Bengals, DT Dexter Lawrence Agree To One-Year Extension
APRIL 23: The new Lawrence deal will pay out $11MM in base salary along with a $10MM roster bonus and $1MM in per-game roster bonuses next season, as detailed by The Athletic’s Dan Duggan. 2027 also contains an option bonus ($8.25MM) along with the same roster bonuses and a workout bonus. Lawrence is due to collect $5MM more across the next two years than he was with the Giants, and the Bengals will easily be able to move on after that span.
APRIL 19: The trade sending DT Dexter Lawrence from the Giants to the Bengals in exchange for the No. 10 overall pick in this week’s draft also featured a revised contract. ESPN’s Adam Schefter was first to report that Lawrence has inked a one-year, $28MM extension that will keep him under the Bengals’ control through 2028.
A report that emerged in the immediate aftermath of the trade suggested the Giants did make an effort to retain Lawrence even after the Bengals put the No. 10 pick on the table. Paul Schwartz of the New York Post corroborates that report and confirms Big Blue made offers that would have resulted in a sizable raise for Lawrence, which the 28-year-old obviously declined.
Connor Hughes of SNY.tv adds that the Giants’ proposals included an average annual value “near” $28MM, but in exchange, they wanted to add more years to Lawrence’s existing deal (which had two seasons remaining). Per Hughes, Lawrence’s camp did not even make a counteroffer, which – combined with the relatively modest terms of his Cincinnati extension – make it plain that the player simply wanted a fresh start elsewhere.
Myles Simmons of Pro Football Talk passes along a full breakdown of Lawrence’s Cincinnati deal. He was due $42MM over the final two seasons of his Joe Schoen-constructed contract, and the $28MM add-on makes it a three-year, $70MM agreement. The $23.33MM average annual value places Lawrence 10th among defensive tackles, just one spot higher than he was before the trade (though he will get some near-term raises; he was previously scheduled to earn $20MM in 2026 and $22MM in 2027, but he is now due $22MM in ‘26, $25MM in ‘27, and $23MM in ‘28, as Fox Sports’ Ralph Vacchiano summarizes).
Lawrence’s potential impact on a Cincinnati defense that has undermined the club’s chances of qualifying for the playoffs in recent seasons, together with a financial commitment that does not shoot their new acquisition particularly high up the league’s DT hierarchy, help to justify the Bengals’ uncharacteristic aggressiveness here. That said, league sources still believe the Giants did well to land the No. 10 choice.
Hughes spoke with several coaches who were “stunned” by the return. Those coaches agreed that Lawrence is a very good player but pointed to his age and conditioning as cause for concern, as well as the fact that he needs to be kept on something of a snap count to maximize his production. ESPN’s Jordan Raanan says the Giants themselves were surprised by the strength of the Bengals’ offer, and Raanan’s colleague, Jeremy Fowler, hears no one was going to top it.
Lawrence is coming off a down year – albeit one Schoen partially blamed on the elbow injury the three-time Pro Bowler sustained late in 2024 – and even though their gamble is mitigated to some degree by the nature of the extension, the Bengals are clearly banking on a return to elite form. In a statement issued after the trade became official, director of player personnel Duke Tobin made sure to thank much-maligned owner Mike Brown for greenlighting the transaction and added that he expects Lawrence to elevate the players around him (the full statement is available here, courtesy of SI’s Jay Morrison).
Lawrence is the centerpiece of an offseason defensive overhaul in the Queen City that also includes the additions of Jonathan Allen, Boye Mafe, Bryan Cook, and Kyle Dugger. The Giants, meanwhile, could consider one of the top DT prospects in the draft as a Lawrence replacement, and they now have two top-10 selections to aid in their quest for a return to contention.
No Other Team Offered Giants First-Rounder For Dexter Lawrence; Draft Calculations Influenced Bengals’ Proposal
It is quite rare to see a team part with a top-10 pick for a veteran. While numerous examples exist of this happening throughout NFL history, only twice this century has a team knowingly traded a top-10 choice for a player leading up to a draft.
This happened in 2022, when the Broncos included their No. 9 overall pick in a package for Russell Wilson. It previously occurred in 2005, when the Raiders sent the No. 7 overall pick to the Vikings in a package for Randy Moss (the Seahawks did better with their draft choice, selecting Charles Cross 17 years after the Vikes chose wide receiver bust Troy Williamson). The Giants now have a chance to use two top-10 picks in a draft for the second time since 2022, having acquired No. 10 overall for Dexter Lawrence.
