Poll: Who Will Be First Non-QB Selected?
Quarterbacks are dominating this year’s draft discussion even more than the NFL’s marquee position’s prospects usually do. With the possibility of four signal-callers going in the top five, it opens the door for a wide variety of scenarios.
But with this many passers projected to go high, teams that either do not need a quarterback (this would include the Browns at No. 4, if they keep their pick) — or franchises on the fence about selecting one in the top five (see: Giants, Broncos) — could find themselves in position to land an impact talent that may not have been available to them in another year.
There doesn’t seem to be a consensus about the top non-QB in this draft, either. Players like Saquon Barkley, Bradley Chubb and Quenton Nelson are high on draft boards. Denzel Ward may be as well, with Roquan Smith having visited teams holding top-10 picks. So, who goes first?
Chubb and Barkley have made the most noise here, with the latest coming out of the Big Apple aligning the Giants with the Penn State running back. Viewed as a superior talent when compared to recent No. 4 overall choices Ezekiel Elliott and Leonard Fournette, Barkley has been connected to the Giants at No. 2 and the Browns at No. 4. Although the Browns are not expected to bypass a quarterback at No. 1, Barkley’s name is the one mentioned as a possibility for Cleveland at No. 1 that isn’t a QB. And there may or may not be an issue with a Barkley-to-Cleveland scenario.
Viable running backs are obviously easier to obtain in later rounds than pass-rushing talent, and Chubb has visited the Giants and drawn praise from Hue Jackson as a possible No. 4 overall selection. James Bettcher doesn’t see a problem fitting the N.C. State defensive end into his 3-4 scheme at outside linebacker, and edge rushers are much more valuable commodities than running backs.
Nelson is reportedly a top-three player on the Giants’ board, and Dave Gettleman has not made it a secret he wants an offensive line metamorphosis to take place under his watch. Nelson’s been tabbed a prospect on the Zack Martin tier. Should a quarterback rush occur ahead of them, the Broncos are also in need of a guard. Buzz about a Broncos/Nelson union has emerged, with Ward — the latest high-end cornerback Ohio State has developed — on that level as of late as well.
The Notre Dame-trained blocker being the first non-passer selected would be a massive change of direction. This century, only one team — the 2015 Redskins — took a guard in the top five. And Brandon Scherff was viewed as a tackle prospect at the time. Ward would also represent a major upset as the first position player taken as well, but former Buckeyes teammate Joey Bosa didn’t receive a ton of buzz to go No. 3 to the Chargers two years ago. And this program has produced some high-caliber corners in recent years, as Bradley Roby and Marshon Lattimore have shown.
Who will even make this pick? The Giants have visited with each of the top quarterbacks and have been mentioned as Sam Darnold fans for a while, so it’s not certain they’ll be making this pick. If the Browns take Josh Allen at No. 1 and trade their No. 4 pick to the Bills, the Broncos could be thrust into this role at No. 5.
So, which one of these prospects will hear his name called first? Vote in PFR’s latest poll and weigh in with your thoughts in the comments section!
2019 Fifth-Year Option Decision Tracker
Teams across the NFL have until May 3 to officially pick up their 2019 options on players who are entering the final year of their rookie contracts. These fifth-year options can only be exercised on first-round picks, and the salaries are determined by where players were drafted and what position they play.
If a player has his option exercised, his rookie contract will be extended by one year and he’ll be eligible for unrestricted free agency in 2020, after the conclusion of the 2019 season. If a player’s option is declined, he’ll be eligible to hit the open market a year earlier. Of course, if a 2015 first-rounder is no longer on his rookie contract, there will be no option to exercise or decline. We explained the intricacies of the fifth-year option in a PFR Glossary post, so you can read up on the specific details there.
Soon, we’ll learn the official salary figures for all 2019 fifth-year options. What we do know is that the option salaries for top 10 picks is equal to the transition tender at the player’s position during his fourth season. So, because the transition tag for quarterbacks this year was $20.922MM, we already know that Marcus Mariota and Jameis Winston‘s fifth-year option will be worth that amount.
