomis, New Orleans has only one selection — No. 62 — inside the draft’s first 167 picks. The Saints didn’t just give those picks away, of course, as they moved up to acquire defensive end Marcus Davenport in the first round of last year’s draft before picking up veterans Teddy Bridgewater and Eli Apple for third- and fourth-round slots, respectively. But barring a trade down next month, New Orleans will make only one choice within the first five rounds of the 2019 draft.

If the Saints want to find a center via the draft, history tells us they should use that 62nd overall pick to do so. Why? It’s pretty hard to find a center in the later rounds of the draft. I looked at all the centers taken in the fifth round or later of each draft since 2011, the year when the NFL’s new collective bargaining agreement was installed. That CBA put more limitations on practice time, which likely made it harder to develop players at more cerebral positions such as center.

From 2011-17, 18 centers were drafted in Rounds 5-7. Of those 18, only three (16.7%) started more than 10 games during their respective rookie seasons: Jason Kelce (2011 Eagles), Corey Linsley (2014 Packers), and Luke Bowanko (2014 Jaguars). It’s difficult enough to find starting-caliber players at any position in the fifth round or later, but adding a late-round starter at center — where that player will be expected to make protection calls from day one — seems exceedingly risky.

So who could the Saints look at with their second-round pick? Dane Brugler of The Athletic (subscription required) lists four center within his top-80 2019 prospects. North Carolina State’s Garrett Bradbury comes in at No. 14, so he’s unlikely to be available for New Orleans when its 62nd selection rolls around, but Texas A&M’s Erik McCoy (No. 40), Mississippi State’s Elgton Jenkins (No. 44), and Penn State’s Connor McGovern (No. 78) could be in consideration.

Trade

Center depth isn’t plentiful around the NFL, so most teams aren’t going to be lining up to trade their the pivot to the suddenly-needy Saints. And as we’ve already discussed, New Orleans doesn’t have the sort of early-round draft capital needed to target an established starter. More likely, the Saints will need to swap one of its late-round selections — either in this year’s draft or from 2020 — in order to land a current backup.

Here are a few options the Saints could target via trade:

Ethan Pocic (Seahawks): Pocic was the 58th overall pick as recently as 2017, but he wasn’t a key factor on a Seattle offensive line that greatly improved in 2018. Under new offensive line coach Mike Solari, the Seahawks moved from 30th in Football Outsiders’ adjusted line yards — which attempts to parse out responsibility for a club’s run-game success — to 12th in 2018, but Pocic started just four games and played only 296 offensive snaps. Viewed as a poor scheme fit for Seattle, Pocic doesn’t really have a role heading into the 2019 campaign, meaning he could be available for a cheap price.

Billy Price (Bengals): Cincinnati doesn’t typically admit its draft mistakes in short order, so the idea of the club moving on from Price after only one season is probably far-fetched. And it’s not entirely fair to call Price a mistake: while PFF charted him as a bottom-four center and one of the lowest-graded first-round rookies, Price was still recovering from a torn pectoral when the regular season got underway, and later missed six games with a foot injury. Still, the Bengals now have a new coaching staff in place, and placed a second-round tender on 26-year-old restricted free agent Trey Hopkins, who excelled at center in Price’s absence.

Ted Karras (Patriots): New England offensive line coach Dante Scarnecchia is a miracle-worker. Two of his former pupils — left tackles Nate Solder and Trent Brown — have reset the offensive line market in consecutive offseasons, and the Patriots’ front five ranked top-three in both adjusted sack rate and adjusted line yards last year. Maybe Karras could bring some of that wisdom to New Orleans? Although he’s only started five games over three seasons, it’s not like Karras hasn’t put anything on tape, as PFF placed him on its All-Preseason team in 2018 after he allowed just one sack and one hurry on 82 pass-blocking snaps.

Free Agency

The first wave of free agency is already over four days after the market officially opened, and the top two free agent centers are off the board. Mitch Morse became the league’s highest-paid center after agreeing to a four-year, $44MM deal with the Bills, while the Panthers landed Matt Paradis on a three-year, $27MM pact. Other veterans capable of playing center, such as Spencer Long, Eric Kush, Jonotthan Harrison are already spoken for, too, leaving the Saints with few options if they want go the free agency route.

However, New Orleans still has a small list of available centers that are capable of starting:

Nick Easton: This is the one free agent center we know the Saints are targeting, as Easton met with New Orleans last week. The 26-year-old Easton has interest from the Vikings — for whom he played from 2015-18 — and at least one other unidentified team, so New Orleans may have to up its offer in order to land him. That could be a problem given left tackle Terron Armstead, left guard Andrus Peat, and right guard Larry Warford will each count for more than $9MM on the Saints’ 2019 salary cap. Easton, for his part, started 12 games at guard and center for the 2018 Vikings, but missed all of last season with a neck injury.

John Sullivan: The Rams opted to decline Sullivan’s option for the 2019 season, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s no longer able to play. Los Angeles would have had to pay Sullivan $4.25MM for next year plus a $2MM option bonus, and that sum would have placed the 11-year veteran inside the top-15 highest-paid centers. At age-33, Sullivan is no longer worth that money. The real problem, though, was Sullivan’s production: while he was as available as ever (16 starts and 95.8% of snaps), Sullivan allowed 37 pressures, the most of any center in the league per PFF.

Travis Swanson: A former third-round pick of the Lions, Swanson has plenty of experience under his belt, having started 53 games over the past five seasons. Working against Swanson is the fact that he was released by the Jets — a team that desperately needed competent offensive linemen — last September. Swanson, rebounded, however, latching on with the Dolphins and eventually becoming Miami’s starter for 12 games after Daniel Kilgore went down with a season-ending injury. He played 92% of the Dolphins’ snaps after taking over, allowing only 2.5 sacks and committing just one penalty, per Stats LLC.

Brett Jones: Jones isn’t a very attractive option if you look only at 2018, as he started just three games after being traded from the Giants to the Vikings in exchange for a seventh-round pick. Jump back one season, though, and Jones looks like a starting-caliber player. A former undrafted free agent, Jones started 13 games and excelled for New York in 2017. PFF assigned him its fourth-highest pass-blocking efficiency score among centers, and charged him with multiple pressures allowed in just one of his starts. That performance was enough for the Giants to utilize a second-round restricted free agent tender on Jones.

Stefen Wisniewski: Still only 29 years old, Wisniewski was benched by the Eagles in Week 5 after a lackluster performance at left guard. Wisniewski hasn’t played center since the 2015 campaign, but it was his primary position from 2011-15 when he made 77 starts for the Raiders and Jaguars. He’s probably a better fit for the Saints as a contingency plan rather than as an outright starter.