Fallout from the weekend blockbuster revealed some among the Giants were surprised by the Bengals’ offer, and The Athletic’s Ian O’Connor reports no other team offered New York a first-round pick for the All-Pro defensive tackle.
Lawrence, 28, was seeking a contract update but may have been nearly as interested in being traded out of New York. The Giants made multiple offers near the $28MM-per-year point, but the deals included more years of control. Already under contract through 2027 as part of his four-year, $90MM extension in 2023, Lawrence agreed to a one-year, $28MM re-up that pushes his Bengals control through 2028.
“When this opportunity came, I jumped at it,” Lawrence said, via O’Connor. “…I felt ease when I said I was going to be a Cincinnati Bengal. It felt good to me.”
The Bengals have displayed uncharacteristic aggressiveness here. Not known for splashy outside acquisitions, Cincinnati has now added Lawrence, Boye Mafe and Bryan Cook this offseason. A defense in dire need of upgrades lost Trey Hendrickson to the Ravens, and while the No. 10 overall pick represents a valuable resource — it is the highest of the seven first-round picks swapped ahead of this year’s draft — NFL.com’s Tom Pelissero notes Cincy pre-draft simulations did not produce optimal answers at that spot. A Bengals source informed Pelissero “10 would have been a slow death.”
Cincinnati had been tied to the likes of Caleb Downs and Mansoor Delane at No. 10; our Ely Allen mocked Downs to southwest Ohio. But Downs has also been linked to the Giants at No. 5. It is far from certain Downs falls to 10, and this trade seemingly indicates the Bengals do not believe the standout Ohio State safety will be available (it would certainly be interesting if he is, as the Giants would now be in prime position to pounce).
Defenders Sonny Styles, Arvell Reese and David Bailey will almost definitely be gone by No. 10, and Rueben Bain Jr. may be as well. The Bengals felt they would be picking someone at 10 that drew a mid- or late-first-round grade internally, SI.com’s Albert Breer adds.
Giants GM Joe Schoen indicated contract talks would happen at the Combine; instead, Lawrence asked for a trade if no new deal was coming, ESPN.com’s Jordan Raanan and Ben Baby report. The trade ask did not leak until earlier this month, and although the Giants attempted to keep their seven-year D-line anchor, the No. 10 overall pick is a difficult offer to decline. The sides never got close on a new contract, per ESPN.
When negotiations were heading south, Lawrence’s agent prevented his client from speaking with John Harbaugh, according to the New York Post’s Paul Schwartz. This became a source of frustration for the Giants, per Schwartz, as the team made attempts to convince the dominant interior D-lineman to stay.
Lawrence’s camp approached the Giants about this issue at the 2025 Combine, Breer adds, but the team did not budge due to the precedent caving to a player with three years left on a deal would set. The sides settled on a $3MM incentive package last year.
Guarantees represented a sticking point for Lawrence and the Giants during their recent negotiations, Breer adds, and that led to Lawrence’s agent negotiating a contract with the Bengals. The Giants granted the Bengals permission to speak with Lawrence midday Saturday, Breer adds. The Giants were informed late Saturday afternoon Lawrence and the Bengals had agreed on terms, greenlighting the trade.
The Bengals reunite Lawrence with B.J. Hill, a D-tackle they acquired from the Giants (for guard Ben Bredeson) in 2021. Hill and Lawrence played together in New York for two seasons. The Bengals have loaded up at DT this offseason, adding Lawrence and Jonathan Allen to a group that included Hill and T.J. Slaton. Lawrence’s addition should help the likes of Mafe, Myles Murphy and Shemar Stewart at D-end as well.
This trade guts the Giants’ DT corps. New York ranked 31st in run stoppage with Lawrence active in 17 games last season. The team discussed pairing Lawrence with ex-Bengal D.J. Reader, per Schwartz, who expects the latter to sign post-draft. Reader visited the Giants last week. While the veteran nose tackle also met with the Ravens, he is unlikely to sign until the draft wraps. That will allow for Reader to survey the D-line landscape across the league while allowing the Giants to avoid the signing affecting their 2027 compensatory formula. But Reader may not be the only addition the Giants make at D-tackle moving forward.
Last year, Burrow pushed for a Hendrickson extension on multiple occasions. The Bengals did not offer the decorated edge rusher a contract with post-Year 1 guarantees, keeping with non-Burrow/Ja’Marr Chase franchise norms. Hendrickson balked at the proposal and agreed to a one-year pay raise. Cincy also engaged in a frosty rookie-deal negotiation with Stewart. These staredowns managed to revive Bengals thriftiness labels despite the team shelling out big money to retain Chase and Tee Higgins earlier last year. Burrow frustration resurfaced late in the season, to the point trade noise emerged (before being quickly quieted).