With next month’s deadline looming, we’ll use the space below to track all the option decisions from around the league based on various reports and official announcements. Here are this season’s fifth-year option decisions so far:
1. Jameis Winston, QB, $20.922MM (Buccaneers): Exercised
2. Marcus Mariota, QB, $20.922MM (Titans): Exercised
3. Dante Fowler, DE, $14.2MM (Jaguars): Declined
4. Amari Cooper, WR, $13.924MM (Raiders): Exercised
5. Brandon Scherff, G, $12.525MM (Redskins): Exercised
6. Leonard Williams, DE, $14.2MM (Jets): Exercised
7. Kevin White, WR, $13.924MM (Bears): Declined
8. Vic Beasley, DE, $14.2MM (Falcons): Exercised
9. Ereck Flowers, OT, $12.525MM (Giants): Declined
10. Todd Gurley, RB, $9.630MM (Rams): Exercised
11. Trae Waynes, CB, $9.069MM (Vikings): Exercised
12. Danny Shelton, DT, $7.154MM (Patriots): Declined
13. Andrus Peat, OL, $9.625MM (Saints): Exercised
14. DeVante Parker, WR, $9.387MM (Dolphins): Exercised
15. Melvin Gordon, RB, $5.605MM (Chargers): Exercised
16. Kevin Johnson, CB, $9.069MM (Texans): Exercised
17. Arik Armstead, DE, $9.046MM (49ers): Exercised
18. Marcus Peters, CB, $9.069MM (Rams): Exercised
19. Cameron Erving, OL, $9.625MM (Chiefs): Declined
20. Nelson Agholor, WR, $9.387MM (Eagles): Exercised
21. Cedric Ogbuehi, OT, $9.625MM (Bengals): Declined
22. Bud Dupree, LB, $9.232MM (Steelers): Exercised
23. Shane Ray, LB, $9.232MM (Broncos): Declined
24. D.J. Humphries, OT, $9.625MM (Cardinals): Exercised
25. Shaq Thompson, LB, $9.232MM (Panthers): Exercised
26. Breshad Perriman, WR, $9.387MM (Ravens): Declined
27. Byron Jones, S, $6.26MM (Cowboys): Exercised
28. Laken Tomlinson, G, $9.625MM (49ers): Declined
29. Phillip Dorsett, WR, $9.387MM (Patriots): Declined
30. Damarious Randall, CB, $9.069MM (Browns): Exercised
31. Stephone Anthony, LB, $9.232MM (Dolphins): Declined
32. Malcom Brown, DT, $7.154MM (Patriots): Declined
Poll: Should Broncos Draft A QB At No. 5?
Having missed the playoffs the past two seasons largely because of quarterback play, the Broncos face one of the draft’s most interesting decisions. Do they attempt to use their rare top-five real estate to invest in the kind of quarterback not usually available to them, or do they try to help Case Keenum this season with a best-player-available choice?
While the 2016 Eagles and 2017 Bears used a top-five pick on a quarterback despite having authorized a starter-level contract earlier in those years, the Broncos are operating on a different timeline since the cornerstone players on their team are the veterans held over from their Super Bowl team three seasons ago.
It would help the Von Miller-, Chris Harris– and Demaryius Thomas-fronted contingent this season if Keenum’s breakout 2017 was legitimate and not a product of what he was working with in Minnesota. The Broncos receiving improved quarterback play and selecting an instant starter/early contributor at No. 5 overall would help their veteran group. But Keenum’s pre-Minnesota career makes it difficult to judge what the Broncos are getting.
Of the players potentially worthy of this pick, only Quenton Nelson would qualify as filling a dire Denver need, but Bradley Chubb, Saquon Barkley or even Denzel Ward would be an improvement for a team that could use additional talent to help climb back to AFC contention.
However, if Keenum is merely a modest upgrade from Trevor Siemian and Brock Osweiler, thus a placeholder rather than a long-term answer, it may look bad if the Broncos bypassed Josh Rosen or possibly Baker Mayfield because they signed a journeyman quarterback instead. Previously pegged as Rosen fans earlier in this pre-draft process, the Broncos may now have eyes for Mayfield. But so do the Jets, it appears.
Broncos trade-down noise emerged this week, and that would give the franchise better odds at landing multiple 2018 starters in this draft. Denver’s only held a top-five pick twice in the past 35 years (2011 and 1991), and depending on how the Giants proceed at No. 2, the Broncos could have a chance to take the best or second-best non-QB in the draft. That would help a veteran team.