The Bengals were never going to seriously consider trading Burrow, but the quarterback’s frustration — which is not entirely in a different place from where Carson Palmer’s issues settled — may have been at least a partial influence for this blockbuster trade. Cincy extended Higgins because of its quarterback’s push, and after Burrow did not shoot down a question about potentially playing elsewhere at some point — with a reported aim to apply pressure on the team — the AFC North team has made a few big moves to bolster a porous defense. That raises the stakes for Zac Taylor‘s eighth season in charge.
Giants, Bengals Agree To DT Dexter Lawrence Trade
Dexter Lawrence is indeed on the move. The Pro Bowl defensive tackle’s trade request will result in a swap sending him to the AFC North.
The Giants and Bengals have agreed to a Lawrence trade, Ian Rapoport and Mike Garafolo of NFL Network report. This deal involves the No. 10 pick in next week’s draft heading to New York. An extension is also part of this blockbuster development, per the report. Cincinnati’s Day 1 selection is the only draft capital involved in the deal, ESPN’s Jordan Raanan adds.
[RELATED: Traded Draft Picks For 2026]
Lawrence was unable to work out an extension agreement last offseason, with a short-term incentive package being agreed to instead. The arrival of head coach John Harbaugh and a new reporting structure in the organization did not yield progress during the latest round of negotiations, prompting a trade request shortly before the draft. The immediate response indicated a swap was not expected, but it soon became clear the Giants were not interested in adding term or new money to the remainder of Lawrence’s contract. Talks broke off earlier this week, although team and player remained in communication leading up to tonight’s news.
In recent days it has become well known that Lawrence was open to a fresh start and that New York did not feel a sense of urgency to commit to a raise with the veteran coming off the least productive season of his career. The Giants understandably set a high asking price in this case, with a top-10 pick being sought out. They have managed to land one, and the team now holds selections No. 5 and 10 heading into the first round.
NFL insider Jordan Schultz reports efforts on the part of the Bengals to finalize this swap picked up over the past several days. Albert Breer of Sports Illustrated adds the teams have been in contact for two weeks, with discussions centering on the price of a premium pick. The Giants initially tried to keep Lawrence even after receiving the Bengals’ offer, per SNY’s Connor Hughes; with the relationship beyond repair, the deal has now been agreed to. New York’s draft outlook is certainly much different now than it previously was.
The Giants will clear Lawrence’s remaining salaries for 2026 and ’27 from their books. With this swap taking place prior to June 1, the team will incur a dead money charge ($13.92MM) nearly identical to the cap savings ($13.04MM) which will be realized. Replacing Lawrence deep into free agency and/or by means of a draft class short on high-end defensive line prospects will now be a major priority.
From the Bengals’ perspective, this is an uncharacteristically aggressive move. Cincinnati has a reputation for avoiding high-profile transactions such as this, although the franchise’s approach has seen changes in recent years given the massive commitments made to the likes of Joe Burrow, Ja’Marr Chase and Tee Higgins. Investing heavily in those three has helped lead to defensive shortcomings, and upgrading on that side of the ball has been a key focus this offseason. Illustrating the nature of this acquisition, Raanan’s colleague Adam Schefter notes this is the first time in the common draft era (1966-present) the Bengals have traded away a top-10 pick.
The Bengals have made a number of defensive free agent additions, including the signing of Jonathan Allen not long after his release. He and Lawrence will aim to improve a defense which struggled in a number of categories in 2025, including a last-place finish against the run. Cincinnati showed interest in trading for Osa Odighizuwa last month, but after being unable to swing a deal on that front the team has managed to secure a major addition along the defensive interior. Lawrence, 28, has three Pro Bowl nods and two appearances on the second All-Pro team to his name.
Returning to his previous form would be critical for the Clemson product and the Bengals’ ability to reach the postseason in 2026. Lawrence has been one of the league’s premiere interior pass rushers for much of his career, but last season saw him post just 0.5 sacks and 12 QB pressures. That drop-off in production was a key reason driving the Giants’ hesitancy with respect to a new deal moving Lawrence back toward the top of the defensive tackle market. Prior to this agreement, his $22.5MM-per-year pact sat outside the top 10 for the position.