However, being the Bills’ or another team’s vehicle to trade into the top five could as well. Although, it’s possible teams will see the Giants’ pick or the Browns’ No. 4 spot as better trade-up targets rather than the Broncos’ slot. If the pre-draft buzz is an accurate indication, a team considering a trade-up decision may only have Rosen on the board to target by the time the Broncos pick. If just one quarterback is there at 5, Denver’s leverage shrinks.
Keenum’s contract guarantees him $25MM over the next two years. That’s $6MM more than the Bears guaranteed Mike Glennon but $1MM less than the Eagles guaranteed Sam Bradford. That wouldn’t necessarily stand to prohibit another quarterback addition, although the Broncos — with Paxton Lynch, who has made just four starts, still on the roster — would join a short list of teams to have selected a first-round passer twice in three years.
But with the Broncos’ core on the verge of the “aging” label, and the team coming off a 5-11 season, they need to come out of this draft much better than they entered it in order to maximize the latter portions of their championship nucleus’ primes.
So, is the best way to do that to select a quarterback at No. 5? Or is the Broncos’ $18MM-AAV investment in Keenum sufficient enough for them to take the best player available? Should John Elway be hoping a team calls with a viable trade offer? Which is the best route for the Broncos? Take PFR’s latest poll and weigh in with your thoughts in the comments section!
Checking In On 2018’s Restricted Free Agents
The deadline for NFL restricted free agents to sign offer sheets with rival clubs is April 20, so RFAs have 11 more days to discuss deals with other teams. So far, only two RFAs — defensive lineman Xavier Williams and wide receiver Cameron Meredith — have inked offer sheets. The Cardinals declined to match Williams’ offer from the Chiefs, while the Bears are still mulling the terms of Meredith’s proposal from the Saints.
Other restricted free agents have also drawn varying degrees of interest. Saints wideout Willie Snead has worked out for and met with the Ravens, but hasn’t yet signed an offer sheet (Baltimore also reportedly sent a proposal to Meredith before he inked a deal with New Orleans). Bears cornerback Bryce Callahan, meanwhile, has been linked to the division-rival Vikings, but so far no offer sheet has been proferred.
In total, more than 30 restricted free agents have been tendered this offseason. Let’s take a look at where things stand with those RFAs:
Under Contract
Signed to offer sheet:
- Xavier Williams, DL: Signed two-year, $5.057MM offer sheet with Chiefs. Cardinals declined to match.
- Cameron Meredith, WR: Signed two-year, $9.6MM offer sheet with Saints. Bears have until Wednesday to match.
Second-round tender ($2.914MM):
- Chris Boswell, K (Steelers)
- Justin Coleman, CB (Seahawks)
- Quincy Enunwa, WR (Jets)
- Ben Garland, OL (Falcons)
- Corey Grant, RB (Jaguars)
- Brett Jones, C (Giants)
Original round / right of first refusal tender ($1.907MM):
- Josh Bellamy, WR (Bears)
- Brent Qvale, T (Jets)
- Quinton Spain, G (Titans)
Signed extension:
- Cameron Brate, TE (Buccaneers): Six years, $40.8MM.
- Quinton Dunbar, CB (Redskins): Three years, $10.5MM.
- Nick Dzubnar, LB (Chargers): Two years, $3.05MM.
- Deshazor Everett, S (Redskins): Two years, $2.6MM.
- Brandon King, S (Patriots): Two years, $2.6MM.
- Roosevelt Nix, FB (Steelers): Four years, $6.975MM.
- Greg Van Roten, OL (Panthers): Two years, $1.66MM.
Signed new one-year deal:
- Jordan Berry, P (Steelers)
- Geremy Davis, WR (Chargers)
- Mark Nzeocha, LB (49ers)
- Adrian Phillips, S (Chargers)
Unsigned
Second-round tender ($2.914MM):
- Ricardo Allen, S (Falcons)
- Shaquil Barrett, LB (Broncos)
- Nick Easton, OL (Vikings)
- Adam Humphries, WR (Buccaneers)
- David Irving, DL (Cowboys)
- Ty Nsekhe, T (Redskins)
- Matt Paradis, C (Broncos)
- Tyrell Williams, WR (Chargers)
Original round / right of first refusal tender ($1.907MM):
- Bryce Callahan, CB (Bears)
- Anthony Chickillo, LB (Steelers)
- T.J. Jones, WR (Lions)
- Dion Jordan, DE (Seahawks)
- Matt Longacre, LB (Rams)
- Greg Mancz, C (Texans)
- Chris McCain, LB (Chargers)
- Jamie Meder, DT (Browns)
- Rontez Miles, S (Jets)
- Rakeem Nunez-Roches, DE (Chiefs)
- Willie Snead, WR (Saints)
- Neal Sterling, TE (Jets)
PFR Originals: 4/1/18 – 4/8/18
The original content and analysis produced by the PFR staff during the past week:
- With the 2018 NFL draft fewer than three weeks away, Sam Robinson asked PFR readers what the Browns should do with the No. 1 overall pick. USC quarterback Sam Darnold seems to the the player most linked to Cleveland’s top choice, and he was indeed the favorite of the poll’s respondents. But the Browns could also consider another quarterback such as Wyoming’s Josh Allen or Oklahoma’s Baker Mayfield, or a running back like Penn State’s Saquon Barkley.
- In a similar vein, Micah Powell queried PFR readers as to how the Giants should deploy the second overall selection. Big Blue has seemingly even more options that the Browns, as the club could set itself up for the future by drafting a quarterback, or enter win-now mode by coming away with Barkley, defensive end Bradley Chubb, or offensive lineman Quenton Nelson. 30% of the poll’s participants — a plurality — went with Barkley.
- Mayfield will almost certainly be a top-10 selection, but where exactly he’ll come off the board is unclear. Ryan Posner posed that question to PFR readers, and the majority responded by linking Mayfield to the Jets. New York, of course, recently sent a king’s ransom to Indianapolis in exchange for the No. 3 overall pick, and general manager Mike Maccagnan seems incredibly likely to use that selection on a passer after whiffing on Bryce Petty and Christian Hackenberg over the past several years.
- 2019 fifth-year option decisions are due by May 3, so Zach Links posted a refresher of the mechanism for first-round pick contracts, noting the timeline, structure, and value of the options.
Poll: What Should Giants Do At No. 2?
With the Browns likely to take a quarterback with the No. 1 pick in the NFL Draft later this month, the attention is now firmly on what the Giants will do with the very next pick.
Just a year ago, the team entered the 2017 season as one of the favorites to represent the NFC in Super Bowl LII. With the acquisition of veteran pass catcher Brandon Marshall and the core of its standout defense in tact, the team seemed destined to at least challenge for a playoff spot. That, of course, was not the case. Marshall and Odell Beckham Jr. suffered season-ending injuries, the defense was not what was expected and the team stumbled to an almost unthinkable 3-13 finish.
Down the stretch, the team even benched longtime quarterback Eli Manning to get a look at Geno Smith. That move seemed to mark the end of Manning’s time in New York, but he is now set to return for his 15th season in the Big Apple. Which puts the team in an interesting spot.
With the No. 2 pick in a draft full of quarterback prospects and a 37-year-old signal-caller at the helm, the logical move would be to snap up a Josh Allen, Sam Darnold, Josh Rosen or Baker Mayfield with the pick at let them learn behind a two-time Super Bowl winner.
But the team is hoping that last season was an aberration, and with a new general manager in the fold in Dave Gettleman, the Giants could be looking for a quick rebound in 2018. If that is the route, the team could pounce on Penn State running back Saquon Barkley at No. 2, similar to how the Cowboys took Ezekiel Elliott at No. 4 in 2016, and field a formidable offense. 
With the Giants moving to a 3-4 defense in 2018, the team traded longtime defensive end and unlikely scheme fit Jason Pierre-Paul to Tampa Bay in the offseason. That seemed to signal a move toward N.C. State pass rusher and near-unanimous top defensive player in the draft Bradley Chubb being the target. Chubb himself is more suited for the 4-3, however, and might not reach his full potential in the scheme.
New York could also look to protect Manning with Notre Dame guard Quenton Nelson, heralded by most draft pundits as a can’t-miss prospect. If that route came to fruition, Nelson could be the target if the team decided to trade back with another quarterback-hungry team craving the No. 2 spot.
So, what do you think? Should the Giants go after one of the top quarterbacks, take arguably the top player in the draft in Barkley, add a dynamic defender in Chubb, fortify their offensive line with Nelson or stockpile assets with a trade down? Take PFR’s latest poll and weigh in with your thoughts in the comments section!