Lowering Lawrence’s 2026 cap charge will be key for Cincinnati. The team entered Saturday 31st in the NFL in cap space with nowhere near enough room to absorb his figure and afford to sign its incoming draft class. The particulars will certainly be worth watching for as the Bengals prepare to build around Lawrence while authorizing a big-money deal in addition to a substantial acquisition cost.
Giants, Dexter Lawrence Remain In Talks
Contract talks between the Giants and defensive tackle Dexter Lawrence broke off earlier this week, but chances of the sides finding common ground are not dead yet. The Giants and Lawrence “are still talking,” according to Paul Schwartz of the New York Post. There remains hope the seven-year veteran will continue his career with the Giants, who chose him 17th overall in the 2019 draft.
Lawrence’s dissatisfaction with the Giants stems from what’s left of the four-year, $90MM extension he signed in 2023. The four-time Pro Bowler is due to earn $19.5MM in each of the next two seasons, but he wants an appreciable raise and more guaranteed money. The Giants have already paid out all $60MM in guarantees on his deal.
The salary cap was set at $224.8MM when Lawrence inked his extension. It has since skyrocketed to $301.2MM, and Lawrence wants in on the action. Eagles defensive tackle Jordan Davis, a less accomplished player than Lawrence, signed a three-year, $78MM extension with $65MM in guarantees in March. Lawrence is unhappy he is now earning far less than the the $26MM per annum Davis and Patriots DT Milton Williams are making, according to Schwartz.
As of Thursday, it did not appear the Giants had any desire to adjust Lawrence’s contract. But they are willing to offer a “significant financial upgrade” that includes guarantees, per Schwartz. Lawrence is “dug in” on his asking price, though it is unclear how far apart he and the Giants are.
Discussing the situation with Schwartz, new head coach John Harbaugh said: “We are working together to get the best outcome for the Giants team. We also respect Dexter fully as a person and player and want him to be happy. We are doing everything we can, as best we can, as responsibly as we can.’’
If an agreement does not materialize in the next handful of days, we could see Lawrence change hands before or during the draft. The first round will take place Thursday, which is when things could come to a head in this case. However, it appears it would require quite a haul to pry Lawrence from the Giants. They are aiming for a top-10 pick in return for the 28-year-old, Schwartz relays. The Giants may accept a pick later in the first round, but they would also want additional selections with it.
Giants DT Dexter Lawrence Wants Out; Latest On Potential Trade
April 17: The Giants have, appropriately, a massive asking price for their hulking nose tackle. Not only are they seeking first- and second-round picks for Lawrence, they want the first-rounder to be in the top 10, per Schwartz. If it is outside of the top 10, New York will ask for additional picks to make up the value. That is an unrealistic asking price, ESPN’s Jordan Raanan notes, which “signifies [that the] Giants aren’t serious about trading Dexter Lawrence.”
April 16: Unhappy with a contract that does not include any more guaranteed money, Giants defensive tackle Dexter Lawrence requested a trade earlier this month. The Giants and Lawrence continued contract talks after he asked out, but those negotiations broke off on Wednesday.
While the Giants trading the disgruntled Lawrence is a possibility, it is not a lock. Lawrence does indeed want out, per reports from CBS Sports’ Jonathan Jones and Paul Schwartz of the New York Post. However, the Giants are not giving him away at a discounted rate.
The Giants want at least a first-round pick for the four-time Pro Bowler, according to Jones, who floats the idea of the team demanding a 2027 first- and a 2026 second-rounder for Lawrence. Doing so would give the Giants until Day 2 of this year’s draft to find a trade partner. If Lawrence is still a Giant on Day 3, April 25, it may take a long time for a trade to come together (if it happens at all).
The most recent trade involving a star defensive tackle came last November when the Jets shipped Quinnen Williams to the Cowboys. Dallas parted with the aforementioned 2027 first- and 2026 second-rounder package. The Cowboys also threw in D-tackle Mazi Smith, a 2023 first-rounder who has been a bust. The Giants are probably not in position to receive that strong of an offer, though, considering an acquiring team would have to give Lawrence a raise. Conversely, the Cowboys did not have to make any adjustments to Williams’ contract.
Lawrence is owed $19.5MM in each of the next two seasons, but Jones writes that he “will likely” climb into the upper $20MM range on a new deal. With Lawrence angling for more money, one source told Schwartz the Giants may not even get a first-rounder for the 28-year-old Lawrence, adding that “[he] will be in camp, he’s got nowhere to go.”