The Fifth-Year Option
Over the next several weeks, we’ll be passing along a number of reports relating to the fifth-year option, which a team can exercise on a 2015 first-round pick who is currently in the fourth year of his rookie contract. Last month, the Panthers informally got the party started when word leaked out that they’ll be exercising the 2019 option for linebacker Shaq Thompson.
So what exactly is the fifth-year option? Essentially, it’s a way to extend a player’s rookie contract by an extra year, at the club’s discretion. Players
don’t have any say in whether or not these options are picked up, though players and teams are still free to negotiate longer-term contracts that would render the fifth-year option unnecessary. Otherwise though, the decision is in the hands of the team, and must be made by May 3 in the player’s fourth season. So, barring multiyear extensions, 2015 first-rounders like Marcus Mariota, Amari Cooper, and Marcus Peters will likely see their options exercised within the next month.
For top-10 picks, the amount of each player’s 2019 option has already been determined. The fifth-year salary for a top-10 pick is equal to the transition tender at the player’s position during his fourth season. So, because the transition tag for quarterbacks this year was $20.922MM, we already know that Mariota’s fifth-year option will be worth that amount.
For first-rounders picked outside the top 10, the calculation is a little more complicated. These players’ fifth-year option also relies on the previous year’s salaries at the player’s position, but it’s determined by the average of the third through 25th top salaries at that position. So we could come up with estimates for the 2019 option salary for players like Melvin Gordon, Byron Jones, and Trae Waynes, but they’re not set in stone quite yet.
Fifth-year options are guaranteed for injury only between May 3 and the start of the following league year. As such, they’re not entirely risk-free, but as long as the player remains healthy, a team could exercise his fifth-year option, then cut him before his option year gets underway without being on the hook for his salary. When the league year begins, the player’s fifth-year salary becomes guaranteed for skill and cap purposes, as well as injury.
Note: This is a PFR Glossary entry. Our glossary posts explain specific rules relating to free agency, trades, or other aspects of the NFL’s Collective Bargaining Agreement. This post was modified from an early entry by editor emeritus Luke Adams.
Poll: What Should Browns Do At No. 1?
With Cleveland decision-makers confirming what’s long been rumored this week about the team’s intentions to draft a quarterback with its top pick, it appears relatively safe to assume one of four passing prospects will end up in northeast Ohio next season.
After the Browns traded out of draft slots that ended up sending Carson Wentz to the Eagles and Deshaun Watson to the Texans the past two years, they appear committed to finalizing this extensive research project in the coming weeks. But which of the top QBs should be Cleveland-bound?
Sam Darnold‘s probably been the player most linked to the Browns with their top pick, but Josh Allen continues to lurk as well. And the team’s interest in Baker Mayfield persists. While Josh Rosen has become the member of this quartet least linked to Cleveland, the UCLA talent remains in relative contention here and appears a safe bet to be chosen in the top 10 — if not in the top five.
Darnold did not throw at the Combine but impressed at a rainy pro day in Los Angeles. Although some scouts would prefer he work on a slightly elongated throwing motion, the USC product does not plan to adjust it. He’s long been rumored to go in this draft slot, even before the Browns acquired it, and was much more diplomatic about being sent to Ohio than Rosen.
Hue Jackson mentioned he would prefer the Browns landing a prospect with some mobility to work in the offense alongside Tyrod Taylor. However, John Dorsey wasn’t as committed to that. Rosen would not be a great fit if the Browns sought a mobile passer, and in being viewed as perhaps the readiest pro, sitting for a full season — as the Browns would like the rookie-to-be to do as Taylor starts — may not match up with his timeline either.
ESPN’s Mel Kiper Jr. has mocked Allen to Cleveland for months, and Jackson said the Wyoming talent “looks the part.” The Mountain West Conference-honed prodigy also wowed at the Combine with this blend of athleticism and arm strength, and he’s viewed as raw enough that a de facto redshirt season might behoove his development. He seemed intrigued about bucking the trend of bad QB investments in Cleveland.
Not initially viewed to be on the same tier as the other three members of this quartet, Mayfield has seen his stock climb steadily this offseason. The Heisman Trophy recipient, amid fighting off Johnny Manziel comparisons, is coming off a “great” workout with the Browns recently. He’s been linked to Cleveland consistently, particularly with Browns consultant Scot McCloughan being a staunch Mayfield proponent, but could also be available if the Browns decide to take an unconventional route and hold off their quarterback pick until No. 4.