A Giant since they chose him 17th overall in the 2019 draft, Lawrence put pen to paper on his current pact – a four-year, $90MM extension with $60MM in guarantees – in May 2023. Joe Schoen, the general manager who authorized the contract, is still in his post. But Lawrence has been frustrated with how the team has been run and “what’s been valued in the locker room” over the past three years, Ryan Dunleavy of the New York Post writes. He has been open to a trade dating to the start of last year, Jordan Raanan of ESPN adds. Schoen has since lost power to new head coach John Harbaugh, but Lawrence’s frustration with the organization has not subsided.
While Dunleavy believes Lawrence would accept a “big raise” from the Giants, they are not not inclined to give him one. A trade does not appear imminent either, though the Giants have have held talks with other teams, per Raanan. With the draft starting a week from tonight, this will remain a fascinating situation to monitor.
Giants, Dexter Lawrence Break Off Contract Talks; Latest On DT’s Trade Market
Although contract talks between the Giants and Dexter Lawrence were not perceived as dead as of Tuesday, the latest updates bring a step backward for the two parties. An impasse has given way to the sides ending this round of negotiations.
The Giants and Lawrence have broken off talks, according to the New York Daily News’ Pat Leonard. While Joe Schoen said Tuesday that he, John Harbaugh and new front office hire Dawn Aponte had been discussing terms with Lawrence, the All-Pro defensive tackle had requested a trade because the sides were far apart in previous conversations.
No trade is imminent, but Leonard adds significant interest exists from other teams. Even though Leonard adds there is a “real possibility” the Giants trade Lawrence, the New York Post’s Paul Schwartz pushes back by indicating the team is not actively engaged in trade talks. No trade conversations have occurred in at least five days, per Schwartz, who contradicts Leonard’s note about trade interest by writing that the 28-year-old DT has not in fact brought strong trade interest yet.
With Lawrence seeking a hefty raise despite coming off a down 2025 season, this trade market may have a lower cap than the Giants would prefer. A Quinnen Williams-like haul has been mentioned as a comp, but the fellow 2019 first-round D-tackle did not require an immediate payday. A team trading for Lawrence would need to sign off on a raise. We have seen that component of trade talks lead to lesser offers in the recent past, and the Giants are still controlling this operation. Lawrence’s camp has not received permission to shop around yet, Pro Football Talk’s Mike Florio notes.
Viewing Lawrence as a cornerstone piece, the Giants have balked at giving in to this trade request. This has not devolved into a situation where the team will take the best offer ahead of the draft, SNY’s Connor Hughes adds, and NFL.com’s Mike Garafolo mentions receiving picks in the 2027 draft — viewed as set to feature a better class than 2026’s — would probably appeal to the team. The Giants do not view the draft as a trade deadline here, despite the pressure Lawrence’s camp is applying. Lawrence’s four-year, $90MM contract runs through the 2027 season, and with the Giants preferring to keep him, Garafolo points to this process dragging on for a while.
Lawrence played out the guarantees on his deal last season, and Schoen said ahead of the Combine that would likely coincide with a push from the player’s camp for an updated deal. Guarantees may not be driving this push, though, with The Athletic’s Dan Duggan adding Lawrence sought a new contract last year despite guarantees remaining on the pact. Lawrence has pushed for a new contract for nearly two years, according to Leonard. He and the Giants settled on a $3MM incentive package; Lawrence collected $1MM during a season in which he totaled just a half-sack and a career-low eight QB hits.
Instead, this is more about a new contract that vaults Lawrence back toward the top of the position’s market. Lawrence’s 2023 extension now sits 11th among interior D-linemen, with less accomplished players — Milton Williams, Nnamdi Madubuike, Jordan Davis and Alim McNeill — surpassing him over the past three offseasons. A $5MM-plus AAV gap still exists between Chris Jones‘ $31.75MM-per-year deal and the field. Lawrence being interested in bridging that gap is understandable, but Schwartz maintains the Giants are not interested in tearing up his deal and authorizing a raise this year.
If the Giants do not trade Lawrence before or during the draft, the next stage in this showdown will be their June minicamp. If/when Lawrence does not show for that, rumors about a training camp holdout will likely emerge, but the standout defender would lose millions before the season if he followed through on that. A hold-in measure may not be especially relevant here, as those are generally reserved for players in negotiations. If the Giants are not interested in paying Lawrence this year, a hold-in may not be practical.