While that’s not expected, Jackson has offered effusive Bradley Chubb praise. And it’s not certain the N.C. State pass rusher will make it past the Giants at No. 2. Saquon Barkley is listed atop many prospect lists, but no running back has gone No. 1 since Penn State’s Ki-Jana Carter in 1995. And the Browns just signed Carlos Hyde. It’s not out of the question Cleveland trades the No. 1 pick, but after what’s transpired the past two years regarding this franchise and quarterbacks, that seems unlikely.
So, which one of the passers should soon expect to look for Ohio real estate? Is Allen’s upside too tantalizing to ignore? Does the apparent clubhouse leader Darnold represent the best combination of talent and intangibles to go No. 1? Is Mayfield worthy of this pick? Or is it possible the Browns are ready to pull another unexpected maneuver and either trade the pick or select a non-quarterback? Take PFR’s latest poll and weigh in with your thoughts in the comments section!
PFR Originals: 3/18/18 – 3/25/18
The original content and analysis produced by the PFR staff during the past week:
- With the draft right around the corner, I examined how much draft capital each club currently possesses. Not every pick is created equally, of course, so in addition to listing how many selections each team has, I calculated how many “draft points” each club boasts by using Chase Stuart of Football Perspective’s draft value chart.
- Because most NFL coaching changes happen in January, those moves can often be overshadowed by the postseason and – subsequently – the major additions that teams makes in free agency. With that in mind, I rounded up each of 2018’s Major NFL Coaching Changes.
- PFR will keep track of every NFL trade, starting with the first day of the 2018 league year on March 14 all the way until the trade deadline in November.
2018 NFL Draft Pick Capital By Team
While each NFL team is organically handed seven draft picks per season, trades involving draft choices and the compensatory pick process ensures that many clubs end up with more (or fewer) than their original seven selections. As always, you can view the complete 2018 draft order, but here we’ll look at how much draft capital each club has amassed.
Let’s take a look at how many draft picks each NFL club currently possesses:
Updated 4-8-18 (1:47pm CT)
12 picks
- Green Bay Packers
11 picks
- Cincinnati Bengals
- Oakland Raiders
10 picks
- Dallas Cowboys
9 picks
- Buffalo Bills
- Cleveland Browns
- Indianapolis Colts
- San Francisco 49ers
8 picks
- Arizona Cardinals
- Baltimore Ravens
- Carolina Panthers
- Denver Broncos
- Houston Texans
- Kansas City Chiefs
- Los Angeles Rams
- Miami Dolphins
- Minnesota Vikings
- New England Patriots
- New Orleans Saints
- Seattle Seahawks
- Washington Redskins
7 picks
- Atlanta Falcons
- Chicago Bears
- Jacksonville Jaguars
- Los Angeles Chargers
- Pittsburgh Steelers
- Tampa Bay Buccaneers
6 picks
- Detroit Lions
- New York Giants
- New York Jets
- Philadelphia Eagles
- Tennessee Titans
Of course, not all draft picks are created equally, as holding more early-round selections is eminently more valuable than collecting mid-to-late round picks. Using Chase Stuart of Football Perspective‘s draft value chart, we can calculate how many draft capital points each team owns heading into the 2018 NFL draft:
- Cleveland Browns: 102.8
- Indianapolis Colts: 74.1
- Buffalo Bills: 72.9
- New York Giants: 65.8
- Denver Broncos: 62.6
- New England Patriots: 53.5
- Green Bay Packers: 52.5
- San Francisco 49ers: 52.2
- Oakland Raiders: 49.4
- Cincinnati Bengals: 49.2
- Chicago Bears: 46.6
- Miami Dolphins: 45.6
- Dallas Cowboys: 44.4
- Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 44.0
- New York Jets: 43.8
- Arizona Cardinals: 41.8
- Baltimore Ravens: 41.1
- Los Angeles Chargers: 40.8
- Washington Redskins: 39.5
- Detroit Lions: 38.5
- Tennessee Titans: 36.0
- Atlanta Falcons: 33.2
- Carolina Panthers: 33.0
- Pittsburgh Steelers: 32.9
- Jacksonville Jaguars: 31.8
- Kansas City Chiefs: 31.2
- Seattle Seahawks: 30.7
- Minnesota Vikings: 30.4
- New Orleans Saints: 30.2
- Houston Texans: 27.6
- Los Angeles Rams: 22.7
- Philadelphia Eagles: 22.2