Although Schoen may be on shaky ground after the Harbaugh and Aponte hires stripped power from him, Schwartz adds the GM and HC agree on the team’s handling of this situation. It still appears the Giants are ready to force Lawrence’s hand and make him earn a new deal this season, but they are listening to offers. It will take a strong proposal to convince the team (31st in 2025 run defense) to move on before the draft. With this draft class not viewed as a DT-rich crop, big offers could come. But it does not sound like the Giants have fielded a host of them yet.
Giants, Dexter Lawrence At ‘Impasse’
The Giants have been in contract talks with disgruntled defensive lineman Dexter Lawrence, but those discussions have not been productive. The sides are at an “impasse,” Ian Rapoport of NFL Network reports. With the Giants continuing to discuss Lawrence in trades, a resolution is expected before the draft, per Rapoport.
Speaking with the media on Tuesday, general manager Joe Schoen indicated the Giants had not set a draft deadline to settle Lawrence’s future. It appears an answer will come by then, though. The Giants, who already own the fifth pick in the draft, are expected to get a first-rounder back if a Lawrence trade occurs, according to Connor Hughes of SNY. This is not considered a strong draft class for defensive tackles, which should boost Lawrence’s value across the league, Jeremy Fowler of ESPN notes.
As the 17th overall pick in 2019, Lawrence joined the Giants a few years before Schoen took over as their GM. Schoen, then in his second offseason on the job, authorized a four-year, $90MM extension for Lawrence in May 2023. The pact included $60MM in guarantees and made the two-time second-team All-Pro one of the richest defensive tackles in the NFL. Three years later, Lawrence ranks seventh among DTs in guarantees, 11th in total value and 13th in average salary.
Now unhappy with where he stands in the financial pecking order at his position, the 28-year-old Lawrence requested a trade last week. He is still signed through 2027 and due to count just under $27MM against the cap in each of the next two years.. Lawrence is owed a non-guaranteed $18.5MM base salary next season, but an acquiring team would have to give him a raise.
The Chargers are considered one “logical” fit, a source told Tyler Dragon of USA Today. That would mean a major trade between new Giants head coach John Harbaugh and Chargers HC Jim Harbaugh. The Harbaugh brothers most recently came together on a trade when the Ravens, then coached by John, sent edge defender Odafe Oweh to the Chargers for safety Alohi Gilman last October. The Chargers now have the third-most cap space in the league ($48.68MM), giving them ample room to pay Lawrence if they are interested in swinging a deal.
Even though John Harbaugh called Lawrence “super, super important” to the Giants’ defense in late February, the team has not been willing to meet the 6-foot-4, 340-pounder’s demands. Harbaugh and first-year senior VP of football ops and strategy Dawn Aponte have wrested power away from Schoen this offseason. All three have engaged in talks with Lawrence, but unless there is a 180 in negotiations over the next week-plus, it appears the four-time Pro Bowler will be on his way out soon.
Giants Still In Talks With Dexter Lawrence, Do Not View Draft As Deadline
The draft represents the second trade window on the NFL calendar, and an All-Pro recently made a request to be moved. The Giants have referred to Dexter Lawrence as a core player, but they have a decision to make — perhaps soon.
Joe Schoen confirmed a previous report the Giants are listening to offers for the veteran defensive tackle, via NFL.com’s Mike Garafolo, but the fifth-year GM said (via the New York Post’s Ryan Dunleavy) he is not treating the draft as a deadline to complete a deal. If the Giants were going to move on, it would expedite their John Harbaugh-headed overhaul if they collected prime draft capital for Lawrence this year. But the team is believed to still want him on Harbaugh’s first Big Blue roster.
[RELATED: Kayvon Thibodeaux Trade Talks Could Pick Up]
Harbaugh, Schoen and senior VP of football ops and strategy Dawn Aponte have engaged in talks with Lawrence over the past week, The Athletic’s Dan Duggan adds. That represents a promising chapter here, but a recent report indicated the Giants are not interested in extending Lawrence this offseason. Lawrence, 28, is coming off a down year — albeit one Schoen partially blamed on the elbow injury he sustained late in 2024 — and has two seasons left on the four-year, $90MM extension agreed to in 2023.
“We’d like for Dexter to be here and at some point we’ll come to a resolution here, whatever that may be. We’ll see,” Schoen said, via Garafolo. “I’m always going to pick up the phone. Maybe not to the (extent) that coach said last week that everybody is tradable. But that is my job as general manager, if teams call … to take into consideration what that looks like, what the compensation looks like, who the player is, how that affects the roster and then try to make the best decision off that.”
The Giants testing Lawrence’s resolve could lead to a minicamp absence and at least a training camp hold-in. The latter route, as opposed to a holdout, would not lead to fines. Hold-in measures typically take place by players in negotiations, but if the Giants are not planning to extend Lawrence this year, a plan to observe practices would lead to a distraction during Harbaugh’s first training camp with the team. Lawrence, who has fallen to 11th among interior D-linemen in terms of AAV, is due a nonguaranteed $18.5MM base salary this year.
The haul the Jets landed for Quinnen Williams — a 2026 second-round pick, a 2027 first and DT Mazi Smith — has come up regarding Lawrence, who earned All-Pro acclaim in 2022 and ’23 before a Pro Bowl 2024 slate that included a career-high nine sacks (in just 12 games). That might be a stretch given Lawrence’s down 2025 campaign and interest in a sizable pay raise. Chris Jones‘ $31.75MM-per-year deal leads DTs in AAV, with the next wave of interior D-linemen coming in south of $27MM per annum. Lawrence figures to at least be looking to bridge that gap, but it may take another year for the Giants to truly come to the table.
New York authorized an incentive package for Lawrence last year, and Harbaugh did not sound like he would appease a player who requested a trade. Lawrence returning to form under new DC Dennard Wilson would up his value ahead of the 2027 offseason, but the Clemson product making this stand now — before his 29th birthday — may be a wiser play than doing so next year (when he will turn 30). It just may be a while before a resolution arrives, and with Schoen losing considerable power this offseason, Harbaugh and Aponte’s views may matter more than the GM’s.
The Giants ranked 31st against the run last year with Lawrence suiting up for 17 games. They have been linked to adding D-linemen, and D.J. Reader visited Monday. But Lawrence will be quite difficult to replace — especially with this draft class not teeming with DT options. The Giants, who hold the No. 5 overall pick, will not be expected to address their D-line until at least Round 2.
It would surprise if Lawrence is moved by next week, with our Adam La Rose viewing Thibodeaux as the more likely player to be dealt this year. But Schoen making it clear he will listen does keep the door open to Harbaugh (who now holds the personnel hammer) deciding to add assets ahead of his first Giants draft.
Giants Willing To Entertain Dexter Lawrence Trade Offers
Since Dexter Lawrence‘s trade request went public, there has been a general expectation a deal sending him away from the Giants will not be worked out. Replacing the three-time Pro Bowler would be challenging for New York, while the list of teams willing to authorize an extension upon acquiring him may be short at this point of the offseason.
Interest will be shown by suitors leading up to the draft in the wake of Giants extension talks once again not yielding progress. Two years remain on Lawrence’s deal, and the team is prepared to move forward without a short-term fix like the one worked out last summer or a raise brought on by a new contract. The willingness of the Giants to seriously entertain offers over the coming days will make for an intriguing storyline.
New head coach John Harbaugh spoke publicly about Lawrence’s value to the team during the onset of the Giants’ offseason program. He also raised eyebrows when stating that “everybody is tradable,” however, and it will be interesting to see if New York winds up being prepared to work out a swap in this case. On that note, ESPN’s Jordan Raanan reports the Giants “will at least listen to” calls made regarding Lawrence’s availability. He confirms the team’s preference would be to keep Lawrence in the fold for 2026, but the financial impasse could prove to be a key factor on the trade front.
Lawrence inked an extension in line with other top defensive tackle extensions in 2024. His deal carries an average annual value of $22.5MM, but that figure has been surpassed multiple times with the position’s market continuing to surge. The 28-year-old managed just 0.5 sacks and 12 pressures in 2025, something which has no doubt complicated his efforts to secure a raise. As things stand, Lawrence is owed $20MM next season and $22MM in 2027.
Teams may very well be hesitant to add to those figures in addition to paying a notable price in a trade. Nevertheless, any contender could stand to benefit from adding Lawrence. The Packers made one blockbuster move by acquiring Micah Parsons last offseason, and executives who spoke with SportsBoom’s Jason La Canfora pointed to Green Bay as a logical suitor with respect to Lawrence. Making another win-now move via the trade route would be out of character for the Packers’ front office, but the seven-year veteran would offer a boost to a defensive interior which has plenty of room for improvement compared to last season.
To date, the Packers have not been connected to any firm interest on the Lawrence front. Whether or not that changes will of course depend in large part on the Giants’ asking price. Raanan notes an offer including two Day 2 picks and another on Day 3 could be in store in the case of the Clemson product. La Canfora also writes a first-round selection – at least, in 2026 – is unlikely to be attainable regardless of how strong Lawrence’s market becomes. Improving at the DT spot is already a Giants priority entering the draft, but that could become true to a much larger extent if trade calls were to produce an agreement.
Giants Not Eyeing Dexter Lawrence Raise
The 2023 offseason established a new salary bracket among interior defensive linemen, bridging the sizable gap between Aaron Donald and the field at the time. Dexter Lawrence was among the ascending D-tackles who did so, joining Quinnen Williams, Jeffery Simmons and Daron Payne in being given top-five DT deals that offseason.
Lawrence, Payne, Simmons and Williams remain tied to those extensions. As could be expected, some other interior D-linemen have passed this quartet as the salary cap has soared. Milton Williams, Jordan Davis and Zach Allen each passed $25MM per year; Davis and his ex-Eagles teammate are at $26MM AAV. Alim McNeill and Nnamdi Madubuike surpassed the above-referenced foursome as well.
By far the best piece of the 2019 Odell Beckham Jr. trade for either the Giants or Browns, Lawrence proved worthy of the four-year, $90MM extension he signed in May 2023. He ventured to three straight Pro Bowls and booked two second-team All-Pro spots (2022, ’23). The popular New York nose tackle then tallied nine sacks in just 12 games in 2024. That led to a push for at least a deal revision in 2025, but the Giants only provided incentives.
While Lawrence has requested a trade based largely on extension talks not progressing, his timing is not great. The Clemson alum is coming off a regression, totaling just a half-sack and a career-low eight QB hits. Lawrence eclipsed 20 hits in 2022 and ’23, and even with Leonard Williams gone by 2024, Lawrence remained in high gear. Joe Schoen also posited some of Lawrence’s 2025 statistical issues stemmed from the elbow dislocation he sustained in 2024. That comment likely resonated with Lawrence’s camp, but the Giants do not seem eager to appease the disgruntled player.
The Giants are eyeing neither a trade nor a raise, with the New York Post’s Paul Schwartz indicating the team does not look to have a strong desire to reward Lawrence after last season. The team would prefer Lawrence play out his current deal, which has two years remaining. No guaranteed money is left on the contract, and John Harbaugh said he anticipated Lawrence skipping the start of the team’s offseason program.
“The Giants, speaking for the Giants, we want Dexter here,” Harbaugh said, via Schwartz. “I believe Dexter wants to be here. That’s a good formula. But there’s business involved. It’s a business proposition. We know it’s pro football. These things happen every year pretty much on every team. Not surprised by it. Saw it coming a few weeks back probably.”
The new Giants HC called Lawrence “super important” earlier this year, as the Giants made it clear he would not be traded to free up any cap space. Rumblings about a trade price matching or exceeding what the Cowboys sent the Jets for Quinnen Williams — a 2027 first-rounder, a 2026 second along with DT Mazi Smith — has surfaced, but Schwartz adds the Giants would need to be “blown away” by a proposal to consider moving on.
“I don’t know that granting a request is really the right way to say it, because it doesn’t really work that way,” Harbaugh said. “It’s not like a Christmas gift, it just doesn’t work like that.”
As the DT market shifted in 2023, Harbaugh was part of a key standoff that offseason. He and the Ravens held firm against Lamar Jackson‘s trade request and worked out an extension for the superstar quarterback. This Lawrence situation represents Harbaugh’s first notable test on the contract front as the Giants’ top decisionmaker.
How New York proceeds could reveal how much power Schoen still has. The hire of longtime NFL exec Dawn Aponte as VP of football ops undercut the GM’s organizational influence. She and Harbaugh running the show may not be great news for Lawrence, a Dave Gettleman draftee whom Schoen extended.
A hardline stance will not go over well with the decorated D-lineman’s camp, either, as he has fallen to No. 11 in terms of DT AAV ($22.5MM). Lawrence, 28, also played out the guarantees on his contract. That point of a deal regularly spurs action, and Lawrence is proceeding down this path.
It sounds like the Giants are prepared to wait out the eighth-year standout, who is due a nonguaranteed $18.5MM base salary this season. Lawrence’s next step will be to withhold services at mandatory minicamp. That would bring a small fine. This dragging to training camp would certainly be interesting, as Lawrence would then be put to a hold-in or holdout decision.
Players almost never sit out regular-season games in contract stalemates, though Chris Jones — the DT position’s current salary kingpin — did so in 2023. We are a ways away from Lawrence needing to make that call, but as an impact player on a defense that ranked 31st against the run last season, staying away from workouts will certainly command the attention of the new Giants regime.